Laser Physics

, Volume 16, Issue 10, pp 1439–1443 | Cite as

Generation of polarization-entangled photon pairs by a single crystal interferometric source pumped by femtosecond laser pulses

  • M. Barbieri
  • C. Cinelli
  • F. De Martini
  • P. Mataloni


Photon pairs highly entangled in polarization have been generated under femtosecond laser pulse excitation by a type-I crystal source operating in a single-arm interferometric scheme. The relevant effects of temporal walkoff existing in these conditions between the ordinary and extraordinary photons were experimentally investigated. By introducing a suitable temporal compensation between the two orthogonal polarization components, highly entangled pulsed states were obtained.

PACS numbers

03.67.-a 03.67.Mn 03.67.Pp 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A. Ekert and R. Jozsa, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 733 (1996).MathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Boschi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1121 (1998); D. Bouwmeester et al., Nature (London) 390, 575 (1997).zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Ekert, Nature (London) 358, 14 (1992); N. Gisin, G. Ribordy, W. Tittel, and H. Zbinden, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 145 (2002); A. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661 (1991).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. G. Kwiat, K. Mattle, H. Weinfurter, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4337 (1995).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. G. Kwait, E. Waks, A. G. White, et al., Phys. Rev. A 6, R773 (1999).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Giorgi, G. Di Nepi, P. Mataloni and F. De Martini, Laser Phys. 13, 350 (2003); C. Cinelli, G. Di Nepi, F. De Martini, et al., Phys. Rev. A 70, 022321 (2004).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Barbieri, F. De Martini, G. Di Nepi, and P. Mataloni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 177901 (2004).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. A. Peters, J. B. Altepeter, D. Branning, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 133601 (2004).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. Cinelli, M. Barbieri, R. Perris, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 240405 (2005).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. T. Barreiro, N. K. Langford, N. A. Peters, and P. G. Kwait, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 260501 (2005).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. Bouwmeester, J.-W. Pan, M. Daniell, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1345 (1999).zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Y. Nambu, K. Usami, Y. Tsuda, et al., Phys. Rev. A 66, 033816 (2002); Y.-H Kim, S. P. Kulik, and Y. Shih, Phys. Rev. A 62, 011802 (2000).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. Di Giuseppe, L. Haiberger, F. De Martini, and A. V. Sergienko, Phys. Rev. A 56, R21 (1997).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 15.
    V. G. Dmitriev, G. G. Gurzadyan, and D. N. Nikogosyan, Handbook of Nonlinear Optical Crystals. Springer Series in Optical Sciences (Springer, New York, 1999).Google Scholar
  15. 16.
    M. Barbieri, F. De Martini, G. Di Nepi, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 227901 (2003).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 17.
    R. F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A 40, 4277 (1989).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© MAIK “Nauka/Interperiodica” 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Barbieri
    • 1
  • C. Cinelli
    • 1
  • F. De Martini
    • 1
  • P. Mataloni
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di FisicaUniversità di Roma La Sapienza and Consorzio Interuniversitario per le Scienze Fisiche della MateriaRomaItaly

Personalised recommendations