The Spatial Variability of the Fluorescent Characteristics of Phytoplankton in the Black Sea
- 9 Downloads
The spatial variability of the photochemical efficiency of phytoplankton photosystem II was analyzed in two contrasting regions of the Black Sea: the western part of the deepwater region and a region influenced by the Danube River discharge. The fluorescence values for open (F0) and closed (Fm) photosystem II reaction centers in the investigated areas varied by an order of magnitude and correlated closely. The potential photochemical efficiency of phytoplankton photosystem II (Fm − F0)/Fm varied from 0.16 to 0.70. Three types of the vertical distribution of this index were found. In the first type, the values increased from the surface to the top of the thermocline and then remained stable down to the bottom of the euphotic zone; in the second type, they increased from the surface to the bottom of the euphotic zone; in shallow areas, they were stable within the euphotic zone. With an increase in light intensity, the phytoplankton photochemical efficiency decreased. The light inhibition of the photosystem II efficiency was more intense in the deeper than in the upper layers of the euphotic zone.
Keywordsfluorescent characteristics phytoplankton spatial variability Black Sea
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Vedernikov, V.I., Primary production and chlorophyll in the Black Sea in the summer–fall period, Struktura i produktsionnye kharakteristiki planktonnykh soobshchestv Chernogo morya (Structure and Productional Characteristics of the Planktonic Communities of the Black Sea), Moscow: Nauka, 1989, pp. 65–83.Google Scholar
- 2.Konyukhov, I.V., Measurement of the fluorescence parameters of the diatom Thalassiosira weissflogii when grown under different conditions of irradiance and mineral nutrients, Cand. Sc. (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow, 2009.Google Scholar
- 3.Matorin, D.N. and Alekseev, A.A., Fluorestsentsiya khlorofilla dlya biodiagnostiki rastenii (Chlorophyll Fluorescence for Biodiagnostics of Plants), Moscow: Altreks, 2013.Google Scholar
- 4.Osipov, V.A., Relationship of fluorescence parameters of microalgae to environmental factors, including anthropogenic pollution, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow, 2006.Google Scholar
- 5.Pogosyan, S.I, Gal’chuk, S.V., Kazimirko, Yu.V., et al., Use of a MEGA-25 fluorometer for estimation of quantity of phytoplankton and assessment of its photosynthetic apparatus state, Voda: Khim. Ekol., 2009, no. 2, pp. 34–40.Google Scholar
- 6.Terenko, G.V. and Terenko, L.M., Severo-zapadnaya chast Chernogo morya: biologiya i ekologiya (The Northwestern Part of the Black Sea: Biology and Ecology), Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, 2006.Google Scholar
- 7.Finenko, Z.Z., Churilova, T.Ya., Sosik, H.M., and Basturk, O., Variability of photosynthetic parameters of the surface phytoplankton in the Black Sea, Oceanology (Engl. Transl.), 2002, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 53–67.Google Scholar
- 13.Pogosyan, S.I. and Matorin, D.N., Variability in the condition of the photosynthetic system of the Black Sea phytoplankton, Oceanology (Moscow), 2005, vol. 45, suppl. 1, pp. S139–S148.Google Scholar
- 14.Serôdio, J., Vieria, S., Cruz, S., and Coelho, H., Rapid light-response curves of chlorophyll fluorescence in microalgae: relationship to steady-state light curves and non-photochemical quenching in benthic diatomdominated assemblages, Photosynth. Res., 2006, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 29–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar