Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing

, Volume 54, Issue 9, pp 654–661 | Cite as

DIUS-1.15M Mobile Hardware–Software Structuroscopy System

  • V. N. KostinEmail author
  • O. N. Vasilenko
  • A. V. Byzov
Electromagnetic Methods


It is shown that by measuring the magnetic field in a specially shaped hole made in the magnetic circuit of a measuring transducer and the tangential component of the magnetic field in the transducer’s interpolar space near the surface of an object being magnetized, it is possible to locally determine the relative values of the magnetic properties of the test-object substance. The physical rationale is provided for a technique that makes it possible to determine the entirety of hysteresis characteristics and significantly expand the ranges of measurement of magnetic properties. The difference is established between the structural sensitivities of magnetic properties locally determined in terms of “flux–internal field” (the properties of matter) and “flux in the product–current in the windings” (the properties of “body”) coordinates. It is shown that it is possible and expedient to simultaneously measure and jointly analyze the magnetic characteristics of matter and “body”. Information is provided on the DIUS-1.15M mobile hardware–software system, intended for implementing single- and multiparameter techniques of monitoring the structure–phase and stress–strain states of ferromagnetic materials and objects based on the proposed measurement procedures.


magnetic properties of matter coercive force remanence coercive-return induction measuring transducer hardware–software system 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Shcherbinin, V.E. and Gorkunov, E.S., Magnitnye metody strukturnogo analiza i nerazrushayushchego kontrolya (Magnetic Methods of Structural Analysis and Nondestructive Testing), Yekaterinburg: Ural Branch, Russ. Acad. Sci., 1996.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Filinov, V.V, Arakelov, P.G, and Trubienko, O.V., Universal information-measuring system for controlling the physical and mechanical properties of articles made of ferromagnetic steels using their magnetic parameters, Kontrol Diagn., 2016, no. 5, pp. 48–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gobov, Yu.L., Zhakov, S.V., and Mikhailov, A.V., Measuring saturation magnetization in a local sample area, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2016, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 722–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zakharov, V.A., Molin, S.M., and Len’kov, S.V., Evaluating the structure of a ferromagnetic material based on magnetic-field strength between the poles of an attached two-pole magnetizing device, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2017, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 126–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kostin, V.N. and Smorodinskii, Ya.G., Multipurpose software-hardware systems for active electromagnetic testing as a trend, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2017, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 493–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gobov, Yu.L., Zhakov, S.V., and Mikhailov, A.V., Measuring coercive force in local domains of a sample, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2017, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 779–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reutov, Yu.Ya. and Pudov, V.I., Hardware for inspection of ferromagnetic low coercive-force articles, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2017, vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 856–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tikadzumi, S., Physics of Ferromagnetism. Magnetic Characteristics and Practical Applications, Moscow: Mir, 1987 [Russian translation].Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kostin, V.N., Osintsev, A.A., Stashkov, A.N., Nichipuruk, A.P., Kostin, K.V., and Sazhina, E.Yu., Portable instruments for multiparameter magnetic evaluation of material structures, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2008, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 280–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bida, G.V., Mikheev, M.N., and Kostin, V.N. Determination of the dimensions of attached electromagnets intended for the nondestructive inspection of depth and hardness of surface-hardened layers, The Soviet J. Nondestr. Test, 1984, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 495–501.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parallel Calculations at the Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences. Launching Programs from the ANSYS, URL package: http://www.parallel.uran.r./node/264/Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kostin, V.N., Nichipuruk, A.P., Nikolaeva, L.A., Sokolova, S.V., Smorodinskii, Ya.G., and Vasilenko, O.N., Magnetic testing of hardness of cast railcar steel 32X06? after quenching and high-temperature tempering, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2016, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 716–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kostin, V.N. and Vasilenko, O.N., Local measurement of the coercive-return induction in the presence of a gap in the transducer-object combined circuit, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2012, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 391–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kostin, V.N. and Vasilenko, O.N., On new possibilities for making local measurements of the coercive force of ferromagnetic objects, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2012, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 401–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. N. Kostin
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • O. N. Vasilenko
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. V. Byzov
    • 1
  1. 1.Mikheev Institute of Metal Physics, Ural BranchRussian Academy of SciencesYekaterinburgRussia
  2. 2.Ural Federal UniversityYekaterinburgRussia

Personalised recommendations