Advertisement

Biology Bulletin

, Volume 37, Issue 9, pp 952–958 | Cite as

The role of a social factor in exploration of a novel environment in great tits (Parus major) under conditions of limited space

  • T. A. Ilyina
  • E. V. Ivankina
  • A. B. Kerimov
Article

Abstract

Sequential tests in an open field (OF) and in an aviary were performed to study the exploration behavior of great tits, Parus major Each aviary of 2×2×2 m included a standard set of objects: trees, feeder, and shelters. Twenty-four aviaries included a single individual, and 49 aviaries included two heterosexual individuals. During the 15-min observation, a number of explored objects, the latent exploration period of each object (the time period from the start of observation to the first visit of each object), and the time period to the onset of feeding were recorded. The exploration rate of each individual was characterized by the sum of all latent periods (CLP). No association between the cumulative locomotor activities in OF and in an aviary was found. Probably, in the complex environment of an aviary, the frequency of directed actions increases, competing with the movement activity. Faster individuals in OF showed a shorter CLP; i.e., they were fast explorers. The exploration rate of a novel environment in the presence of socid partner was unrelated to exploration scores in OF. Interrelations of birds combined in an aviary were dependent on combinations of personality characteristics identified in OF.

Keywords

great tit Parus major personality type social interactions response to novelty 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bakker, T.C.M. and Sevenster, P., Changes in the Sexual Tendency Accompagnying Selection for Aggressiveness in the Three-Spined Stickleback, Gasterosterus aculeatus L., J. Fish. Biol., 1989, vol. 34, pp. 233–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnard, C.J. and Sibley, R.M., Producers and Scrounders: A General Model and Its Application to Captive Flocks of House Sparrows, Anim. Behav., 1981, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 543–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolnick, D.I., Svanback, R., Fordyce, J.A., Yang, L.H., Davis, J.M., et al., The Ecology of Individuals: Incidence and Implications of Individual Specialization, Am. Nat., 2003, vol. 161, no. 1, pp. 1–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Both, C., Dingemanse, N.J., Drent, P.J., and Tinbergen, J.M., Reproductive Success and Great Tit Personalities, in Natural Selection and Avian Personality in a Fluctuating Environment, Ph. D. Thesis of N.J. Dingemanse, Utrecht, the Netherlands: Utrecht University, 2003, pp. 59–70.Google Scholar
  5. Built, A. and Lynch, C.B., Breaking through Artificial Selection Limits of an Adaptive Behavior in Mice and the Consequences for Correlated Responses, Behav. Genet., 2000, vol. 30, pp. 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dingemanse, N.J. and de Goede, P., Winter Dominance and Avian Personality in the Wild, in Natural Selection and Avian Personality in a Fluctuating Environment, Ph. D. Thesis of N.J. Dingemanse, Utrecht, the Netherlands: Utrecht University, 2003, pp. 33–46.Google Scholar
  7. Dingemanse, N.J., Both, C., Drent, P.J., van Oers, K., and van Noordwijk, A.J., Repeatability and Heritability of Exploratory Behaviour in Great Tits from the Wild, Anim. Behav., 2002, vol. 64, pp. 929–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Drent, P.J. and Marchetti, C., Individuality, Exploration and Foraging in Hand Raised Juvenile Great Tits, Proceedings of the 22nd International Ornithological Congress, Durban, 1999, pp. 896–914.Google Scholar
  9. Drent, P.J., van Oers, K., and van Noordwijk, A.J., Realized Heritability of Personalities in the Great Tit (Parus major), Proc. Roy. Soc. London: Ser. B, 2003, vol. 270, pp. 45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fidler, A.E., van Oers, K., Drent, P.J., Kuhn, S., Mueller, J.C., and Kempenaers, B., Drd4 Gene Polymorphisms Are Associated with Personality Variation in a Passerine Bird, Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. B, 2007, vol. 274, pp. 1685–1691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gluk, E., Flock Size and Habitat-Dependent Food and Energy Intake of Foraging Goldfinches, Oecologia, 1986, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 149–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ilyina, T.A., Ivankina, E.V., and Kerimov, A.B., Is It Possible to Predict Successful Marriage? Spatial Factors and Individual Characteristics Affecting Breeding in Captive, Abstracts 5th Conf. of the European Ornithologists’ Union, Strasbourg, August 20–23, 2005, Alauda, 2005, vol. 73, no. 3, p. 237.Google Scholar
  13. Ilyina, T.A., Kerimov, A.B., and Ivankina, E.V., Preferable Distance As an Indicator of Social relationships in Great Tits (Parus major), Zool. Zh., 2009, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 71–77.Google Scholar
  14. Kerimov, A.B., Ivankina, E.V., Ilyina, T.A., and Visser, M.E., The Relation between Basal Metabolic Rate and Reproductive Performance in Great Tit, Parus major, Abstr. 4th Conf. of the European Ornithologists’ Union, Chemnitz, Germany, August 16–21, 2003, Vogelwarte, 2003, vol. 42, nos. 1–2, p. 125.Google Scholar
  15. Lazarus, J., Flock Size and Behaviour in Captive Red-Billed Weaverbirds (Quelea quelea): Implications for Social Facilitation and the Functions of Flocking, Behaviour, 1979, vol. 71, nos. 1–2, pp. 127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pulliam, H.M. and Millikan, C.C., Social Organization in the Non-Reproductive Season, Avian Biol. 1982, vol. 6, pp. 169–197.Google Scholar
  17. Shilov, I.A., Ekologo-fiziologicheskie osnovy populyatsionnykh otnoshenii u zhivotnykh (Ecophysiological Bases of Population Relationships in Animals), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1977.Google Scholar
  18. Sluyter, F., Bult, A., Lynch, C.B., Van Oortmerssen, G.A.., and Koolhaas, J.M., A Comparison between House Mouse Lines Selected for Attack Altency or Nest Building: Evidence for a Genetic Basis for Alternative Behavioral Strategies, Behav. Genet., 1995, vol. 25, pp. 247–252.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Trut, L.N., Early Canid Domestication: the Farm-Fox Experiment, Am. Sci., 1999, vol. 87, pp. 160–169.Google Scholar
  20. Van Oers, K., On Genetics of Avian Personalities: Structure and Evolution of Complex Behavioural Traits, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Utrecht, 2003.Google Scholar
  21. Van Oers, K., de Jong, G., Drent, P.J., and van Noordwijk, A.J., A Genetic Analysis of Avian Personality Traits: Correlated Response to Artificial Selection, Behav. Genet., 2004, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 611–619.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Van Oers, K., de Jong, G., van Noordwijk, A.J., Kempenaers, B., and Drent, P.J., Contribution of Genetics to the Study of Animal Personalities: A Review of Case Studies, Behaviour, 2005a, vol. 142, pp. 1191–1212.Google Scholar
  23. Van Oers, K., Klunder, M., and Drent, P.J., Context Dependence of Personalities: Risk-Taking Behavior in a Social and a Nonsocial Situation, Behav. Ecol., 2005b, vol. 16, pp. 716–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Van Oers, K., Drent, P.J., Dingemanse, N.J., and Kempenaers, B., Personality Is Associated with Extrapair Paternity in Great Tits, Parus major, Anim. Behav., 2008, vol. 6, pp. 555–563.Google Scholar
  25. Verbeek, M.E.M., Boon, A., and Drent, P.J., Exploration, Aggressive Behaviour and Dominance in Pairwise Confrontations of Juvenile Male Great Tits, Behaviour, 1996, vol. 133, pp. 945–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Verbeek, M.E.M., De Goede, P., Drent, P.J., and Wiepkema, P.R., Individual Behavioural Characteristics and Dominance in Aviary Groups of Great Tits, Behaviour, 1999, vol. 136, pp. 23–48.Google Scholar
  27. Zaykin, D.V. and Pudovkin, A.I., Two Programs to Estimate Significance of Chi-Square Values Using Pseudo-Probability Test, J. Hered., 1993, vol. 84, p. 152.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. A. Ilyina
    • 1
  • E. V. Ivankina
    • 1
  • A. B. Kerimov
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of BiologyMoscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations