Biology Bulletin

, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 100–109 | Cite as

Changes in Vegetation and Earthworm Populations under Free Grazing European Bison (Bison bonasus) in Broad-Leaved Forests of the Kaluzhskie Zaseki State Nature Reserve

  • N. V. Ivanova
  • V. E. Smirnov
  • L. G. Khanina
  • M. V. Bobrovsky
  • M. P. Shashkov
Ecology
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

This paper studies the impact of a free-ranging bison population on the vegetation and soil fauna in spatially adjacent biotopes (meadow-transition zone-surrounding forest) in the Kaluzhskie Zaseki State Nature Reserve. It is noted that bison maintains meadows in the absence of haymaking. Analysis of phytosociological relevés shows that the forest vegetation has been significantly transformed by bison over 10–15 years, as evident from (1) differences in the ecological-coenotic structure of the vegetation in the different biotopes, (2) a larger ecological-coenotic diversity of communities in the transition zones in comparison with surrounding forests, and (3) an increase in the participation of nitrophilous species in the vegetation. A fairly high earthworm species diversity (a total of seven species in the biotopes) is found; Aporrectodea caliginosa dominates in the earthworm density and biomass. The total earthworm density and biomass became lower in the transition zone than in neighboring forests and meadows, and the differences in earthworm density between the transition zone and the meadows were statistically significant.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, M.J., Distance-based tests for homogeneity of multivariate dispersions, Biometrics, 2006, vol. 62, pp. 245–253.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bobrovsky, M.V. and Khanina, L.G., Kaluzhskie Zaseki Nature Reserve, in Otsenka i sokhranenie bioraznoobraziya lesnogo pokrova v zapovednikakh Evropeyskoi Rossii (Assessment and Conservation of Biodiversity of the Forest Cover in the Nature Reserves of the European Part of Russia), Zaugol’nova, L.B., Ed., Moscow: Nauchnyi mir, 2000, pp. 104–124.Google Scholar
  3. Borcard, D., Gilbert, F., and Legendre, P., Numerical Ecology with R!. Use R Series, New York: Springer Sci., 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dufrêne, M. and Legendre, P., Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach, Ecol. Monogr., 1997, vol. 67, pp. 345–366.Google Scholar
  5. Dyrenkov, S.A., Golgofskaya, K.Yu., and Nemtsev, A.S., Bisons of the Caucasian Nature Reserve and their impact on vegetation. Biogenic successions, in Voprosy biogeotsenologii (Problems of Biogeocenology), Moscow: Izd. MGU, 1990, pp. 96–151.Google Scholar
  6. Evstigneev, O.I. and Solonina, O.V., Bison and maintaining grassland biodiversity (a case study of the Bryanskii Les Nature Reserve), Byul. MOIP, Otd. Biol., 2016, no. 2, pp. 57–63.Google Scholar
  7. Geras’kina, A.P., Earthworm population (Lumbricidae) in soil of layland, Zool. Zh., 2009, vol. 88, no. 8, pp. 901–906.Google Scholar
  8. Jaroszewicz, B. and Piroznikow, E., Diversity of plant species eaten and dispersed by the European bison Bison bonasus in Białowiez˙a Forest, Eur. Bison Conserv. Newslett., 2008, vol. 1, pp. 14–29.Google Scholar
  9. Jaroszewicz, B., Piroznikow, E., and Sagehorn, R., Endozoochory by European bison (Bison bonasus) in Białowiez˙a Primeval Forest across a management gradient, Forest Ecol. Management, 2009, vol. 258, pp. 11–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kaz’min, V.D. and Smirnov, K.A., Winter foraging, food resources, and trophic effects of the bison on the forest plant communities of the Central Caucasus, Byul. MOIP. Otd. Biol., 1992, no. 2, pp. 26–35.Google Scholar
  11. Khanina, L.G., Grokhlina, T.I., and Glukhova, E.M., New opportunities of the Ecoscale software to handle geobotanical descriptions on the basis of ecological scales, in Matematicheskaya biologiya i bioinformatika: V Mezhdunar. konf. Doklady (Mathematical Biology and Bioinformatics: Proc. V Int. Conf.), Moscow: MaksPress, 2014, pp. 192–193.Google Scholar
  12. Korochkina, L.N., Impact of bison on the regrowth of arboreal vegetation in the Bialowieza Forest, in Belovezhskaya pushcha (Bialowieza Forest), Minsk: Uradzhai, 1971, vol. 4, pp. 167–176.Google Scholar
  13. Krasnaya kniga Kaluzhskoi oblasti (The Red Data Book of the Kaluga region), vol. 1: Rastitel’nyi mir (Flora), Kaluga: Vash Dom, 2015.Google Scholar
  14. Landolt, E., Bäumler, B., Erhard, A., Hegg, O., Klotzli, F., Lammler, W., Nobis, M., Rudmann-Maurer, K., Schweingruber, F.H., Theurillat, J.-P., Urmi, E., Vust, M., and Wohlgemuth, T., Flora indicative. Ökologische Zeigerwerte und biologische Kennzeichen zur Flora der Schweiz und der Alpen, Bern: Haupt-Verlag, 2010.Google Scholar
  15. Legendre, P. and Legendre, L., Developments in Environmental Modelling, 3rd Engl. ed., vol. 24: Numerical Ecology, Amsterdam: Elsevier Sci. BV, 2012.Google Scholar
  16. Manly, B.F.J., Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman Hall CRC, 2007.Google Scholar
  17. Megarran, E., Ekologicheskoe raznoobrazie i ego izmerenie (Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement), Moscow: Mir, 1992.Google Scholar
  18. Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F.G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., McGlinn, D., Minchin, P.R., O’Hara, R.B., Simpson, G.L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M.H., Szoecs, E., and Wagner, Y., Vegan: Community Ecology Package, R package version 2.3-5, 2016. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=veganGoogle Scholar
  19. Popadyuk, R.V., Smirnova, O.V., Zaugol’nova, L.B., Khanina, L.G., Bobrovskii, M.V., and Yanitskaya, T.O., Kaluzhskie Zaseki Nature Reserve, in Suktsessionnye protsessy v zapovednikakh Rossii i problemy sokhraneniya biologicheskogo raznoobraziya (Succession Processes in Russian Reserves and Biological Diversity Conservation), Smirnova, O.V. and Shaposhnikov, E.S., Eds., St. Petersburg: Ross. Bot. Obshch., 1999, pp. 58–105.Google Scholar
  20. Rastitel’nost’ evropeiskoi chasti SSSR (Vegetation of the European Part of the USSR), Leningrad: Nauka, 1980.Google Scholar
  21. R Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria, 2015. URL http://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
  22. Reshetnikova, N.M. and Bobrovsky, M.V., Changes in the flora of vascular plants of the Kaluzhskie Zaseki Nature Reserve, Bot. Zh., 2016, vol. 101, no. 11, pp. 1321–1344.Google Scholar
  23. Schulze, K.A., Buchwald, R., and Heinken, Th., Epizoochory via the hooves—the European bison (Bison bonasus L.) as a dispersal agent of seeds in an open-forest-mosaic, Tuexenia, 2014, vol. 34, pp. 131–143. doi 10.14471/2014.34.016Google Scholar
  24. Shashkov, M.P., The fauna of earthworms (Lumbricidae) of the Kaluzhskie Zaseki Nature Reserve, in Tr. Gos. Prirod. Zapovednika “Kaluzhskie Zaseki” (Proceedings of the Kaluzhskie Zaseki State Nature Reserve), Kaluga: Polygraph-Inform, 2003, vol. 1, pp. 90–93.Google Scholar
  25. Shashkov, M.P., The population of earthworms (Lumbricidae, Oligochaeta) of dark humic soils of the Kaluzhskie Zaseki Nature Reserve, in Tr. Gos. Prirod. Zapovednika “Kaluzhskie Zaseki” (Proceedings of the Kaluzhskie Zaseki State Nature Reserve), Kaluga: Polygraph-Inform, 2003, vol. 2, pp. 110–115.Google Scholar
  26. Shashkov, M.P., Population demographic approaches to studies of earthworms in the forests of the Kaluga oblast, Lesovedenie, 2016, no. 6, pp. 55–64.Google Scholar
  27. Smirnov, V.E., Khanina, L.G., and Bobrovsky, M.V., Validation of the ecological-cenotic groups of vascular plants for European Russian forests on the basis of ecological indicator values, vegetation releves and statistical analysis, 2008. http://www.impb.ru/index.php?id=div/lce/ecg&lang=eng (reference date, August 17).Google Scholar
  28. Smirnov, V.E., Khanina, L.G., and Bobrovsky, M.V., Substantiation of the system of ecocenotic groups of plants of the forest zone of European Russia on the basis of ecological scales, geobotanical descriptions, and statistical analysis, Byul. MOIP. Otd. Biol., 2006, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 36–47.Google Scholar
  29. Smirnova, O.V., Population organization of biocenotic cover in forest landscapes, Usp. Sovrem. Biol., 1998, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 148–165.Google Scholar
  30. Smirnova, O.V., Popadyuk, R.V., Zaugol’nova, L.B., and Khanina, L.G., Assessment of losses in the floristic diversity in forest vegetation (a case study of the Kaluzhskie Zaseki Nature Reserve), Lesovedenie, 1997, no. 2, pp. 27–42.Google Scholar
  31. Smirnova, O.V., Khanina, L.G., and Smirnov, V.E., Ecocenotic groups in the vegetation of the forest belt of Eastern Europe, in Vostochno-Evropeiskie lesa (istoriya v golotsene i sovremennost') (Eastern European Forests (History in the Holocene and the Present Time)), Moscow: Nauka, 2004, vol. 1, chapter 3.2, pp. 165–175.Google Scholar
  32. Spravochnik po klimatu SSSR (Climate Handbook), vol. 8, part IV: Vlazhnost’ vozdukha, atmosfernye osadki i snezhnyi pokrov (Humidity, Precipitation, and Snow Cover), Leningrad: Gidrometoizdat, 1967.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. V. Ivanova
    • 1
  • V. E. Smirnov
    • 1
    • 2
  • L. G. Khanina
    • 1
  • M. V. Bobrovsky
    • 3
  • M. P. Shashkov
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Mathematical Problems of Biology, Branch of the Keldysh Institute of Applied MathematicsRussian Academy of SciencesPushchinoRussia
  2. 2.Center for Forest Ecology and ProductivityRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Institute of Physico-Chemical and Biological Problems in Soil ScienceRussian Academy of SciencesPushchinoRussia

Personalised recommendations