Advertisement

Journal of Analytical Chemistry

, Volume 74, Issue 11, pp 1135–1139 | Cite as

Expansion of Analytical Possibilities of Capillary Electrophoresis in Chemical Technological Control

  • M. Ya. KamentsevEmail author
  • N. M. Yakimova
  • L. N. Moskvin
REVIEWS
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

Works on the expansion of analytical possibilities of capillary electrophoresis in technological control are considered. The main areas are the development of new approaches to on-line preconcentration for increasing the sensitivity of the determination of trace contaminants in aqueous media by capillary electrophoresis; expansion of the list of analytes; and study of the possibilities of the method in the field of isotope analysis in the control of the isotopic composition of technological media.

Keywords:

capillary electrophoresis technological control aqueous media trace contaminants isotope analysis 

Notes

FUNDING

This work was financial supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 16-13-10117-P.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    GOST (State Standard) 31869-2012: Water. Methods for the Determination of Cations (Ammonium, Barium, Potassium, Calcium, Lithium, Magnesium, Sodium, Strontium) Content Using Capillary Electrophoresis, Moscow: Standartinform, 2013.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    GOST (State Standard) 31867-2012: Drinking Water. Determination of Anions Content by Chromatography and Capillary Electrophoresis Method, Moscow: Standartinform, 2014.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kamencev, M., Komarova, N., and Morozova, O., Chromatographia, 2016, vol. 79, p. 927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ermolenko, Yu., Anshakova, A., Osipova, N., Kamentsev, M., Maksimenko, O., Balabanyan, V., and Gelperina, S., J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods, 2017, vol. 85, p. 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moskvin, L.N. and Rodinkov, O.V., Theor. Found. Chem. Eng., 2016, vol. 50, p. 655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vakh, C., Freze, E., Pochivalov, A., Evdokimova, E., Kamencev, M., Moskvin, L., and Bulatov, A., J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods, 2015, vol. 73, p. 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nugbienyo, L., Malinina, Y., Garmonov, S., Kamencev, M., Salahov, I., Andruch, V., Moskvin, L., and Bulatov, A., Talanta, 2017, vol. 167, p. 709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kirsanov, D., Panchuk, V., Goydenko, A., Khaydukova, M., Semenov, V., and Legin, A., Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 2015, vol. 113, p. 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ganeev, A.A., Gubal’, A.R., Mosichev, V.I., Pershin, N.V., Petrov, S.N., Potapov, S.V., and Uskov, K.N., J. Anal. Chem., 2011, vol. 66, p. 1411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crego, A.L. and Marina, M.L., Compr. Anal. Chem., 2005, vol. 45, p. 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Novo, P. and Janasek, D., Anal. Chim. Acta, 2017, vol. 991, p. 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kodama, S., Yamamoto, A., Aizawa, S., Honda, Y., Suzuki, K., Kemmei, T., and Taga, A., Electrophoresis, 2012, vol. 33, p. 2920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Breadmore, M.C., Electrophoresis, 2017, vol. 38, p. 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Slampova, A., Mala, Z., Gebauer, P., and Bocek, P., Electrophoresis, 2017, vol. 38, p. 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kamentsev, M.Ya., Mamedova, S.N., Yakimova, N.M., and Moskvin, L.N., J. Anal. Chem., 2015, vol. 70, no. 2, p. 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Johns, C., Macka, M., and Haddad, P.R., Electrophoresis, 2003, vol. 24, p. 2150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Doble, P., Macka, M., and Haddad, P.R., TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem., 2000, vol. 19, p. 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Malinina, Yu., Kamentsev, M.Ya., Moskvin, L.N., Yakimova, N.M., and Kuchumova, I.D., J. Anal. Chem., 2017, vol. 72, p. 1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kamentsev, M.Ya., Moskvin, L.N., Malinina, Y., Yakimova, N.M., and Kuchumova, I.D., J. Anal. Chem., 2016, vol. 71, p. 912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Malinina, J., Kamencev, M., Tkach, K., Yakimova, N., Kuchumova, I., and Moskvin, L., Microchem. J., 2018, vol. 137, p. 208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Malik, J.I., Mirza, N.M., and Mirza, S.M., Prog. Nucl. Energy, 2012, vol. 58, p. 100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Terabe, S. and Yashima, T., Anal. Chem., 1988, vol. 60, p. 491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bushey, M.M. and Jorgenson, J.W., Anal. Chem., 1989, vol. 61, p. 491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kamencev, M., Yakimova, N., Moskvin, L., Kuchumova, I., Tkach, K., and Malinina, Y., Electrophoresis, 2016, vol. 37, p. 3017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kamencev, M., Yakimova, N., Moskvin, L., Kuchumova, I., Tkach, K., Malinina, Y., and Tungusov, O., Electrophoresis, 2015, vol. 36, p. 3014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Ya. Kamentsev
    • 1
    Email author
  • N. M. Yakimova
    • 1
  • L. N. Moskvin
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Chemistry, St. Petersburg State UniversityPetrodvoretsRussia

Personalised recommendations