Acoustical Physics

, Volume 62, Issue 2, pp 169–178 | Cite as

Constructing ultrasonic images of soft spherical scatterers

  • E. A. Annenkova
  • S. A. Tsysar’
  • O. A. Sapozhnikov
Physical Acoustics


The paper considers specific features of ultrasonic visualization of gas bubbles in a liquid or a medium of like soft biological tissue type under conditions when the size of scatterers is comparable to the acoustic wavelength. It was proposed to use styrofoam specimens as the experimental model of stationary gas bubbles. Patterns of ultrasound scattering by a styrofoam sphere in water were obtained experimentally. It was shown that the measurement results agree well with the prediction of the classical theoretical model of scattering of a plane wave by a perfectly soft sphere. Several experiments were performed illustrating the specific features of visualizing millimeter-sized bubbles. A Terason commercial ultrasonic scanner was used; gelatin specimens with embedded styrofoam spheres served as the objects of study. The simulation and experimental results showed that when bubbles with diameters of <1 mm are visualized, it is impossible to measure the diameter of scatterers because bubbles of different diameters are imaged as bright spots of identical diameter, which is equal to the scanner resolution. To eliminate this difficulty, it is recommended to use the results of theoretical simulation performed in this study, which revealed a monotonic increase in the backscattered signal intensity with an increase in bubble radius. An ultrasonic visualization mode is proposed in which the brightness of scattered signals is used to differentiate between bubbles of different size.


ultrasonic diagnostics scattering millimeter-sized gas bubbles 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    G. S. Kino, Acoustic Waves: Devices, Imaging and Analog Signal Analog Processing (Prentice-Hall, 1987; Mir, Moscow, 1990).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. R. Hill, J. C. Bamber, G. R. ter Haar, Physical Principles of Medical Ultrasonics (Wiley, 2002; Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2008).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. R. Bailey, S. G. Kargl, L. A. Crum, V. A. Khokhlova, and O. A. Sapozhnikov, Acoust. Phys. 49, 369 (2003).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Maxwell, O. A. Sapozhnikov, M. R. Bailey, L. A. Crum, Z. Xu, B. Fowlkes, Ch. Cain, and V. A. Khokhlova, Acoustics Today 8, 24 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. D. Lapin, Acoust. Phys. 44, 364 (1998).ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yu. N. Makov, Acoust. Phys. 55, 547 (2009).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ph. Morse, Vibration and Sound (MacGraw-Hill, 1948; Gos. Izd. Tekhn.-Teor. Lit., Moscow, 1949).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Zinin, W. Weise, O. Lobkis, and S. Boseck, Wave Motion 25, 213 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. Weise, P. Zinin, A. Briggs, T. Wilson, and S. Boseck, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 181 (1998).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. E. Dontsov, V. E. Nakoryakov, and B. G. Pokusaev, Acoust. Phys. 42, 689 (1996).ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    F. W. Kremkau, Diagnostic Ultrasound: Principles and Instruments (Saunders Elsevier, 2006).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    T. L. Szabo, Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging (Elsevier Academic, 2004).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. A. Annenkova
    • 1
  • S. A. Tsysar’
    • 1
  • O. A. Sapozhnikov
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Center for Industrial and Medical Ultrasound, Applied Physics LaboratoryUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations