Biology Bulletin

, Volume 44, Issue 9, pp 1019–1034 | Cite as

Peculiarities of the Structure of and Trends in the Macrobenthos Community of the Ermolinskaya Bay Lagoon Ecosystem, Kandalaksha Bay, White Sea

  • A. P. Stolyarov


The species composition and spatial and trophic structures of the macrobenthos communities of the Ermolinskaya Bay were studied, and the main changes that had occurred since previous explorations (the 1960s) were analyzed. The most significant changes in the spatial structure of the macrobenthos community (species diversity, population density and biomass, and similarities of the species’ distribution) were observed with regard to the sea level zone: the most pronounced at the upper littoral, followed by the middle littoral, lower littoral, and sublittoral. The longitudinal gradient of the community structure (from the innermost area seaward) was pronounced less strongly. Altogether, four macrobenthos communities can be identified in Ermolinskaya Bay; they differ in species composition, diversity, population density and biomass, and trophic structure: (1) community of the upper littoral with the dominance of collecting deposit feeders, Hydrobia ulvae, and scrapers, Littorina saxatilis; (2) community of the middle littoral with the prevalence of deposit feeders, Hydrobia ulvae and Macoma balthica, seston feeders, Mya arenaria, and, to a lesser extent, Mytilus edulis; (3) community of the lower littoral with the domination of the filtering organisms, Mytilus edulis, to a lesser extent collecting deposit feeders, Hydrobia ulvae and Macoma balthica, and scrapers, Littorina littorea; and (4) community of the sublittoral, where the leading positions belong to the group of collecting deposit feeders, Macoma balthica, to a lesser extent also Hydrobia ulvae (in the innermost area) and Capitella capitata, Arenicola marina (in the marine part of the bay). The gradual siltation of the bay and the reduction of its connection to the sea have led to the development of a littoral complex of species in the sublittoral, whereas the species typical at the sublittoral in the 1960s are now mainly found at the outlet of the bay.


estuarine ecosystem macrobenthos community structure trend White Sea 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Berger, V.Ya., The productive potential of the White Sea, in Issledovaniya fauny morei (Studies of Marine Fauna), St. Petersburg: ZIN RAN, 2007, vol. 60 (68).Google Scholar
  2. Berger, V.Ya., Adaptatsii morskikh mollyuskov k izmeneniyam solenosti sredy (Adaptations of Marine Mollusks to Changes in Ambient Salinity), Leningrad: Nauka, 1986.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, V.Ya., On the adaptations of littoral mollusks of the White Sea to changing salinity, in Issledovaniya fauny morei (Studies of Marine Fauna), vol. 17 (25): Solenostnye adaptatsii vodnykh organizmov (Salinity Adaptations of Aquatic Organisms), Berger V.Ya. and Khlebovich V.V., Eds., 1976.Google Scholar
  4. Brafield, A.E. and Newell, G.E., The behaviour of Macoma balthica (L.), J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U. K., 1961, vol. 41, pp. 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brotskaya, V.A., Zhdanova, N.N., and Semenova, N.L., The benthic fauna of the Great Salma and adjacent areas of the Kandalaksha Bay of the White Sea, in Trudy Kandalakshskogo gos. zapovednika (Proceedings of the Kandalaksha State Reserve), Voronezh: Voronezhskoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo, 1963, no. 4, pp. 159–182.Google Scholar
  6. Burkovskii, I.V., Strukturno-funktsional’naya organizatsiya i ustoichivost’ morskikh donnykh soobshchestv (Structural and Functional Organization and Sustainability of Marine Benthic Communities), Moscow: Izd. MGU, 1992.Google Scholar
  7. Burkovskii, I.V., Morskaya biogeotsenologiya. Organizatsiya soobshchestv i ekosistem (Marine Biogeocenology. Organization of Communities and Ecosystems), Moscow: Tovar. Nauch. Izd. KMK, 2006.Google Scholar
  8. Burkovskii, I.V., Stolyarov, A.P., and Kolobov, M.Yu., Spatial organization and functioning of a marine (estuarine) littoral ecosystem, Usp. Sovrem. Biol., 2002, vol. 122, no. 4, pp. 316–325.Google Scholar
  9. Burkovskii, I.V. and Stolyarov, A.P., Spatial and temporal organization of saline marsh communities in the White Sea, Vestnik MGU, Ser. Biol., 2001, no. 1, pp. 34–41.Google Scholar
  10. Day, J.W, Hall, C.A.S., Kemp, W.M., and Yáñez-Arancibia, A., Estuarine Ecology, New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1989.Google Scholar
  11. Dennison, W.C., Thomas, J.E., Cain, C.J., Carruthers, T.J.B., Hall, M.R., et al., Shifting sands: environmental and cultural change, in Maryland’s Coastal Bays, Cambridge, MD: IAN Press, 2009. ISBN 978-0-9822305-0-3.Google Scholar
  12. Gaston, G.R. and Nasci, J.C., Trophic structure of macrobenthic communities in the Calcasieu Estuary, Louisiana, Estuaries, 1988, vol. 11, pp. 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Junoy, J. and Vietez, J.M., Macrozoobenthic community structure in the Ria de Foz, an intertidal estuary (Galicia, Northwest Spain), Mar. Biol., 1990, vol. 107, pp. 329–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Khaitov, V.M., Artem’eva, A.V., Gornykh, A.E., Zhizhina, O.G., and Yakovis, E.L., The role of mussel druses in structuring communities of silty-sandy beaches. II. Community formation in experiment, Vestn. S.-Peterb. Univ., Ser. 3, 2007, no. 4, pp. 13–26.Google Scholar
  15. Khlebovich, V.V., Kriticheskaya solenost’ biologicheskikh protsessov (Critical Salinity of Biological Processes), Leningrad: Nauka, 1974.Google Scholar
  16. Khlebovich, V.V., Critical salinity and chorohalinicum: an update of concepts, Trudy Zool. Inst. AN SSSR, 1989, vol. 196, pp. 5–11.Google Scholar
  17. Khlebovich, V.V., Ekologiya osobi (ocherki fenotipicheskikh adaptatsii zhivotnykh) (Ecology of an Individual (Essays on the Phenotypic Adaptations of Animals)), St. Petersburg: ZIN RAN, 2012.Google Scholar
  18. Kjerfve B., Coastal Lagoons, Chapter 1, in Coastal Lagoon Processes, Kjerfve, B., Ed., Elsevier Oceanography Series, Amsterdam, 1994, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
  19. Kristensen, E., Penha-Lopes, G., Delefosse, M., Valdemarsen, T., Quintana, C.O., and Banta, G.T., What is bioturbation? The need for a precise definition for fauna in aquatic sciences, Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser., 2012, vol. 446, pp. 285–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kuznetsov, A.P., Data on the study of Ermolinskaya Bay (Kandalaksha Bay, White Sea) as an ecosystem. Part I. The benthic fauna, in Trudy Instituta okeanologii AN SSSR (Proceedings of the Institute of Oceanology of the USSR Academy of Sciences), Moscow: Nauka, 1970, vol. 88, pp. 98–112.Google Scholar
  21. Labai, V.S., The evolution of benthic coastal lagoons of Sakhalin Island: causes and consequences, in Chteniya pamyati Vladimira Yakovlevicha Levanidova (V.Ya. Levanidov Memo rial Lectures), Vladivostok: Dal’nauka, 2011, no. 5, pp. 265–274.Google Scholar
  22. Lisitsyn, A.P., Marginal filters and biofilters of the World Ocean, in Okeanologiya na starte 21 veka (Oceanology at the Turn of the 21st Century), Moscow: Nauka, 2008, pp. 159–224.Google Scholar
  23. Lopez, G.R. and Levinton, J.S., Ecology of deposit-feeding animals in marine sediments, Quart. Rev. Biol., 1987, vol. 62, pp. 235–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lukanin, V.V., Naumov, A.D., and Fedyakov, V.V., Dynamics of size structure of populations of the mussel (Mytilus edulis L.) of the White Sea, in Ekologicheskie issledovaniya donnykh organizmov Belogo morya (Ecological Studies of Benthic Organisms of the White Sea), Leningrad: ZIN AN SSSR, 1986, pp. 50–63.Google Scholar
  25. Meire, P., Ysebaert, T., Van Damme, S., Bergh, E., Maris, T., and Struyf, E., The Scheldt estuary: a description of a changing ecosystem, Hydrobiologia, 2005, vol. 540, pp. 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Montagna, P.A., Palmer, T.A., and Pollack, J.B., Hydrological Changes and Estuarine Dynamics, Springer Briefs in Environmental Science, 2013, vol. 8. doi 10.1007/978-1-4614-5833-3Google Scholar
  27. Neiman, A.A. and Karpinskii, M.G., Impact of trophic relations in the offshore community on the benthos: trophic structure and the impact of grazing, Zh. Sib. Feder. Univ. Biol., 2013, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 368–387.Google Scholar
  28. Pianka, E.R., Niche overlap and diffuse competition, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 1974, vol. 71, pp. 2141–2145.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Pritchard, D.W., What is an estuary: physical view point, in Estuaries, Lauff, G.H., Ed., Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science Publ., 1967, no. 83, pp. 3–5.Google Scholar
  30. Romanenko, F.A. and Shilova, O.S., The postglacial uplift of the Karelian coast of the White Sea according to radiocarbon and diatom analyses of lacustrine-boggy deposits of Kindo Peninsula, Dokl. Earth Sci., 2012, vol. 442, no. 4, pp. 242–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Saf’yanov, G.A., Geomorfologiya morskikh beregov (The Geomorphology of Sea Coasts), Moscow: MGU im. M.V. Lomonosova, 1996.Google Scholar
  32. Sergienko, L.A., Sea coast and coastal march vegetation, in Atlas biologicheskogo raznoobraziya morei i poberezhii rossiiskoi Arktiki (Atlas of Biodiversity of Seas and Coastlines of the Russian Arctic), Spiridonov, V.A., Gavrilo, M.V., Krasnov, E.D., and Nikolaev, N.G., Eds., Moscow: WWF Rossii, 2011, pp. 40–43.Google Scholar
  33. Shannon, C. and Weaver, W., The Mathematical Theory of Communication, Urbana: Univ. Illinois Press, 1949.Google Scholar
  34. Sørensen, T.A., A new method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of a species content and its application to analysis of the vegetation on Danish commons, Kgl. Dan. Videnskab. Selskab. Biol. Skr., 1948, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1–34.Google Scholar
  35. Stolyarov, A.P., Spatial and temporal changes in the structure of macrobenthos of the Lapshagino Estuary (Kandalaksha Bay, White Sea), Usp. Sovrem. Biol., 2010, vol. 130, no. 3, pp. 286–295.Google Scholar
  36. Stolyarov, A.P. Structural and functional organization of the White Sea estuarine ecosystems: a prototypical model, Usp. Sovrem. Biol., 2012, vol. 132, no. 4, pp. 354–369.Google Scholar
  37. Stolyarov, A.P., Some features of the macrobenthos community structure in estuary ecosystems (Kandalaksha Bay, the White Sea), Biol. Bull. Rev., 2013, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 505–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stolyarov, A.P., Macrobenthos of the estuarine ecosystem of Gryaznaya Bay (Kandalaksha Bay, the White Sea): spatial structure and diversity, Zool. Zh., 2015, vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 623–633.Google Scholar
  39. Stolyarov, A.P. and Burkovskii, I.V., Features of the structural organization of the ecosystem of the estuary and functional interdependence of its components (Kandalaksha Bay, the White Sea), Usp. Sovrem. Biol., 2005, vol. 125, no. 6, pp. 579–592.Google Scholar
  40. Stolyarov, A.P. and Burkovskii, I.V., Spatial structure of macrobenthic communities and their productivity in the mussel bed area of the Chernaya River estuary (Kandalaksha Bay, the White Sea), Usp. Sovrem. Biol., 2006, vol. 126, no. 6, pp. 569–586.Google Scholar
  41. Trush, S.F. and Townsend, C.R., The sublittoral macrobenthic community composition of Lough Hyne, Ireland, Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 1986, vol. 23, pp. 551–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Udalov, A.A., Burkovskii, I.V., Mokievskii, V.O., Stolyarov, A.P., Mazei, Yu.A., et al., Changes in the general characteristics of micro-, meio-, and macrobenthos along the salinity gradient in the White Sea estuary, Okeanology, 2004, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 514–523.Google Scholar
  43. De Wit, R., Biodiversity of coastal lagoon ecosystems and their vulnerability to global change, in Ecosystems Biodiversity, Grillo, O. and Venore, G., Eds., Rijeka, Croatia: In Tech, 2011, chapter 2, pp. 29–40.Google Scholar
  44. Zdanovich, V.V. and Kriksunov, E.A., Gidrobiologiya i obshchaya ekologiya: slovar’ terminov (Hydrobiology and General Ecology: a Glossary of Terms), Moscow: Drofa, 2004.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyMoscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations