Advertisement

Physical Mesomechanics

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 32–41 | Cite as

A Precis of Fishnet Statistics for Tail Probability of Failure of Materials with Alternating Series and Parallel Links

  • Z. P. BažantEmail author
Article
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

During the last dozen years it has been established that the Weibull statistical theory of structural failure and strength scaling does not apply to quasibrittle materials. These are heterogeneous materials with brittle constituents and a representative volume element that is not negligible compared to the structure dimensions. A new theory of quasibrittle strength statistics in which the strength distribution is a structure size dependent graft of Gaussian and Weibull distributions has been developed. The present article gives a precis of several recent studies, conducted chiefly at the writer’s home institution, in which the quasibrittle statistics has been refined to capture the statistical effect of alternating series and parallel links, which is exemplified by the material architecture of staggered platelets seen on the submicrometer scale in nacre. This architecture, which resembles a fishnet pulled diagonally, intervenes in many quasibrittle materials. The fishnet architecture is found to be advantageous for increasing the material strength at the tail of failure probability 10—6, which represents the maximum tolerable risk for engineering structures and should be adopted as the basis of tail-risk design. Scaling analysis, asymptotic considerations, and cohesive fracture process zone, which were the hallmark of Barenblatt’s contributions, pervade the new theory, briefly called the “fishnet statistics”.

Keywords

probabilistic mechanics material strength fracture mechanics strength scaling size effect nacreous materials biomimetic materials micromechanics of failure nanoscale fracture scale bridging tolerable risk 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Duckett, K., Risk Analysis and the Acceptable Probability of Failure, Struct. Eng., 2005, vol. 83(15), pp. 25–26.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Melchers, R.E., Structural Reliability, Analysis and Prediction, New York: Wiley, 1987.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    NKB (Nordic Committee for Building Structures). Recommendation for Loading and Safety Regulations for Structural Design, NKB Report, 1978, no. 36.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Weibull, W., The Phenomenon of Rupture in Solids, Proc. Roy. Swedish Inst. Eng. Res. Stockhohn, 1939, vol. 153, pp. 1–55.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fisher, R.A. and Tippett, L.H.C., Limiting Forms of the Frequency Distribution of the Largest or Smallest Member of a Sample, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Cambridge University Press, 1928, vol. 24, no. 02, pp. 180–190.ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Daniels, H.E., The Statistical Theory of the Strength of Bundles and Threads, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 1945, vol. 183, pp. 405–435.ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harlow, D.G. and Phoenix, S.L., The Chain–of–Bundles Probability Model for the Strength of Fibrous Materials I: Analysis and conjectures, J. Compos. Mater., 1978, vol. 12(2), pp. 195–214.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harlow, D.G. and Phoenix, S.L., The Chain–of–Bundles Probability Model for the Strength of Fibrous Materials II: A Numerical Study of Convergence, J. Compos. Mater., 1978, vol. 12(3), pp. 314–334.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Harlow, D.G. and Phoenix, S.L, Bounds on the Probability of Failure of Composite Materials, Int. J. Fracture, 1979, vol. 15(4), pp. 312–336.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bazant, Z.P. and Pang, S.–D., Mechanics Based Statistics of Failure Risk of Quasibrittle Structures and Size Effect on Safety Factors, Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. USA, 2006, vol. 103(25), pp. 9434–9439.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bazant, Z.P. and Pang, S.–D., Activation Energy Based Extreme Value Statistics and Size Effect in Brittle and Quasibrittle Fracture, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 2007, vol. 55, pp. 91–134.ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bazant, Z.P. and Le, J.–L., Probabilistic Mechanics of Quasibrittle Structures: Strength, Lifetime, and Size Effect, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Luo, Wen and Bazant, Z.P., Fishnet Model for Failure Probability Tail of Nacre–Like Imbricated Lamellar Materials, Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci., 2017, vol. 114(49), pp. 12900–12905.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Luo, Wen and Bazant, Z.P., Fishnet Statistics for Probabilistic Strength and Scaling of Nacreous Imbricated Lamellar Materials, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 2017, vol. 109, pp. 264–287 (update of Arxiv1706.01591, June 4, 2017).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Freudenthal, A.M., Statistical Approach to Brittle Fracture, in Fracture: An Advanced Treatise, vol. 2, Liebowitz, H., Ed., New York: Academic Press, 1968, pp. 591–619.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bazant, Z.P., Le, J.–L., and Bazant, M.Z., Scaling of Strength and Lifetime Probability Distributions of Quasibrittle Structures Based on Atomistic Fracture Mechanics, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 2009, vol. 106–28, pp. 11484–11489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Barenblatt, G.I., The Formation of Equilibrium Cracks during Brittle Fracture, General Ideas and Hypothesis, Axially Symmetric Cracks, Prikl. Mat. Mech” 1959, vol. 23(3), pp. 434–444.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bazant, Z.P. and Planas, J., Fracture and Size Effect in Concrete and Other Quasibrittle Materials, CRC Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhurkov, S.N., Kinetic Concept of the Strength of Solids, Int. J. Fract. Mech., 1965, vol. 1(4), pp. 311–323.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhurkov, S.N. and Korsukov, V.E., Atomic Mechanism of Fracture of Solid Polymer, J. Polym. Sci., 1974, vol. 12(2), pp. 385–398.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kramers, H.A., Brownian Motion in a Field of Force and the Diffusion Model of Chemical Reaction, Physica, 1941, vol. 7, pp. 284–304.ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bazant, Z.P., Scaling Theory of Quaisbrittle Structural Failure, Proc. Nat'l. Acad. Sci. USA, 2004, vol. 101(37), pp. 13397–13399.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bazant, Z.P., Size Effect in Blunt Fracture: Concrete, Rock, Metal, J. Engrg. Mech. ASCE, 1984, vol. 110(4), pp. 518–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bazant, Z.P. and Kazemi, M.T., Determination of Fracture Energy, Process Zone Length and Brittleness Number from Size Effect, with Application to Rock and Concrete, Int. J. Fracture, 1990, vol. 44, pp. 111–131.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bazant, Z.P., Scaling of Quasibrittle Fracture: Asymptotic Analysis, Int. J. Fracture, 1997, vol. 83(1), pp. 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bazant, Z.P., Scaling of Structural Strength, London: Elsevier, 2005.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bazant, Z.P. and Le, J.–L., Nano–Mechanics Based Modeling of Lifetime Distribution of Quasibrittle Structures, J. Engrg Failure Analysis, 2009, vol. 16, pp. 2521–2529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Le, J.–L., Bazant, Z.P., and Bazant, M.Z., Unified Nano–Mechanics Based Probabilistic Theory of Quasibrittle and Brittle Structures: I. Strength, Static Crack Growth, Lifetime and Scaling, J. Mech. Phys Solids, 2011, vol. 59(7), pp. 1291–1321.ADSzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Le, J.–L. and Bazant, Z.P., Unified Nano–Mechanics Based Probabilistic Theory of Quasibrittle and Brittle Structures: II. Fatigue Crack Growth, Lifetime and Scaling, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 2011, vol. 59, pp. 1322–1337.ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Askarinejad, S. and Rahbar, N., Toughening Mechanisms in Bioinspired Multilayered Materials, J. Roy. Soc. Interface, 2015, vol. 102(12), p. 20140855.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chen, L., Ballarini, R., Kahn, H., and Heuer, A.H., A Bioinspired Micro–Composite Structure, J. Mater. Res., 2007, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 124–131.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dutta, A., Tekalur, S.A., and Miklavcic, M., Optimal Overlap Length in Staggered Architecture Composites under Dynamic Loading Conditions, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 2013, vol. 61(1), pp. 145–160.ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dutta, A. and Tekalur, S.A., Crack Tortuousity in the Nacreous Layer—Topological Dependence and Biomimetic Design Guideline, Int. J. Solids Struct., 2014, vol. 51(2), p. 325335.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gao, H., Ji, B., Jäger, I.L., Arzt, E., and Fratzl, P., Materials Become Insensitive to Flaws at Nanoscale: Lessons from Nature, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 2003, vol. 100(10), pp. 5597–5600.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shao, Y., Zhao, H.P., Feng, X.Q., and Gao, H., Discontinuous Crack–Bridging Model for Fracture Toughness Analysis of Nacre, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 2012, vol. 60(8), pp. 1400–1419.ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wang, R.Z., Suo, Z., Evans, A.G., Yao, N., and Aksay, I.A., Deformation Mechanisms in Nacre, J. Mater. Res., 2001, vol. 16(09), pp. 2485–2493.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wei, X., Filleter, T., and Espinosa, H.D., Statistical Shear Lag Model: Unraveling the Size Effect in Hierarchical Composites, Acta Biomater., 2015, vol. 18, pp. 206–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Luo, Wen and Bazant, Z.P., Fishnet Model with Order Statistics for Tail Probability of Failure of Nacreous Biomimetic Materials with Softening Interlaminar Links, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 2018, vol. 121, pp. 281–295.ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Barenblatt, G.I., Scaling, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Barenblatt, G.I., Similarity, Self–Similarity and Intermediate Asymptotics, Moscow: Gidrometeoizdat, 1978; Consultants Bureau, New York, 1979.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Le, J.–L., Elias, J., and Bazant, Z.P., Computation of Probability Distribution of Strength of Quasibrittle Structures Failing at Macrocrack Initiation, ASCE J. Engrg. Mech., 2012, vol. 138(7), pp. 888–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Le, J.–L., Size Effect on Reliability Indices and Safety Factors of Quasibrittle Structures, Struct. Saf., 2015, vol. 52, pp. 20–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Le, J.–L., Ballarini, R., and Zhu, Z., Modeling of Probabilistic Failure of Polycrystalline Silicon MEMS Structures, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2015, vol. 98–6, pp. 1685–1697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations