Advertisement

Biology Bulletin

, Volume 39, Issue 1, pp 85–92 | Cite as

Microbiological diagnostics of soil stage in the phyllosphere of the woodland ecosystem of Siberia

  • N. D. Sorokin
  • E. N. Afanasova
Ecology

Abstract

It is shown that the diagnostics of the stage of woodland soils affected by wildfires and forest cuts can be determined by the evaluation indexes of the range of the scale of abundance of typical ecologic-and-trophic groups of microorganisms (ECTGM), microbiological activity coefficients, reserve and abundance fluctuations, and metabolism. The degree of impact of the technogenic emissions on the forest cover, soil, and phyllosphere according to ECTGM abundance on the diagnostic environments and their fermentative activity is expressed with the help of an advisability functional relation.

Keywords

Forest Cover Biology Bulletin Desirability Function Larch Forest Ambrosia Beetle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Afanasova, E.N. and Pashenova, N.V., Relationships of Ophiostoma Fungi Carried by Xylophagous Insects between Themselves and Other Micromycetes of Conifers of Siberia, Mikol. Fitopatol., 2005, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 62–65.Google Scholar
  2. Anan’eva, N.D., Mikrobiologicheskie aspekty samoochishcheniya i ustoichivosti pochv (Microbiological Aspects of Self-Purification and Soil Stability), Moscow: Nauka, 2003.Google Scholar
  3. Anan’eva, N.D., Blagodatskaya, E.V., and Demkina, G.S., Estimating the Resistance of Soil Microbial Complexes to Natural and Anthropogenic Impacts, Eur. Soil Sci., 2002, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 514–521.Google Scholar
  4. Anan’eva, N.D., Blagodatskaya, E.V., and Oraipskii, D.B., Methodological Aspects of the Use of the Rate of the Substrate-Induced Respiration of Soil Microorganisms, Pochvovedenie, 1993, no. 11, pp. 72–77.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, T.H. and Domsh, K.H., A Physiological Method for the Quantitative Measurement of Microbial Biomass in Soil, Soil Biol. Biochem., 1978, no. 10, pp. 215–221.Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, T.H. and Domsh, K.H., The Metabolic Quotient for CO2 (qCO2) as a Specific Activity Parameter to Assess the Effects of Environmental Condition on the Microbial Biomass of Forest Soil, Soil Biol. Biochem., 1993, no. 25, pp. 393–395.Google Scholar
  7. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, Holt, J., Krieg, N.R., Sneath, P.H.A., Staley, J.T., and Williams, S.T., Eds., 9th ed., Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1994. Translated under the title: Opredelitel’ bakterii Berdzhi, Moscow: Mir, 1997, vol. 1.Google Scholar
  8. Dobrovol’skaya, T.G., Struktura bakterial’nykh soobshchestv pochv (The Structure of Soil Bacterial Communities), Moscow: Akademkniga, 2002.Google Scholar
  9. Dobrovol’skaya, T.G., Skvortsova, I.N., and Lysak, L.V., Metody vydeleniya i identifikatsii pochvennykh bakterii (Methods for Isolation and Identification of Soil Bacteria), Moscow: Izd. MGU, 1989.Google Scholar
  10. Fedorov, V.D., Assessment of Priority in a Series of Pollutants, in Vsestoronnii analiz okruzhayushchei prirodnoi sredy. Tr. III Sov.-Amer. Simpoz. (Comprehensive Analysis of the Environment. Proc. III Soviet-Amer. Sympos.), Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1978, pp. 138–145.Google Scholar
  11. Fedorov, V.D., Principles of Organization of Biological Monitoring, in Izuchenie zagryazneniya okruzhayushchei prirodnoi sredy i ego vliyanie na biosferu (Study of Environmental Pollution and Its Impact on the Biosphere), Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1979, pp. 8–14.Google Scholar
  12. Gorlenko, M.V., Functional Biodiversity of Soil Microorganisms: Approaches to Assessment, in Perspektivy razvitiya pochvennoi biologii (Prospects of Development of Soil Biology), Moscow: Nauka, 2001, pp. 228–234.Google Scholar
  13. Guzev, V.S., Environmental Assessment of Anthropogenic Impacts on the Soil Microbial System, Extended Abstract of Doctoral (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow: Moscow State Univ., 1988.Google Scholar
  14. Krasil’nikov, N.A., Opredelitel’ bakterii i aktinomitsetov (Bacteria and Actinomycetes: An Identification Guide), Moscow: Izd. AN SSSR, 1949.Google Scholar
  15. Maksimov, V.N., Specific Problem of Studying the Combined Effect of Pollutants on a Biological Systems, Gidrobiol. Zh., 1977, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 34–35.Google Scholar
  16. Metody pochvennoi mikrobiologii i biokhimii (Methods of Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry), Zvyagintsev, D.G., Eds., Moscow: Izd. Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1991.Google Scholar
  17. Metody statsionarnogo izucheniya pochv (Methods of Stationary Study of Soils), Moscow: Nauka, 1977.Google Scholar
  18. Nikitina, Z.I., Mikrobiologicheskii monitoring nazemnykh ekosistem (Microbiological Monitoring of Terrestrial Ecosystems), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1991.Google Scholar
  19. Pashenova, N.V., Vetrova, V.P., Matrenina, R.M., and Afanasova, E.N., Ophiostoma Fungi in Holes of the Larch Bark Beetle, Lesovedenie, 1995, no. 6, pp. 61–67.Google Scholar
  20. Skvortsova, I.N., Identifikatsiya pochvennykh bakterii (Identification of Soil Bacteria), Moscow: Izd. MGU, 1983.Google Scholar
  21. Sorokin, N.D., Mikrobiologicheskaya diagnostika lesorastitel’nogo sostoyaniya pochv Srednei Sibiri (Microbiological Diagnostics of the Forest Conditions of Soils in Central Siberia), Novosibirsk: Izd. Sib. Otd. Ros. Akad. Nauk, 2009.Google Scholar
  22. Sorokin, N.D., Ecological Patterns of Microflora Development in Soils of the Southern Taiga of Central Siberia, Extended Abstract of Doctoral (Biol.) Dissertation, Krasnoyarsk: Inst. Lesa Sib. Otd. Ros. Akad. Nauk, 1990.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sukachev Institute of Forestry, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesKrasnoyarskRussia
  2. 2.Siberian Federal UniversityKrasnoyarskRussia

Personalised recommendations