Advertisement

Doklady Earth Sciences

, Volume 483, Issue 2, pp 1575–1578 | Cite as

Local Occurrence of the Relationship between Variations in the Earth’s Rotation Rate and the Dynamics of Seismicity: Case Study of Sakhalin

  • B. W. Levin
  • E. V. Sasorova
  • A. S. ZakupinEmail author
  • P. A. Kamenev
GEOPHYSICS
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

On the basis of three methods, the current seismic situation in the zone of the Central Sakhalin Fault is assessed and the scenarios of its development are predicted. It is shown that beginning from early 2017 seismic activity considerably increased in comparison with previous years. It is determined that there is a very high probability of occurrence of an earthquake with possible magnitude Мw = 5–6 in the area studied in the period until August–November 2018 (the former date is by the LURR method; the latter, by the SDP method). This forecast continues the series of strong earthquakes in Sakhalin—Onor (August 14, 2016, Мw = 5.8) and Shebunino (April 23, 2017, Мw = 5.3)—which occurred with the onset of the period of deceleration of the Earth’s rotation rate.

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was carried out within the framework of the Federal Targeted Program entitled “Research and Development in the Top Priority Fields of Science and Technology in Russia for 2014–2020” and funded by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (the unique ID of the project is RFMEF160714Х0105).

The authors thank A.I. Malyshev for the opportunity to use his original SeisDynamicsView software.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    B. V. Levin and E. V. Sasorova, Dokl. Earth Sci. 464 (1), 987–991 (2015). doi 10.1134/S1028334X15090196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Bendick and R. Bilham, Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 8320–8327 (2017). doi 10.1002/2017GL074934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ma Li’Hua, Han Yan’Ben, and Yin Zhi’Qiang, 4 (4), 406–411 (2007).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    X. C. Yin, Y. C. Wang, K. Y. Peng, Y. L. Bai, H. T. Wang, and X. F. Yin, Pure Appl. Geophys. 157 (11–12), 2365–2383 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. I. Malyshev, Vulkanol. Seismol., No. 4, 61–72 (1991).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. S. Zakupin and O. A. Zherdeva, Vestn. Dal’nevost. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, No. 1, 18–25 (2017).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    I. N. Tikhonov and M. V. Rodkin, in Earthquake Research and Analysis–Statistical Studies, Observations and Planning, Ed. by S. D’Amico (InTech, Rijeka, 2012), pp. 43–78.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. S. Zakupin and P. A. Kamenev, Geosist. Perekhodnykh Zon 1 (3), 40–49 (2017).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. W. Levin
    • 1
    • 2
  • E. V. Sasorova
    • 2
  • A. S. Zakupin
    • 1
    Email author
  • P. A. Kamenev
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Marine Geology and Geophysics, Far East Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences Yuzhno-SakhalinskRussia
  2. 2.Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations