Chromosomal mosaicism in spontaneous abortions: Analysis of 650 cases
- 54 Downloads
It is known that up to 50% spontaneous abortions (SA) in the first trimester of pregnancy are associated with chromosomal abnormalities. We studied mosaic forms of chromosomal abnormalities in 650 SA specimens using interphase MFISH and DNA probes for chromosomes 1, 9, 13/21, 14/22, 15, 16, 18, X, and Y. Numerical chromosomal abnormalities were discovered in 58.2% (378 cases). They contained combined chromosomal abnormalities (aneuploidy of several chromosomes or aneuploidy in combination with polyploidy in the same specimen) in 7.7% (29 cases) or 4.5% of the entire SA sample; autosomal trisomy, in 45% (18.2% in chromosome 16, 8.9% in chromosomes 14/22, 7.9% in chromosomes 13/21, 3.1% in chromosome 18, and 1.4% in chromosome 9). Chromosome X aneuploidy was found in 27% cases, among which 9.6% represented chromosome X monosomy. Polyploidy was observed in 22.9% cases. In 5.1% cases, we observed mosaic form of autosomal monosomy. Among the SA cases with chromosomal abnormalities mosaicism was observed in 50.3% (∼ 25% of the entire SA sample). The results of the present study indicate that significant amount of chromosomal abnormalities in SA cells are associated with disturbances in mitotic chromosome separation, which represents the most common cause of intrauterine fetal death. It was also shown that original collection of DNA probes and the technique of interphase MFISH could be useful for detection of chromosomal mosaicism in prenatal cell specimens.
KeywordsChromosomal Abnormality Spontaneous Abortion Intrauterine Fetal Death Chromosomal Mosaicism Mosaic Form
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Vorsanova, S.G., Yurov, Yu.B., and Chernyshov, V.N., Meditsinskaya tsitogenetika (Medical Cytogenetics), Moscow: Medpraktika, 2006.Google Scholar
- 2.Vorsanova, S.G., Iourov, I.Yu., Soloviev, I.V., and Yurov, Yu.B., Geterokhromatinovye raiony khromosom cheloveka: kliniko-biologicheskie aspekty (Heterochromatic Regions of Human Chromosomes: Clinicobiological Aspects), Moscow: Medpraktika, 2008.Google Scholar
- 10.Soloviev, I.V., Yurov, Yu.B., Vorsanova, S.G., et al., Fluorescence in situ Hybridization Analysis of α-Satellite DNA in Cosmid Libraries, Specific for Human Chromosomes 13, 21 and 22, Russ. J. Genet., 1998, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 1470–1479.Google Scholar
- 12.Yurov, Yu.B., Soloviev, I.V., Vorsanova, S.G., et al., High Resolution Fluorescence in situ Hybridization Using Cyanine and Fluorescein Dyes: Ultra-Rapid Chromosome Detection by Directly Fluorescently Labeled Alphoid DNA Probes, Hum. Genet., 1996, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 390–398.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Vorsanova, S.G., Iourov, I.Yu., Voinova-Ulas, V.Yu., et al., Partial Monosomy 7q34-qter and 21pter-q22.13 Due to Cryptic Unbalanced Translocation t(7; 21) but not Monosomy of the Whole Chromosome 21: A Case Report Plus Review of the Literature, Mol. Cytogenet., 2008, vol. 1, p. 13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Soloviev, I.V., Yurov, Yu.B., Vorsanova, S.G., and Malet, P., Microwave Activation of Fluorescence in situ Hybridization: A Novel Method for Rapid Chromosome Detection and Analysis, Focus, 1994, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 115–116.Google Scholar