Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 309–324 | Cite as

Effect on the Performance of a Support Vector Machine Based Machine Vision System with Dry and Wet Ore Sample Images in Classification and Grade Prediction

  • Ashok Kumar Patel
  • Snehamoy ChatterjeeEmail author
  • Amit Kumar GoraiEmail author
Applied Problems


The aim of the present study is to analysing the effect of water absorption on iron ore samples in the performances of SVM-based machine vision system. Two types of SVM-based machine vision system (classification and regression) were designed and developed, and performances were compared with dry and wet ore sample images. The images of the ore samples were captured in both the conditions (wet and dry) to examine the proposed model performance. A total of 280 image features were extracted and optimised using sequential forward floating selection (SFFS) algorithm for model development. The iron ore samples were collected from an Indian iron ore mine (Guamine), and image capturing system was fabricated in the laboratory for executing the proposed study. The results indicated that a different set of optimised features obtained for dry and wet sample images in both the models (classification and regression). Furthermore, the performance of both the models with dry sample images was found to be relatively better than the wet sample images.


SVM classification and regression iron ore machine vision system dry and wet sample image 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    C. Duchesne, “Multivariate image analysis in mineral processing,” in Advanced Control and Supervision of Mineral Processing Plants, Ed. by D. Sbárbaro and R. del Villar, Advances in Industrial Control (Springer, London, 2010), pp. 85–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. B. Mall and N. da Vitoria Lobo, “Determining wet surfaces from dry,” in Proc. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (Cambridge, MA, USA, 1995) (IEEE Comput. Soc., 1995), pp. 963–968.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Teshima, H. Saito, M. Shimizu, and A. Taguchi, “Classification of wet/dry area based on the mahalanobis distance of feature from time space image analysis,” in Proc. 11th IAPR Conf. on Machine Vision Applications (MVA2009) (Yokohama, Japan, 2009), pp. 467–470.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Lekner and M. C. Dorf, “Why some things are darker when wet,” Appl. Opt. 27 (7), 1278–1280 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Ångström, “The albedo of various surfaces of ground,” Geograf. Ann. 7, 323–342 (1925).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. R. P. Petersen, C. Aldrich, and J. S. J. Van Deventer, “Analysis of ore particles based on textural pattern recognition,” Miner. Eng. 11 (10), 959–977 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Tessier, C. Duchesne, and G. Bartolacci, “A machine vision approach to on-line estimation of run-of-mine ore composition on conveyor belts,” Miner. Eng. 20 (12), 1129–1144 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Z. Abdullah, J. Mohamad-Saleh, A. S. Fathinul-Syahir, B. M. N. Mohd-Azemi, “Discrimination and classification of fresh-cut starfruits (Averrhoa carambola L.) using automated machine vision system,” J. Food Eng. 76 (4), 506–523 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. J. Davidson, J. Ryks, and T. Chu, “Fuzzy models to predict consumer ratings for biscuits based on digital image features,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 9 (1), 62–67 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. Coifman, D. Beymer, P. McLauchlan, and J. Malik, “A real-time computer vision system for vehicle tracking and traffic surveillance,” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 6 (4), 271–288 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    V. Karathanassi, C. Iossifidis, and D. Rokos, “Application of machine vision techniques in the quality control of pharmaceutical solutions,” Comput. Ind. 32 (2), 169–179 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. Shang and D. Barnes, “Fuzzy-rough feature selection aided support vector machines for Mars image classification,” Comput. Vision Image Understanding 117 (3), 202–213 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. Perez, A. Casali, G. Gonzalez, G. Vallebuona, and R.Vargas, “Lithological composition sensor based on digital image feature extraction, genetic selection of features and neural classification,” in Proc. 1999 Int. Conf. on Information Intelligence and Systems (Bethesda, MD, USA, 1999) (IEEE Comput. Soc., 1999), pp. 236–241.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Courbon, Y. Mezouar, N. Guénard, and P. Martinet, “Vision-based navigation of unmanned aerial vehicles,” Control Eng. Pract. 18 (7), 789–799 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. Al-Thyabat and N. J. Miles, “An improved estimation of size distribution from particle profile measurements,” Powder Technol. 166 (3), 152–160 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    N. Sadr-Kazemi and J. Cilliers, “An image processing algorithm for measurement of flotation froth bubble size and shape distributions,” Miner. Eng. 10 (10), 1075–1083 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. K. Patel and S. Chatterjee, “Computer vision-based limestone rock-type classification using probabilistic neural network,” Geosci. Front. 7 (1), 53–60 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Chatterjee and A. Bhattacherjee, “Genetic algorithms for feature selection of image analysis-based quality monitoring model: An application to an iron mine,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 24 (5), 786–795 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Z. Zhang, J. Yang, Y. Wang, D. Dou, and W. Xia, “Ash content prediction of coarse coal by image analysis and GA-SVM,” Powder Technol. 268, 429–435 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    C. A. Perez, P. A. Estévez, P. A. Vera, L. E. Castillo, C. M. Aravena, D. A. Schulz, and L. E. Medina, “Ore grade estimation by feature selection and voting using boundary detection in digital image analysis,” Int. J. Miner. Process. 101 (1–4), 28–36 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    C. A. Perez, J. A. Saravia, C. F. Navarro, D. A. Schulz, C. M. Aravena, and F. J. Galdames, “Rock lithological classification using multi-scale Gabor features from sub-images, and voting with rock contour information,” Int. J. Miner. Process. 144, 56–64 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. K. Patel, S. Chatterjee, and A. K. Gorai, “Development of machine vision-based ore classification model using support vector machine (SVM) algorithm,” Arabian J. Geosci. 10 (5), Article 107 (2017).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    S. Chatterjee, A. Bhattacherjee, B. Samanta, and S. K. Pal, “Image-based quality monitoring system of limestone ore grades,” Comput. Ind. 61 (5), 391–408 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. Casali, G. Gonzalez, G. Vallebuona, C. Perez, and R. Vargas, “Grindability soft-sensors based on lithological composition and on-line measurements,” Miner. Eng. 14 (7), 689–700 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    J. M. Oestreich, W. K. Tolley, and D. A. Rice, “The development of a color sensor system to measure mineral compositions,” Miner. Eng. 8 (1–2), 31–39 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    V. Singh and S. M. Rao, “Application of image processing and radial basis neural network techniques for ore sorting and ore classification,” Miner. Eng. 18 (15), 1412–1420 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    S. Chatterjee, “Vision-based rock-type classification of limestone using multi-class support vector machine,” Appl. Intell. 39 (1), 14–27 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    X. Meng, “Scalable simple random sampling and stratified sampling,” in Proc. 30th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning (ICML’13) (Atlanta, GA, USA, 2013), PMLR 28 (3), 531–539 (2013).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    S. L. Jackson, Research Methods and Statistics: A Critical Thinking Approach, 5th ed. (Cengage Learning, Boston, MA, 2015).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    D. D. Sarma, Geostatistics with Applications in Earth Sciences, 2nd ed. (Springer, Dordrecht, 2009).zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    R. C. Gonzalez and R. E. Woods, Digital Image Processing, 3rd ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2008).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Y. Zhao, D. Li, and Z. Li, “Performance enhancement and analysis of an adaptive median filter,” in Proc. 2007 Second Int. Conf. on Communications and Networking in China (ChinaCom’07) (Shanghai, China, 2007), IEEE, pp. 651–653.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    M. G. Forero-Vargas and L. J. Delgado-Rangel, “Fuzzy filters for noise removal,” in Fuzzy Filters for Image Processing, Ed. by M. Nachtegael, D. Van der Weken, E. E. Kerre, and D. Van De Ville, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2003), Vol. 122, pp. 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    P. S. J. Sree, P. Kumar, R. Siddavatam, and R. Verma, “Salt-and-pepper noise removal by adaptive medianbased lifting filter using second-generation wavelets,” Signal, Image Video Process. (SIViP) 7 (1), 111–118 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    A. Kumar, “Deblurring of motion blurred images using histogram of oriented gradients and geometric moments,” Signal Process. Image Commun. 55, 55–65 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    S. Tang, W. Gong, W. Li, and W. Wang, “Non-blind image deblurring method by local and nonlocal total variation models,” Signal Process. 94, 339–349 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    L. P. Yaroslavsky, “Fast transforms in image processing: Compression, restoration, and resampling,” Adv. Electr. Eng. 2014, Article ID 276241, 23 pages (2014).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    H. F. Harmuth, Transmission of Information by Orthogonal Functions (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1970).zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    N. Ahmed, T. Natarajan, and K. R. Rao, “Discrete cosine transform,” IEEE Trans. Comput. C-23 (1), 90–93 (1974).MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    J. G. Daugman, “Uncertainty relation for resolution in space, spatial frequency, and orientation optimized by two-dimensional visual cortical filters,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 2 (7), 1160–1169 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    J. G. Daugman, “Two-dimensional spectral analysis of cortical receptive field profiles,” Vision Res. 20 (10), 847–856 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    I. Daubechies, “Orthonormal bases of compactly supported wavelets,” Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 41 (7), 909–996 (1988).MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    I. Daubechies, “Where do wavelets come from? A personal point of view,” Proc. IEEE 84 (4), 510–513 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    M. Kudo and J. Sklansky, “Comparison of algorithms that select features for pattern classifiers,” Pattern Recogn. 33 (1), 25–41 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    J. Schenk, M. Kaiser, and G. Rigoll, “Selecting features in on-line handwritten whiteboard note recognition: SFS or SFFS?”, in Proc. 10th Int. Conf. on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR 2009) (Barcelona, Spain, 2009) (IEEE Comput. Soc., 2009), p. 1251–1254.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    E. Dougherty, J. Hua, and C. Sima, “Performance of Feature Selection Methods,” Curr. Genomics 10 (6), 365–374 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    V. N. Vapnik, The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory (Springer, New York, 1995).zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    V. N. Vapnik, “An overview of statistical learning theory,” IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 10 (5), 988–999 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    S. Raghavendra N. and P. C. Deka, “Support vector machine applications in the field of hydrology: A review,” Appl. Soft Comput. 19, 372–386 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    G. Mountrakis, J. Im, and C. Ogole, “Support vector machines in remote sensing: A review,” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 66 (3), 247–259 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    S. Rajasekaran, S. Gayathri, and T. L. Lee, “Support vector regression methodology for storm surge predictions,” Ocean Eng. 35 (16), 1578–1587 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    G. Czibula, I. G. Czibula, and R. D. Gaceanu, “A support vector machine model for intelligent selection of data representations,” Appl. Soft Comput. 18, 70–81 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    R. M. Barbosa, E. S. de Paula, A. C. Paulelli, A. F. Moore, J. M. O. Souza, B. L. Batista, A. D. Campiglia, and F. Barbosa, “Recognition of organic rice samples based on trace elements and support vector machines,” J. Food Compos. Anal. 45, 95–100 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    L. Khedher, J. Ramírez, J. M. Górriz, A. Brahim, and F. Segovia, “Early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease based on partial least squares, principal component analysis and support vector machine using segmented MRI images,” Neurocomput. 151, Part 1, 139–150 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Y. Liu, H. Wang, H. Zhang, and K. Liber, “A comprehensive support vector machine-based classification model for soil quality assessment,” Soil Tillage Res. 155, 19–26 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Y. Tian, M. Fu, and F. Wu, “Steel plates fault diagnosis on the basis of support vector machines,” Neurocomput. 151, Part 1, 296–303 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    R. Rifkin, S. Mukherjee, P. Tamayo, et al. “An analytical method for multiclass molecular cancer classification,” SIAM Rev. 45 (4), 706–723 (2003).MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    X. Xi, A.-N. Poo, and S. Chou, “Support vector regression model predictive control on a HVAC plant,” Control Eng. Pract. 15 (8), 897–908 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    O. Ivanciuc, “Applications of support vector machines in chemistry,” in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, Ed. by K. B. Lipkowitz and T. R. Cundari, Vol. 23 (Wiley, New York, 2007), pp. 291–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    R. Ranawana and V. Palade, “Multi-Classifier Systems: Review and a roadmap for developers,” Int. J. Hybrid Intell. Syst. 3 (1), 35–61 (2006).zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    M. Sokolova and G. Lapalme, “A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks,” Inf. Process. Manage. 45 (4), 427–437 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringK L Education FoundationGunturIndia
  2. 2.Department of Geological and Mining Engineering and SciencesMichigan Technological UniversityHoughtonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Mining EngineeringNational Institute of TechnologyRourkelaIndia

Personalised recommendations