Advertisement

Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 588–594 | Cite as

The Grid Methods of the Recognition of the Region of Efficiency of Microwave Devices

  • G. M. Antonova
Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

Some results for design and optimization of complex microwave devices are considered in this article. The problems are investigated from the standpoint of recognition of region of efficiency in which necessary values of given output characteristics are appeared. The application for optimization of meshes that are uniform in the multidimensional space of parameters is discussed. The solution of the approximate optimization problem using a specially created mathematical model of the device and software packages that implement time-consuming computational procedures is debated.

Keywords

modeling multiple-criterion optimization region of efficiency recognition parameter space investigation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    G. M. Antonova, “LPτ–search with averaging as a tool for optimizing parameters of signal processing devices,” Pattern Recogn. Image Anal. 13 (4), 611–616 (2003).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. M. Antonova and A. Yu. Baikov, “LPτ–search with averaging methodology for optimizing powerful and super power klystrons,” in Proc. Second IASTED International Multi–Conference “Signal and Image Processing” (ACIT–SIP) (Novosibirsk, Russia, 2005), pp. 126–130.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. M. Antonova and A. Yu. Baikov, “The way to use the LPτ–search with averaging for parameters definition in powerful vacuums resonator UHF–devices of O–type synthesis,” in Proc. 5th Int. Conf. System Identification and Control Problems (SICPRO’06) (Moscow, 2006), pp. 823–837 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. M. Antonova, “New algorithm for klystrons amplitude frequency characteristics optimizing,” in Proc. IASTED Int. Conf. on Automation, Control, and Information Technology—Control, Diagnostics, and Automation (ACIT–CDA 2010) (Novosibirsk, Russia, 2010), pp. 217–222.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. M. Antonova, The mesh methods of uniform probe for investigation and optimization of the dynamical stochastic systems (Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2007) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    I. M Sobol’ and R.B. Statnikov, Selection of Optimal Parameters in Problems with Several Criteria (Moscow, Nauka, 1981) [in Russian].zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Niederreiter, “Quasi–Monte–Karlo methods and pseudo random numbers,” Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 84 (6), 957–1041 (1978).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Niederreiter and K. McCurley, “Optimization of functions by quasi–random search methods,” Computing 22 (2), 119–123 (1979).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. M. Chernov, “Canonical number systems and twodimensional uniform distribution,” in Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis: New information technologies (PRIA–7–2004) (St. Petersburg, Oct. 18–23, 2004), Vol. 1, pp. 185–188.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. M. Antonova, “LPτ–search with averaging for stochastic system study,” in Proc. IASTED Int. Conf. on Automation, Control, and Information Technology (ACIT’2002) (Novosibirsk, Russia, 2002), pp. 245–250.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. M. Antonova, “Optimization–simulation with continuous criteria using,” in Proc. 18th IFAC World Congress (IFAC’11), International Federation of Automatic Control, Milano, Italy, August 28–September 2, 2011, IFAC Proc. Vols., 44 (1), 5543–5548 (2011).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Yu. Baikov, Methods of achieving of the limit values of efficiency factor in powerful vacuum resonant microwave devices of O–type. Thesis for the competition of a scientific degree of Doctor of Sciences in Physics and Mathematics (Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow, 2017) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Yu. Baikov, C. Marrelli, and I. Syratchev “Toward high–power klystrons with RF power conversion efficiency on the order of 90%,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 62 (10), 3406–3412 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Yu. Baikov and O. A. Baikova, “Global scaling principle for simulation of powerful klystrons with high efficiency,” in Proc. 2016 International Conference on Actual Problems of Electron Devices Engineering (APEDE) (SSTU, Saratov, Russia, 2016), Vol. 1, pp. 9–11. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7878840/Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Yu. Baikov and O. A. Grushina, Mathematicl Model of Electron Beam Transformation in a Narrow Tube and its Application to the Design of High–Power Klystrons (Moscow University of Finances and Law (MFUA), Moscow, 2013) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    I. M. Sobol’ and Y. L. Levitan, About Pseudorandom Numbers Generator for Personal Computers (Institute of Applied Mathematics RAS, Moscow, 1990) [in Russian].zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    I. M. Sobol’, “Range—a quantitative measure of irregularity of distribution,” Mat. Model. 14 (6), 119–127 (2002) [in Russian].MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    MAGIC Tool Suite /Orbital ATK, Inc., Newington, VA. Website URL: http://www.orbitalatk.com/magic, free.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations