Laser Physics

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 833–837 | Cite as

In vivo Raman spectroscopic analysis of the influence of UV radiation on carotenoid antioxidant substance degradation of the human skin

  • M. E. Darvin
  • I. Gersonde
  • H. Albrecht
  • W. Sterry
  • J. Lademann
Laser Methods in Biology and Medicine

Abstract

It is well known from the literature that carotenoid antioxidant substances decrease after the irradiation of the skin with UV light. Available literature has shown no information about the response time and total dynamics of degradation of carotenoid antioxidants after UV irradiation. The measurements were made with the HPLC method, which is time-consuming and does not give relevant information about the dynamics of degradation of carotenoids in the skin after UV irradiation. With the introduction of new noninvasive spectroscopic methods, it became possible to measure in vivo the behavior of carotenoid antioxidant substances, such as betacarotene and lycopene in the skin after UV light exposure. In the present study, the resonance Raman spectroscopy method was used as a fast and noninvasive optical method to measure the dynamics of degradation of beta-carotene and lycopene in living human skin after UV exposure. It was found that the beta-carotene and lycopene concentration in the skin does not decrease immediately after UV irradiation. There is a time delay, which varies from 30 up to 90 min for beta-carotene and from 0 up to 30 min for lycopene. A strong nonlinear correlation between the individual antioxidant level of volunteers and the magnitude of destruction of antioxidants in the skin was found.

PACS numbers

87.64.Je 87.64.Cc 87.50.Hj 82.50.Nd 82.50.Hp 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    H. K. Biesalski, C. Hemmes, W. Hopfenmuller, et al., Free Radic. Res. 24, 215 (1996).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. E. Darvin, I. Gerzonde, S. Ey, et al., Laser Phys. 14, 231 (2003).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. R. Young, J. M. Sheehan, C. A. Chadwick, and C. S. Potten, J. Invest. Dermatol. 115(1), 37 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. S. Phillips, J. Bhawan, M. Yaar, et al., J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 43(4), 610 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    O. Dumay, A. Karam, L. Vian, et al., Br. J. Dermatol. 144(6), 1161 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. R. Taylor and A. J. Sober, Annu. Rev. Med. 47, 181 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Krutmann, Schweiz Rundsch. Med. Prax. 22,(90) (8), 297 (2001).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. S. Moon and C. H. Oh, Dermatology, 202(4), 289 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Krutmann, Hautarzt 52(1), 62 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. R. Hata, T. A. Scholz, I. V. Ermakov, et al., J. Invest. Dermatol. 115, 441 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. Stahl, U. Heinrich, S. Wiseman, et al., J. Nutr. 131, 1449 (2001).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Di Mascio, S. Kaiser, and H. Sies, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 274, 532 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. D. Ribaya-Mercado, M. Garmyn, B. A. Gilchrest, and R. M. Russell, J. Nutr. 125, 1854 (1995).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. Talwar, K. K. Ha Tom, J. Cooney, et al., Clin. Chim. Acta 270, 85 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. E. Darvin, I. Gersonde, M. Meinke, et al., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 38, 2696 (2005).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© MAIK “Nauka/Interperiodica” 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. E. Darvin
    • 1
  • I. Gersonde
    • 2
  • H. Albrecht
    • 2
  • W. Sterry
    • 1
  • J. Lademann
    • 1
  1. 1.Center of Experimental and Applied Cutaneous Physiology (CCP)Dermatology, Charité, BerlinGermany
  2. 2.Laser and Medical Technology GmbHBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations