Doklady Earth Sciences

, Volume 441, Issue 2, pp 1678–1682 | Cite as

Impact of wildfire in Russia between 1998–2010 on ecosystems and the global carbon budget

  • A. Z. Shvidenko
  • D. G. Shchepashchenko
  • E. A. Vaganov
  • A. I. Sukhinin
  • Sh. Sh. Maksyutov
  • I. McCallum
  • I. P. Lakyda


Verified estimates of wildfire area and related carbon emissions in territories of Russia are reported for the period of 1998–2010. It is shown that the average burnt area is estimated to be at 8.23 million hectares per year (uncertainty ±9.0%, confidence interval 0.9), and carbon emissions—121 Tg C yr−1 (±23%), with a significant interannual variability of these indicators. A quantitative characteristic of fire emissions by species is reported. Forests are a source of three quarters of all carbon emissions caused by wildfires. A significant acceleration of fire regimes is expected during the 21st century as a result of climate change in the country.


Carbon Emission DOKLADY Earth Science Burnt Area Fire Regime Palmer Drought Severity Index 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    L. V. Buryak, A. I. Sukhinin, and S. A. Moskal’chenko, Lesovedenie, No. 5, 17–23 (2009) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. V. Vivchar, K. B. Moiseenko, and N. V. Pankratova, Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics 46(3), 307–320 (2010) [in Russian].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. D. Evdokimenko, IVUZ Lesnoy Zhurnal, No. 4, 12–18 (2009) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roshydromet RF, Report on Climate Particularities in Russian Federation in 2010 (Federal Service for Hydrometeorology and Environmental Monitoring, Moscow, 2011) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    RosStat RF, “Regions of Russia,” in Socio-Economic Indicators in 2010. Statistical Handbook (Federal State Statistics Service, Moscow, 2010) [in Russin].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. V. Rubtsov, A. I. Sukhinin, and E. A. Vaganov, Journal of Siberian Federal University Biology, No. 1, 30–39 (2010) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. O. Andreae and P. Merlet, Global Biogeochemical Cycles, No. 15, 955–966 (2001).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. F. Efremov and A. Z. Shvidenko, International Forest Fire News, No. 32, 43–49 (2004).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Flannigan, B. Stocks, M. Turetsky, et al., Global Change Biology, No. 15, 549–560 (2009).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Lapenis, A. Shvidenko, D. Shepaschenko, et al., Global Change Biology, No. 11, 2090–2102 (2005).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. Schepaschenko, I. McCallum, A. Shvidenko, et al., Journal of Land Use Science. Published online 22 December 2010).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. Seiler and P. J. Crutzen, Climatic Change, No. 2, 207–247 (1980).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Shvidenko, D. Schepaschenko, I. McCallum, et al., Climatic Change 103, 137–157 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. J. Soja, W. R. Cofer, H. H. Shugart, et al., Journal of Geophysical Research D: Atmospheres 109, D14S06 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. R. Van Der Werf, J. T. Randerson, L. Giglio, et al., Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 10, 11707–11735 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Z. Shvidenko
    • 1
    • 4
  • D. G. Shchepashchenko
    • 1
    • 2
  • E. A. Vaganov
    • 3
    • 4
  • A. I. Sukhinin
    • 4
  • Sh. Sh. Maksyutov
    • 5
  • I. McCallum
    • 1
  • I. P. Lakyda
    • 1
  1. 1.International Institute for Applied Systems AnalysisLaxenburgAustria
  2. 2.Moscow State Forest UniversityMoscow oblastRussia
  3. 3.Siberian Federal UniversityKrasnoyarskRussia
  4. 4.Sukachev Institute of Forest, Siberian DivisionRussian Academy of SciencesAkademogorodok, KrasnoyarskRussia
  5. 5.National Institute for Environmental StudiesTsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations