Doklady Earth Sciences

, Volume 471, Issue 2, pp 1288–1291 | Cite as

Physical characteristics of the Gulf Stream as an indicator of the quality of large-scale circulation modeling

Oceanology

Abstract

The general idea of this work is to show that the efficiency of modeling boundary currents (compared to the results of observations) can serve as an indicator of correctness for the modeling of the entire large-scale ocean circulation. The results of calculation of the mean surface currents in the Gulf Stream area based on direct measurements from drifters are presented together with the results of numerical modeling of variability of the Gulf Stream transport at 33°N over the period 2005–2014 based on data from Argo profiling buoys.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    O. P. Nikitin, Meteospektr. 2, 78–81 (2011).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    O. P. Nikitin, Russ. J. Earth Sci. 12 (5), 7 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. V. Lebedev, Oceanology 56 (2), 172–181 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Schott, Ann. Hydrogr. Marit. Meteorol. 71 (7), 281–282 (1943).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oceanology. Physics of the Ocean, Vol. 1: Hydrophysics of the Ocean, Ed. by V. M. Kamenkovich and A. S. Monin (Nauka, Moscow, 1978) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. S. Sarkisyan, Izv., Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 40 (5), 556–568 (2004).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. S. Sarkisyan and V. F. Ivanov, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Fiz. Atmos. Okeana 7 (2), 173–188 (1971).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kirk Bryan, Izv., Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 52 (4), 341–347 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. S. Sarkisyan, Izv., Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 52 (4), 335–340 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. S. Sarkisyan, K. V. Ushakov, V. S. Arkhipkin, and A. R. Gorbushkin, Izv., Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 52 (5), 590–600 (2016) (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. H. Rio, S. Guinehut, and G. Larnicol, J. Geophys. Res. 116, C07018 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. Maximenko and O. Melnichenko, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 26 (9), 1910–1919 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    N. G. Iakovlev, E. M. Volodin, and A. S. Gritsun, Izv., Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 52 (4), 376–385 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    N. A. Maximenko, R. Lumpkin, and L. Centurioni, in Int. Geophys., Vol. 103: Ocean Circulation and Climate. A 21st Century Perspective, Ed. by G. Siedler, S. M. Griffies, J. Gould, and J. A. Church (Academic Press, 2013), pp. 283–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. S. Sarkisyan
    • 1
    • 2
  • O. P. Nikitin
    • 3
  • K. V. Lebedev
    • 4
  1. 1.Hydrometeorological Centre of RussiaMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Numerical MathematicsRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Zubov State Institute of OceanographyRoshydromet, MoscowRussia
  4. 4.Shirshov Institute of OceanologyRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations