Advertisement

Russian Journal of Genetics

, Volume 55, Issue 3, pp 337–348 | Cite as

Genetic Structure of Urban and Suburban Populations of Common Hamster (Cricetus cricetus) in Ciscaucasia

  • N. Yu. FeoktistovaEmail author
  • I. G. Meschersky
  • P. L. Bogomolov
  • S. I. Meschersky
  • N. S. Poplavskaya
  • M. M. Chunkov
  • V. V. Yufereva
  • V. A. Tel’pov
  • A. V. Surov
ANIMAL GENETICS
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

On the basis of the allelic composition of ten microsatellite loci and mtDNA sequences, we studied the genetic structure of the common hamster populations that inhabit cities and suburban settlements in Ciscaucasia. It was shown that, in urbanized territories, the hamster population is divided into separated groups, the genetic differences between which are high and not related to the distance between them. On the outskirts of cities adjacent to undeveloped or green areas and further in rural areas, the degree of isolation of neighboring hamster settlements decreases, and the level of genetic differences between them begins to correspond to the distance separating the settlements. In the course of work, this species was first registered within the territory of the easternmost part of Ciscaucasia, in the Republic of Dagestan.

Keywords:

common hamster Cricetus cricetus Ciscaucasia urban populations microsatellites mtDNA 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the grant of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research 17-04-01061 and the Program of the Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences 0109-2018-0067 Biodiversity of Natural Systems and Biological Resources of Russia.

COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS

Conflict of interests. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement on the welfare of animals. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Luniak, M., Synurbization—adaptation of animal wildlife to urban development, Proceedings of the 4th International Urban Wildlife Symposium, Shaw, W.W., Harris, K.L., and van Druff, L., Eds., Tucson: Univ. Arizona, 2004, pp. 50—55.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Surov, A.V., Poplavskaya, N.C., Bogomolov, P.L., et al., Synurbization of the common hamster (Cricetus cricetus), Russ. J. Biol. Invasions, 2016, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 69—76.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S2075111716010094. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Karaseva, E.V., Telitsina, A.Yu., and Samoilov, B.L., Mlekopitayushchie Moskvy v proshlom i nastoyashchem (Mammals of Moscow in the Past and Present), Moscow: Nauka, 1999.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Čanády, A., New site of the European hamster (Cricetus cricetus) in the urban environment of Košice city (Slovakia), Zool. Ecol., 2013, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 61—65.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21658005.2013.769772 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Feoktistova, N.Yu., Surov, A.V., Tovpinetz, N.N., et al., The common hamster as a synurbist: a history of settlement in European cities, Zool. Pol., 2013, vol. 12/58, nos. 3—4, pp. 116—129.  https://doi.org/10.2478/zoop-2013-0009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Surov, A.V., Feoktistova, N.Yu., and Bogomolov, P.L., Colonization of Astana city by the (Cricetus cricetus L., 1758)—latest example of sinurbization, 24th Annual Meeting of the International Hamster Workgroup, Uglich, 2017, pp. 82—84.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Feoktistova, N.Yu., Meschersky, I.G., Surov, A.V., et al., Genetic structure of urban population of the common hamster (Cricetus cricetus), Russ. J. Genet., 2016, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 194—203.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795416020046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ognev, S.I., Gryzuny Severnogo Kavkaza (Rodents of the Northern Caucasus), Rostov-on-Don: Gos. Izd., 1924.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Neumann, K. and Jansman, H., Polymorphic microsatellites for the analysis of endangered common hamster populations (Cricetus cricetus L.), Conservat. Genet., 2004, vol. 5, pp. 127—130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bandelt, H.-J., Forster, P., and Röhl, A., Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies, Mol. Biol. Evol., 1999, vol. 16, pp. 37—48. http://www.fluxus-engineering.com.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pritchard, J.K., Stephens, M., and Donnelly, P.J., Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data, Genetics, 2000, vol. 155, pp. 945—959.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Earl, D.A. and von Holdt, B.M., STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method, Conserv. Genet. Res., 2012, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 359—361.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Excoffier, L., Laval, G., and Schneider, S., Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis, Evol. Bioinform. Online, 2005, vol. 1, pp. 47—50. PMCID: PMC2658868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goudet, J., FSTAT (version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics, J. Hered., 1995, vol. 86, pp. 485—486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goudet, J., FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3), 2001. http://www2.unil.ch/popgen/softwares/fstat.htm.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Takezaki, N., Nei, M., and Tamura, K., POPTREEW: web version of POPTREE for constructing population trees from allele frequency data and computing some other quantities, Mol. Biol. Evol., 2014, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1622—1624.  https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rousset, F., Genepop’007: a complete re-implementation of the Genepop software for Windows and Linux, Mol. Ecol. Notes, 2008, vol. 8, pp. 103—106.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01606x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Feoktistova, N.Yu., Meschersky, I.G., Bogomolov, P.L., et al., Phylogeographic structure of the common hamster (Cricetus cricetus L.): Late Pleistocene connections between Caucasus and Western European populations, PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 11. e0187527.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187527
  19. 19.
    Vereshchagin, N.K., Mlekopitayushchie Kavkaza (Mammals of the Caucasus), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1959.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tembotov, A.K., Opredelitel’ mlekopitayushchikh Severnogo Kavkaza (The Guidebook to Mammals of the North Caucasus), Nal’chik: Tipogragia im. Revolyutsii 1905 Goda, 1965.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Panteleev, P.A., Gryzuny Palearktiki (Rodents of the Palearctic), Moscow: Inst. Probl. Ekol. Evol. Russ. Akad. Nauk, 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Yu. Feoktistova
    • 1
    Email author
  • I. G. Meschersky
    • 1
  • P. L. Bogomolov
    • 1
  • S. I. Meschersky
    • 2
  • N. S. Poplavskaya
    • 1
  • M. M. Chunkov
    • 3
  • V. V. Yufereva
    • 4
  • V. A. Tel’pov
    • 5
  • A. V. Surov
    • 1
  1. 1.Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Department of Zoology and Ecology, Moscow State Pedagogical UniversityMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Precaspian Institute of Biological Resources, Dagestan Scientific Center, Russian Academy of SciencesMakhachkalaRussia
  4. 4.National Park KislovodskiyKislovodskRussia
  5. 5.Inter-District Territorial Station of Young Naturalists of the Resort City of KislovodskKislovodskRussia

Personalised recommendations