Advertisement

Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics

, Volume 110, Issue 2, pp 185–192 | Cite as

The problem of preparing entangled pairs of polarization qubits in the frequency-nondegenerate regime

  • S. S. StraupeEmail author
  • S. P. Kulik
Atoms, Molecules, Optics

Abstract

The problems associated with the practical implementation of the scheme proposed for preparation of arbitrary states of polarization ququarts based on biphotons have been discussed. The influence of effects of frequency dispersion are considered, and the necessity of compensating the dispersion of group velocities in the frequency-nondegenerate case even for continuous pumping is demonstrated. A method for this compensation is proposed and implemented experimentally. Physical restrictions on the quality of the prepared two-photon states are revealed.

Keywords

Entangle State Spatial Mode Group Velocity Dispersion Interference Filter Arbitrary State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    H. Bechmann-Pasquinucci and A. Peres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3313 (2000).CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Bechmann-Pasquinucci and W. Tittel, Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 61, 062308 (2000).MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Bourennane, A. Karlsson, and G. Bjork, Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 64, 012306 (2001).ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. V. Horoshko and S. Ya. Kilin, Opt. Spektrosk. 94(5), 691 (2003) [Opt. Spectrosc. 94 (5), 691 (2003)].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Kaszlikowski, P. Gnasinski, M. Zukowski, W. Miklaszewski, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4418 (2000); D. Kaszlikowski, D. K. L. Oi, M. Christandl, K. Chang, A. Ekert, L. C. Kwek, and C. H. Oh, Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 67, 012310 (2003); T. Durt, N. J. Cerf, N. Gisin, and M. Zukowski, Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 67, 012311 (2003); D. Collins, N. Gisin, N. Linden, S. Massar, and S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 040404 (2002).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Genovese, Phys. Rep. 413, 319 (2005).CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. F. V. James, P. G. Kwiat, W. J. Munro, and A. G. White, Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 64, 052312 (2001).ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yu. I. Bogdanov, E. V. Moreva, G. A. Maslennikov, R. F. Galeev, S. S. Straupe, and S. P. Kulik, Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 73, 063810 (2006).ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yu. I. Bogdanov, L. A. Krivitsky, and S. P. Kulik, Pis’ma Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 78(6), 804 (2003) [JETP Lett. 78 (6), 352 (2003)].Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. E. Kiess, Y. H. Shih, A. V. Sergienko, and C. O. Alley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3893 (1993).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Y. H. Shih, A. V. Sergienko, M. H. Rubin, T. E. Kiess, and C. O. Alley, Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 50, 23 (1994).ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. G. Kwiat, K. Mattle, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4337 (1995).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. G. Kwiat, E. Waks, A. G. White, I. Appelbaum, and P. H. Eberhard, Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 60, R773 (1999).ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. V. Burlakov, S. P. Kulik, G. O. Rytikov, and M. V. Chekhova, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 122(4), 738 (2002) [JETP 95 (4), 639 (2002)].Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. V. Moreva, G. A. Maslennikov, S. S. Straupe, and S. P. Kulik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 023602 (2006).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Y. H. Kim, S. P. Kulik, and Y. Shih, Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 63, 060301 (2001).ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Y. H. Kim, M. Rubin, M. V. Chekhova, S. P. Kulik, and Y. Shih, Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 63, 062301 (2001).ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. G. White, D. F. V. James, P. H. Eberhard, and P. G. Kwiat, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3103 (1999).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    So-Young Baek, S. Straupe, S. Kulik, A. Shurupov, and Y.-H. Kim, Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 78, 042t321 (2008).ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. P. Shurupov, S. S. Straupe, S. P. Kulik, R. M. B. Wahiddin, and R. Gharib, Eur. Phys. Lett. (2009) (in press).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. Rubin, D. N. Klyshko, Y. H. Shih, and A. V. Sergienko, Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 50, 5122 (1994).ADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. V. Burlakov, M. V. Chekhova, D. N. Klyshko, S. P. Kulik, A. N. Penin, Y. H. Shih, and D. V. Strekalov, Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 56, 3214 (1997).ADSGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    G. Brida, M. Chekhova, M. Genovese, and L. Krivitsky, Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 76, 053807 (2007).ADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    M. V. Fedorov, M. A. Efremov, P. A. Volkov, and J. H. Eberly, J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys. 39, S467 (2006); Yu. M. Mikhailova, P. A. Volkov, and M. V. Fedorov, Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 78,062327 (2008).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    M. V. Chekhova, Pis’ma Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 75(5), 271 (2002) [JETP Lett. 75 (5), 225 (2002)].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations