Advertisement

Biology Bulletin

, Volume 36, Issue 5, pp 479–488 | Cite as

Interactions of partners in family pairs, care of the offspring, and the role of tactile stimulation in formation of parental behavior of the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus) under laboratory conditions

  • V. S. Gromov
Zoology

Abstract

The interactions of sexual partners and care of the offspring in male and female Mongolian gerbils reared in biparental and uniparental family groups (without an adult male) were compared. In individuals reared in biparental family groups, sexual differences related to the manifestation of parental care were small and statistically insignificant. In individuals reared in uniparental groups, the interactions of sexual partners related to grooming changed; the duration in males decreased threefold, as compared to the norm; indices of parental behavior of females and, especially of males, related to tactile stimulation of pups (huddling with pups in the nest and duration of licking pups) also decreased. The importance of the parental contribution of males, especially of tactile stimulation, in the evolution of the family-group mode of life is discussed.

Keywords

Biology Bulletin Family Group Tactile Stimulation Mongolian Gerbil Prairie Vole 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burda, H., Constraints of Pregnancy and Evolution of Sociality in Mole-Rats, Z. Zool. Syst. Evolut.-forsh, 1990, vol. 28, pp. 26–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Clark, M.M., Desousa, D., Vonk, J., and Galef, B.G., Parenting and Potency: Alternative Routes to Reproductive Success in Male Mongolian Gerbils, Anim. Behav., 1997, vol. 54, pp. 635–642.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clutton-Brock, T.Y., The Evolution of Parental Care, Princeton, New Jersey: Prin. Univ. Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  4. Cramer, C.P., Experience During Suckling Increases Weight and Volume of Rat Hippocampus, Brain Res., 1988, vol. 470, pp. 151–155.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Digby, L.J., Social Organization in a Wild Population of Callitrix jacchus: II. Intragroup Social Behavior, Primates, 1995, vol. 36, pp. 361–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dudley, D., Contributions of Paternal Care to the Growth and Development of the Young in Peromyscus californicus, Behav. Neural Biol., 1974, vol. 11, pp. 155–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ebensperger, L.A., Sociality in Rodents: The New World Fossorial Hystricognaths as Study Model, Rev. Chilena Hist. Nat., 1998, vol. 71, pp. 65–77.Google Scholar
  8. Elwood, R.W, in Paternal Behaviour of Rodents, Elwood, R.W., Ed., Chichester: Wiley, 1983, pp. 235–257.Google Scholar
  9. Elwood, R.W. and Broom, D.M., The Influence of Bedding Size and Parental Behaviour on the Development of Mongolian Gerbil Pups, Anim. Behav., 1978, vol. 26, pp. 438–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elwood, R.W., Paternal and Maternal Behaviour in the Mongolian Gerbil, Anim. Behav., 1975, vol. 23, pp. 766–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Emlen, S.T., Benefits, Constraints and the Evolution of the Family, Trends Ecol. Evol., 1994, vol. 9, pp. 282–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Francis, D., Diorio, J., Liu, D., and Meany, M.J., Nongenomic Transmission across Generations of Maternal Behavior and Stress Responses in the Rat, Science, 1999, vol. 286, pp. 1155–1158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gonzalez, A., Lovic, V., Ward, G.R., et al., Intergenerational Effects of Complete Maternal Deprivation and Replacement Stimulation on Maternal Behaviour and Emotionality in Female Rats, Develop. Psychobiol., 2001, vol. 38, pp. 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gromov, V.S. and Popov, S.V., Specific Spatial-Ethological Structure of Mongolian Gerbil Settlements and Attempts to Affect It by Drugs, Zool. Zh., 1979, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 1528–1535.Google Scholar
  15. Gromov, V.S., Etologicheskie mekhanizmy populyatsionnogo gomeostaza u peschanok (Mammalia, Rodentia) (Etological Mechanisms of Population Homeostasis in Gerbils (Mammalia, Rodentia)), Moscow: IPEE RAN, 2000.Google Scholar
  16. Gromov, V.S., Prostranstvenno-etologicheskaya struktura populyatsii gryzunov (The Spatial-Ethological Structure of Rodent Populations), Moscow: Tovarishch. Nauch. Izd. KMK, 2008.Google Scholar
  17. Gromov, V.S., Parental Care in Captive Brandt Vole (Lasiopodomys brandti), Rus. J. Theriol., 2005, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 137–145.Google Scholar
  18. Gromov, V.S., Parental Behavior of the Social Vole (Microtus socialis) under Laboratory Conditions, Zool. Zh., 2007, vol. 86, no. 11, pp. 1001–1009.Google Scholar
  19. Gromov, V.S., Family and Group Mode of Life and Territorialism in Mongolian Gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus), in Povedenie i kommunikatsiya mlekopitayushchikh (Behavior and Communication of Mammals), Moscow: Nauka, 1992, pp. 76–114.Google Scholar
  20. Gromov, V.S., Social Organization of Family Groups of Mongolian Gerbil in Natural Settlements, Zool. Zh., 1981, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 1683–1693.Google Scholar
  21. Gromov, V.S., Surov, A.V., and Ryurikov, G.B., Maternal Care in Captive Grey Hamster Cricetulus migratorius, Rus. J. Theriol., 2006, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 73–77.Google Scholar
  22. Gromov, V.S., Types of Spatial-Etological Structure of Rodent Populations, Zool. Zh., 2005, vol. 84, no. 8, pp. 1003–1014.Google Scholar
  23. Hofer, M.A, in Perspectives in Ethology, Bateson, P.P.G. and Klopfer, P.H., Eds., New York: Plenum Press, 1978, pp. 135–166.Google Scholar
  24. Hoogland, J.L., The Black-Tailed Prairie Dog: Social Life of a Burrowing Mammal, Chicago: Chic. Univ. Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  25. Hutchison, J.B. and Steimer, T., Androgen Metabolism in the Brain: Behavioral Correlates, Prog. Brain Res., 1984, vol. 61, pp. 23–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Insel, T.A., Neurobiological Basis of Social Attachment, Am. J. Psychiatry, 1997, vol. 154, pp. 726–735.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Insel, T.R, in Mammalian Parenting, Drasnegor, N.A. and Bridges, R.S., Eds., New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1990, pp. 260–280.Google Scholar
  28. Jannett, F.J., Nesting Patterns of Adult Voles, Microtus montanus, in Field Populations, J. Mammal., 1982, vol. 63, pp. 495–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jannett, F.J., Sex Ratios in High Density Populations of the Montane Vole, Microtus montanus, and the Behavior of Territorial Males, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 1981, vol. 8, pp. 297–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jannett, F.J., Social Dynamics of the Montane Vole, Microtus montanus, as a Paradigm, Biologist, 1980, vol. 62, pp. 3–19.Google Scholar
  31. Kruchenkova, E.P. and Gol’tsman, M.E., Relationships between Parents and Pups of the Greater Gerbil under Experimental Conditions, Mater. Vsesoyuzn. Soveshch. “Ekologiya I Meditsinskoe Znachenie Peschanok Fauny SSSR” (Ashkhabad, 1977) (Proc. All-Union Congr. “Ecology and Medical Significance of Gerbils in the Fauna of the USSR” (Ashkhabad, 1977)), Ashkhabad, 1977, pp. 207–208.Google Scholar
  32. Liu, D., Diorio, J., Tannenbaum, B., et al., Maternal Care, Hippocampal Glucocorticoid Receptors, and Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Responses to Stress, Science, 1997, vol. 277, pp. 1659–1662.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lovegrove, B.G. and Wissel, J., Sociality in Mole-Rats: Metabolic Scaling and the Role of Risk Sensitivity, Oecologia, 1988, vol. 74, pp. 600–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McCarty, R. and Southwick, C.H., Patterns of Parental Care in Two Cricetid Rodents, Onychomys torridus and Peromyscus leucopus, Anim. Behav., 1977, vol. 25, pp. 945–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McGuire, B. and Novak, H.A., Comparison of Maternal Behaviour in the Meadow Vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus), Prairie Vole (M. ochrogaster), and Pine Vole (M. pinetorum), Anim. Behav., 1984, vol. 32, pp. 1132–1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McGuire, B. and Novak, M., Parental Care and Its Relation to Social Organization in the Montane Vole, J. Mammal., 1986, vol. 67, pp. 305–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McGuire, B., Effects of Cross-Fostering on Parental Behaviour of Meadow Voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus), J. Mammal., 1988, vol. 69, pp. 332–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nelson, E. and Panksepp, J., Brain Substrates of Infant-Mother Attachment: Contributions of Opioids, Oxytocin and Norephinephrin, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 1998, vol. 22, pp. 437–452.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Numan, M., in The Physiology of Reproduction, Knobil, E. and Neill, J.D., Eds., New York: Raven Press, 1994, pp. 221–302.Google Scholar
  40. Oliveras, D. and Novak, H.A., Comparison of Paternal Behavior in the Meadow Vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus, the Pine Vole, Microtus pinetorum, and Prairie Vole, Microtus ochrogaster, Anim. Behav., 1986, vol. 34, pp. 519–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pascual, R. and Figueroa, H., Effects of Preweaning Sensorimotor Stimulation on Behavioral and Neuronal Development in Motor and Visual Cortex of the Rat, Biol. Neonate, 1996, vol. 69, pp. 399–404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Post, R.M., Weiss, S.R., Li, H., et al., Neural Plasticity and Emotional Memory, Develop. Psychopathol., 1998, vol. 10, pp. 829–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reburn, C.J. and Winne-Edwards, K.E., Hormonal Changes in Males of a Naturally Biparental and a Uniparental Mammal, Horm. Behav., 1989, vol. 35, pp. 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Roberts, R.L., Williams, J.R., Wang, A.K., and Carter, C.S., Cooperative Breeding and Monogamy in Prairie Voles: Influence of the Sire and Geographic Variation, Anim. Behav., 1998, vol. 55, pp. 1131–1140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rosenzweig, M.R. and Bennet, E.L., Psychobiology of Plasticity: Effects of Training and Experience on Brain and Behavior, Behav. Brain Res., 1996, vol. 78, pp. 57–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smorkatcheva, A.V., Parental Care in the Captive Mandarin Vole, Lasiopodomys mandarinus, Can. J. Zool., 2003, vol. 81, pp. 1339–1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F.J., Biometry, 3rd ed., New York: Plenum, 1995.Google Scholar
  48. Sokolov, V.E. and Vasil’eva, N.Yu., Heterospecific Social Factors Affecting the Rate of Sexual Maturation of Juveniles of Phodopus campbelli Thomas, 1905: The Role of Crossbreeding and of the Secretion of the Median Abdominal Gland of Males of Phodopus sungorous Pallas, 1773, Dokl. Akad. Nauk, 1996, vol. 350, no. 4, pp. 571–574.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Sokolov, V.E., Vasil’eva, N.Yu., and Zinkevich, E.P., The Earlier Unknown Function of Specific Skin Glands and the Role of Midventral Gland Secretion of Male Campbell Hamster (Phodopus campbelli Thomas, 1905) in the Regulation of Sexual Maturation of Offspring, in Problemy khimicheskoi kommunikatsii zhivotnykh (Problems of Chemical Communication of Animals), Moscow: Nauka, 1991, pp. 415–435.Google Scholar
  50. Solomon, N.G., Comparison of Parental Behaviour in Male and Female Prairie Voles (Microtus ochrogacter), Can. J. Zool., 1993, vol. 71, pp. 434–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vasil’eva, N.Yu., Khrushchova, A.M., and Parfenova, V.M., Effects of Male Stimuli on the Rate of Sexual Maturation of Offspring of the Djungarian Hamster Phodorus sungorus, in Mater. mezhdunar. soveshch. “Teriofauna Rossii i sopredel’nykh territorii” (Moskva, 6–7 fevralya 2003) (Proc. Int. Conf. “Theriofauna of Russia and Adjacent Areas (Moscow, February 6–7, 2003), Moscow, 2003, pp. 69–70.Google Scholar
  52. Xia, X. and Millar, J.S., Paternal Behavior by Peromyscus leucopus in Enclosures, Can. J. Zool., 1988, vol. 66, pp. 1184–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Severtsov Institute of Ecology and EvolutionMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations