Advertisement

Russian Journal of Genetics

, Volume 50, Issue 1, pp 55–60 | Cite as

Chemosignals from isolated females have antimutagenic effect in dividing the cells of bone marrow from male mice of the CBA strain

  • E. V. DaevEmail author
  • T. S. Glinin
  • A. V. Dukelskaya
Animal Genetics

Abstract

A level of X-ray induced mitotic disturbances in the cells of the bone marrow of male mice was studied under the modifying influence of chemosignals from isolated adult female mice of the CBA strain. It has been shown that the frequency of chromosomal aberrations in irradiated (4 Gr) males after exposing them for 24 hours on bedding soiled with female chemosignals is lower than in irradiated males in cages with clean bedding. The mechanisms and importance of the antimutagenic effect of female house mouse chemosignals are discussed.

Keywords

Bone Marrow Cell House Mouse Cytogenetic Effect Antimutagenic Effect Irradiate Male 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Koyama, S., Primer effects by conspecific odors in house mice: a new perspective in the study of primer effects on reproductive activities, Horm. Behav., 2004, vol. 46, pp. 303–310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tirindelli, R., Dibattista, M., Pifferi, S., and Menini, A., From pheromones to behavior, Physiol. Rev., 2009, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 921–956.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Daev, E.V., Glinin, T.S., and Dukelskaya, A.V., Pheromones and adaptive bystander-mutagenesis in mice, in Radiobiology and Environmental Security, Mothersill, C.E., Korogodina, V., and Seymour, C.B., Eds., Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag, 2011, pp. 153–162.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daev, E.V., Genetic aspects of stress neuroendocrinology, in Neuroendocrinology Research Developments, Penkava, N.S. and Haight, L.R., Eds., Hauppauge: Nova Science, 2010, pp. 119–133.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Daev, E.V., Glinin, T.S., and Dukelskaya, A.V., The role of social factors in the regulation of stability of the cell genetic machinery in animals, Dokl. Biochem. Biophys., 2010, vol. 435, pp. 299–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Daev, E.V., Glinin, T.S., and Dukelskaya, A.V., The balance hypothesis of the effect of socially important volatile chemosignals on reactivity of chromosome machinery of bone marrow dividing cells in the house mouse Mus musculus L., J. Evol. Biochem. Physiol., 2012, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 280–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kelliher, K.R. and Wersinger, S.R., Olfactory regulation of the sexual behavior and reproductive physiology of the laboratory mouse: effects and neural mechanisms, ILAR J. NRC, 2008, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 28–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Daev, E.V. Genetic Effects of Olfactory Stresses: Research of House Mice, Saarbrucken: Lambert Acad. Publ., 2011.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Daev, E.V. and Dukel’skaya, A.V., Induction of meiotic disturbances in spermatocytes I by pheromones as an inhibiting mechanism of male reproductive function in house mice, Tsitologiya, 2005, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 505–509.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schellinck, H.M., Smyth, C., Brown, R.E., and Wilkinson, M., Odor-induced sexual maturation and expression of c-fos in the olfactory system of juvenile female mice, Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res., 1993, vol. 74, pp. 138–141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Veyrac, A., Wang, G., Baum, M.J., and Bakker, J., The main and accessory olfactory systems of female mice are activated differentially by dominant versus subordinate male urinary odors, Brain Res., 2011, vol. 1402, pp. 20–29.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Daev, E.V., Pheromonal regulation of genetic processes: research on the house mouse (Mus musculus L.), Russ. J. Genet., 1994, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 964–970.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Daev, E.V., Sverdlova, O.L., Matskevich, O.A., and Antonyuk, E.V., Cytogenetic effect of pheromones on bone marrow cells of male house mice (Mus musculus L.), Russ. J. Genet., 1995, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 541–544.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Daev, E.V. and Poluekhina, E.V., Cytogenetic effect of volatile components of urine of mature animals on bone marrow cells of young female house mice Mus musculus L., Russ. J. Genet., 1996, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 357–360.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Daev, E.V. and Sverdlova, O.L., Analysis for pheromone-induced cytogenetic disturbances depending on major urinary proteins of laboratory mouse males, Russ. J. Genet., 2002, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 132–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Novikov, S.N., Tsapygina, R.I., Daev, E.V., and Togo, E.F., Effect of natural compounds of biogenic origin on the behavior and generative function of male house mice, Mus musculus L., Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1982, vol. 262, no. 3, pp. 746–747.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Novikov, S.N., Daev, E.V., and Tsapygina, R.I., Action of the volatile components of the urine on the generative function of sexually immature male house mice Mus musculus L., Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1985, vol. 281, no. 6, pp. 1506–1508.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Daev, E.V., Stress, chemocommunication, and the physiological hypothesis of mutation, Russ. J. Genet., 2007, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 1082–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Daev, E.V., Surinov, B.P., Dukel’skaya, A.V., and Marysheva, T.M., Chromosomal abnormalities and spleenocyte production in laboratory mouse males after exposure to stress chemosignals, Cell Tissue Biol., 2007, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 696–701.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jemiolo, B. and Novotny, M., Inhibition of sexual maturation in juvenile female and male mice by chemosignal of female origin, Physiol. Behav., 1994, vol. 55, pp. 519–522.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mugford, R.A. and Nowell, N.W., Pheromones and their effect on aggression in mice, Nature, 1970, vol. 226, pp. 967–968.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mugford, R.A. and Nowell, N.W., Endocrine control over production and activity of the anti-aggression pheromone from female mice, J. Endocrinol., 1971, vol. 49, pp. 225–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Maruniak, J.A. and Bronson, F.H., Gonadotropic responses of male mice to female urine, Endocrinology, 1976, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 963–969.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Maruniak, J.A., Coquelin, A., and Bronson, F.H., The release of LH in male mice in response to female urinary odors: characteristics of the response in young males, Biol. Reprod., 1978, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 251–255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Litvinova, E.A., Goncharova, E.P., Zaydman, A.M., et al., Female scent signals enhance the resistance of male mice to influenza, PLoS One, 2010, vol. 5, no. 3, p. e9473.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Surinov, B.P and Isaeva, V.G., Immunomodulation effects volatile secretion of animals at postradiation immunodeficiency conditions, Radiats. Biol., Radioekol., 2008, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 665–670.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Daev, E.V., Kazarova, V.E., Vyborova, A.M., and Dukelskaya, A.V., Effects of “pheromone-like” pyrazine-containing compounds on stability of genetic apparatus in bone marrow cells of the male house mouse, Mus musculus L., J. Evol. Biochem. Physiol., 2009, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 589–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Glotov, N.V., Zhivotovskii, L.A., Khovanov, N.V., and Khromov-Borisov, N.N., Biometriya, (Biometry), Leningrad: Leningrad Gos. Univ., 1982.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lobashev, M.E., Ponomarenko, V.V., Polyanskaya, G.G., and Tsapygina, R.I., On the role of nervous system in regulation of various genetic and cytological processes, Zh. Evol. Biokhim. Fiziol., 1973, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 396–406.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lopatina, N.G., Ponomarenko, V.V., and Smirnova, G.P., Hypothesis of nervous regulation of the process of genetic information realization, in Problemy vysshei nervnoi deyatel’nosti i neirofiziologii (Problems of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology), Leningrad: Nauka, 1975, pp. 107–121.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kerkis, Yu.Ya. and Skorova, S.V., On factors, controlling the spontaneous mutation process, Inf. Byull. Nauch. Sov. Probl. Radiobiol., 1977, no. 20, pp. 51–52.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kerkis, Yu.Ya., Osetrova, G.D., Loginova, V.V., et al., Genetic and physiological (humoral) factors, controlling the induced and spontaneous mutation process in mammals, in Problemy teoreticheskoi i prikladnoi genetiki (Problems in Theoretical and Applied Genetics), Novosibirsk, 1973, pp. 75–94.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dyuzhikova, N.A., Bykovskaya, N.V., Vaido, A.I., et al., Rate of chromosomal aberrations induced by short-term stress in rats selected for excitability of the nervous system, Russ. J. Genet., 1996, vol. 32, pp. 851–853.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sacharczuk, M., Jaszczak, K., and Sadowski, B., Cytogenetic comparison of the sensitivity to mutagens in mice selected for high (HA) and low (LA) swim stress-induced analgesia, Mutat. Res., Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen., 2003, vol. 535, no. 1, pp. 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Borodin, P.M. and Belyaev, D.K., The influence of stress on crossing over frequency in the second chromosome of house mouse, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1980, vol. 253, no. 3, pp. 727–729.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dyuzhikova, N.A., Savenko, Yu.N., Vaido, A.I., et al., Changes in the heterochromatin hippocampal neurons’ state under conditions of post-traumatic stress disorder modeling depends on characteristics of nervous system excitability, Zh. EKO, 2003, nos. 10–11, pp. 67–68.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Opol’skii, A.F., The influence of the hypothalamus on mutagenesis in somatic cells of animals, in Chuvstvitel’nost’ organizmov k mutagennym faktoram i vozniknovenie mutatsii (The Sensitivity of Organisms to Mutagenic Factors and Appearance of Mutations), Vilnus: Vilnus Gos. Univ., 1982, pp. 20–21.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Seredenin, S.B., Durnev, A.D., and Vedernikova, A.A., Effect of emotional stress on the frequency of chromosomal aberrations in mouse bone marrow cells, Byull. Eksp. Biol. Med., 1980, no. 7, pp. 91–92.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Azzam, E.I., de Toledo, S.M., and Little, J.B., Stress signaling from irradiated to non-irradiated cells, Curr. Cancer Drug Targets, 2004, vol. 4, pp. 53–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hei, T.K., Zhou, H., Ivanov, V.N., et al., Mechanism of radiation-induced bystander effects: a unifying model, JPP, 2008, vol. 60, pp. 943–950.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Vaido, A.I., Dyuzhikova, N.A., Shiryaeva, N.V., et al., Systemic control of the molecular, cell, and epigenetic mechanisms of long-lasting consequences of stress, Russ. J. Genet., 2009, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 298–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nersesyan, A.K., Boffetta, P., Sarkisyan, T.F., et al., Chromosome aberrations in lymphocytes of persons exposed to an earthquake in Armenia, Scand. J. Work, Environ. Health, 2001, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 120–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Koterov, A.N. and Biryukov, A.P., The possibility of determining of anomalies and pathologies in the off-spring of liquidators of Chernobyl accident by non-radiation factors, Int. J. Low Radiat. (IJLR), 2011, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 256–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Daev, E.V., The effect of exogenous metabolites on cytogenetic characteristics of spermatogenesis and reproductive function of house mouse males, Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Leningrad: Leningrad State Univ., 1983.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tsapygina, R.I., Daev, E.V., and Novikov, S.N., The influence of exogenous metabolites of house mouse males on the cell proliferation process in generative tissues of young animals after single and multiple treatments, Issled. Genet., 1981, no. 9, pp. 17–23.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kohl, J.V., Atzmueller, M., Fink, B., and Grammer, K., Human pheromones: integrating neuroendocrinology and ethology, Neuroendocrinol. Lett., 2001, vol. 22, pp. 309–321.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ziegler, A., Dohr, G., and Uchanska-Ziegler, B., Possible roles for products of polymorphic MHC and linked olfactory receptor genes during selection processes in reproduction, Am. J. Reprod. Immunol., 2002, vol. 48, pp. 34–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Genetics and BiotechnologySaint-Petersburg State UniversitySaint-PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations