Advertisement

Astronomy Reports

, Volume 61, Issue 12, pp 1061–1072 | Cite as

Results of Long-Term Monitoring of Maser Emission in the Star-forming Region G 10.623–0.383

  • P. Colom
  • E. E. LekhtEmail author
  • M. I. Pashchenko
  • G. M. Rudnitskii
  • A. M. Tolmachev
Article
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

The results of a study of the maser source G 10.623-0.383 in the λ = 1.35 cm H2O line using the 22-mradio telescope of the Pushchino Radio AstronomyObservatory (Russia) and in the main hydroxyl lines (λ = 18 cm) using the Nanзay Radio Telescope (France) are presented. Uncorrelated long-term variations of the integrated intensities and the velocity centroids with characteristic times of 11 yrs (mean value) and 32 yrs, respectively, are studied. The drift of the velocity centroid may be associated with maser condensations whose material is collapsing onto the OB cluster. It is shown that the H2O maser source contains maser condensation configurations on various scales over a long time, which evolve with time. OH maser emission was only detected in the main lines at 1665 and 1667 MHz. The flux densities of the strongest emission components were variable, but their radial velocities did not change. A Zeeman pair was found at 1667 MHz with a splitting of about 1.44 km/s, corresponding to a line-of-sight magnetic field of 4.1 mG, which was preserved over at least 25 years. The characteristics of the H2O andOHmaser variability suggests that the masers are located in different parts of G 10.623–0.383.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    W. M. Goss and P. A. Shaver, Austral. J. Phys. Astrophys. Suppl. 14, 1 (1970).ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. C. Reifenstein, T. L. Wilson, B. F. Burke, P. G. Mezger, and W. J. Altenhoff, Astron. Astrophys. 4, 357 (1970).ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. J. Wright, G. G. Fazio, and F. J. Low, Astrophys. J. 217, 724 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. T. P. Ho and A. D. Haschick, Astrophys. J. 248, 622 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. T.P. Ho, R. I. Klein, and A. D. Haschick, Astrophys. J. 305, 714 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Corbel and S. S. Eikenberry, Astron. Astrophys. 419, 191 (2004).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Sanna, M. J. Reid, K. M. Menten, T. M. Dame, et al., Astrophys. J. 781, 1 (2014).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. R. Keto, Astrophys. J. 568, 760 (2002).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. T. P. Ho and A. D. Haschick, Astrophys. J. 304, 501 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. R. Keto, P. T. P. Ho, and M. J. Reid, Astrophys. J. 303, L113 (1987).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. Downes, Astrophys. Lett. 5, 51 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. E. Turner and R. H. Rubin, Astrophys. J. 170, L113 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. R. Forster and J. L. Caswell, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 137, 43 (1999).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. L. Argon, M. J. Reid, and K. M. Menten, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 129, 159 (2000).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    V. L. Fish and M. J. Reid, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 164, 99 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    E. E. Lekht, V. A. Munitsyn, and A. M. Tolmachev, Astron. Rep. 49, 44 (2005).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    E. E. Lekht, V. A. Munitsyn, and A. M. Tolmachev, Astron. Lett. 31, 315 (2005).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    K. S. Yngvesson, A. G. Cardiasmenos, J. F. Shanley, O. E. H. Rydbeck, and J. Elldér, Astrophys. J. 195, 91 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    G. J. White and G. H. MacDonald, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 188, 745 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    G. G. Fazio, C. J. Lada, D. E. Kleinmann, E. L. Wright, P. T. P. Ho, and F. J. Low, Astrophys. J. 221, L77 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. Genzel and D. Downes, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 30, 145 (1977).ADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    E. E. Lekht, N. A. Silant’ev, V. V. Krasnov, and V. A. Munitsyn, Astron. Rep. 50, 638 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. L. Sorochenko, E. E. Lekht, and J. E. Mendoza-Torres, Astron. Rep. 42, 592 (1998).ADSGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    E. E. Lekht, V. I. Slysh, and V. V. Krasnov, Astron. Rep. 51, 967 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    J. M. Torrelles, N. A. Patel, G. Anglada, J. F. Gómez, et al., Astrophys. J. 598, L115 (2003).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    L. Fish, M. J. Reid, A. L. Argon, and Xing-Wu Zheng, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 160, 220 (2005).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    J. L. Caswell, J. A. Green and C. J. Phillips, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 431, 1180 (2013).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    M. J. Reid, A. D. Haschick, B. F. Burke, J. M. Moran, K. J. Johnston, and G. M. Swenson, Jr., Astrophys. J. 239, 89 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Colom
    • 1
  • E. E. Lekht
    • 2
    Email author
  • M. I. Pashchenko
    • 2
  • G. M. Rudnitskii
    • 2
  • A. M. Tolmachev
    • 3
  1. 1.LESIA, Observatoire de Paris-Meudon, CNRS, UPMCUniversité Paris-DiderotMeudon CedexFrance
  2. 2.Lomonosov Moscow State UniversitySternberg Astronomical InstituteMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Pushchino Radio Astronomy Observatory, Astro Space Center, Lebedev Physical InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesPushchinoRussia

Personalised recommendations