Advertisement

Russian Journal of Genetics

, Volume 43, Issue 10, pp 1147–1152 | Cite as

Removing endosymbiotic Wolbachia specifically decreases lifespan of females and competitiveness in a laboratory strain of Drosophila melanogaster

  • I. D. Alexandrov
  • M. V. Alexandrova
  • I. I. GoryachevaEmail author
  • N. V. Rochina
  • E. V. Shaikevich
  • I. A. Zakharov
General Genetics

Abstract

To understand specific symbiotic relationships ensuring stable existing of the bacterium Wolbachia in laboratory strains of Drosophila melanogaster, the imago lifespan and senescence rate, as well as competitiveness, have been evaluated as components of fitness in females from the following laboratory strains: (1) inbred strain 95 infected with Wolbachia; (2) two uninfected strains obtained by tetracycline treatment that were genetically similar to strain 95; and (3) two control, uninfected, wild-type laboratory strains that were used to assess the possible effects of the antibiotic on the studied characters in the absence of Wolbachia. The results have shown that infected females have longer lifespan and competitiveness than females with the same genotype uninfected with Wolbachia. The increase in the senescence and mortality rates with age was also slower in infected females. It is noteworthy that tetracycline does not affect the lifespan of females from the two control, uninfected, wild-type strains. Therefore, the antibiotic is not the cause of the positive changes in fitness that were observed in infected females. The obtained results are the first direct evidence that the relationships in the Wolbachia-D. melanogaster symbiotic system are mutualistic rather than parasitic, at least in micropopulations adapted to laboratory conditions.

Keywords

Tetracycline Laboratory Strain Cytoplasmic Incompatibility Wolbachia Infection Competition Index 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Summer, J.W., Storch, G.A., Buller, R.S., et al., PCR Amplification and Phylogenetic Analysis of GroESL Oregon Sequences from Ehrlichia ewengii and Ehrlichia muris, J. Clin. Microbiol., 2000, vol. 38, pp. 2746–2749.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dumler, J.S., Barbet, A.F., Bekker, C.P., et al., Reorganization of Genera in the Families Rickettsiaceae and Anaplasmataceae in the Order Rickettsiales: Unification of Some Species of Ehrlichia with Anaplasma, Cowdria with Ehrlichia and Ehrlichia with Neorickettsia: Descriptions of Six New Species Combinations and Designation of Ehrlichia equi and “HGE Agent” as Subjective Synonyms of Ehrlichia phagocytophilum, Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 2001, vol. 51, pp. 2145–2165.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Taillardat-Bisch, A.-V., Rault, D., and Drancourt, M., RNA Polymerase β-Subunit-Based Phylogeny of Ehrlichia spp., Anaplasma spp., Neorickettsia spp. and Wolbachia pipientis, Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 2003, vol. 53, pp. 455–458.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jeyaprakash, A. and Hoy, M.A., Long PCR Improves Wolbachia DNA Amplification: wsp Sequences Found in 76% of Sixty-three Arthropod Species, Insect Mol. Biol., 2000, vol. 9, pp. 393–405.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Werren, J.H. and Windsor, D.M., Wolbachia Infection Frequencies in Insects: Evidence for a Global Equilibrium?, Proc. R. Soc. London B, 2000, vol. 267, pp. 1277–1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jiggins, F.M., Bentley, J.K., Majerus, M.E.N., and Hurst, G.D.D., How Many Species Are Infected with Wolbachia? Cryptic Sex Ratio Distorters Revealed to Be Common by Intensive Sampling, Proc. R. Soc. London B, 2001, vol. 268, pp. 1123–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stouthamer, R., Breeuwer, A.J., and Hurst, G.D.D., Wolbachia pipientis: Microbial Manipulator of Arthropod Reproduction, Annu. Rev. Microbiol., 1999, vol. 53, pp. 71–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Charlat, S., Hurst, G.D.D., and Mercot, H., Evolutionary Consequences of Wolbachia Infections, Genetics, 2003, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 217–223.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hoffmann, A.A., Hercus, M., and Dagher, H., Population Dynamics of the Wolbachia Infection Causing Cytoplasmic Incompatibility in Drosophila melanogaster, Genetics, 1998, vol. 148, pp. 221–231.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Clark, M.E., Anderson, C.L., Cande, J., and Karr, T.L., Widespread Prevalence of Wolbachia in Laboratory Stocks and Implications for Drosophila Research, Genetics, 2005, vol. 170, pp. 1667–1675.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Clark, M.E. and Karr, T.L., Distribution of Wolbachia within Drosophila Reproductive Tissues: Implications for the Expression of Cytoplasmic Incompatibility, Integr. Comp. Biol., 2002, vol. 42, pp. 332–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reynolds, K.T. and Hoffmann, A.A., Male Age, Host Effects and the Weak Expression or Non-Expression of Cytoplasmic Incompatibility in Drosophila Strains Infected by Maternally Transmitted Wolbachia, Genet. Res., 2002, vol. 80, pp. 79–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Werren, J.H., Wolbachia Run Amok, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1997, vol. 94, pp. 11154–11155.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Min, K.-T. and Benzer, S., Wolbachia, Normally a Symbiont of Drosophila, Can Be Virulent, Causing Degeneration and Early Death, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1997, vol. 94, pp. 10792–10796.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Olsen, K., Reynolds, T., and Hoffmann, A.A., A Field Cage Test of the Effects of the Endosymbiont Wolbachia on Drosophila melanogaster, Heredity, 2001, vol. 86, pp. 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fry, A.J. and Rand, D.M., Wolbachia Interactions that Determine Drosophila melanogaster Survival, Evolution, 2002, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 1976–1981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fry, A.J., Palmer, M.R., and Rand, D.M., Variable Fitness Effects of Wolbachia Infection in Drosophila melanogaster, Heredity, 2003, vol. 93, pp. 379–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dedeine, F., Vavre, F., Fleury, F., et al., Removing Symbiotic Wolbachia Bacteria Specifically Inhibits Oogenesis in a Parasitic Wasp, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2001, vol. 98, pp. 6247–6252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Braig, H.R., Zhou, W., Dobson, I.L., and O’Neil, I.L., Cloning and Characterization of a Gene Encoding the Major Surface Protein of the Bacterial Endosymbiont Wolbachia pipientis, J. Bacteriol., 1998, vol. 180, pp. 2373–2378.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bashkirov, V.N., Krutovskii, K.V., and Kakpakov, V.T., Population Genetic Study of Drosophila melanogaster from the Seychelles: Allozyme Allele Frequency and Morphological and Physiological Traits, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1987, vol. 292, no. 1, pp. 215–220.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Starr, D.J. and Cline, T.W., A Host-Parasite Interaction Rescues Drosophila Oogenesis Defects, Nature, 2002, vol. 418, no. 4, pp. 76–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jungen, H. and Hartl, D.L., Average Fitness of Populations of Drosophila melanogaster as Estimated Using Compound Autosome Strain, Evolution, 1979, vol. 33, pp. 359–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Haymer, D.S. and Hartl, D.L., The Experimental Assessment of Fitness in Drosophila: 1. Comparative Measures of Competitive Reproductive Success, Genetics, 1982, vol. 102, pp. 455–466.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Clarke, J.M. and Smith, J.M., The Genetics and Cytology of Drosophila subobscura: XI. Hybrid Vigour and Longevity, J. Genet., 1955, vol. 53, pp. 172–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Drummel, T., Ching, A., Seroude, L., et al., Drosophila Lifespan Enhancement by Exogenous Bacteria, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2004, vol. 101, no. 35, pp. 12974–12979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Altukhov Yu.P., Allozyme Heterozygosity, Sexual Maturation Rate and Longevity, Russ. J. Genet., 1998, vol. 34, no 7, pp. 751–760.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pletcher, S.D. and Curtsinger, J.W., Mortality Plateaus and the Evolution of Senescence: Why Are Old-Age Mortality Rates So Low?, Evolution, 1998, vol. 52, pp. 454–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Khazaeli, A.A. and Curtsinger, J.W., Genetic Analysis of Extended Lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster: III. On the Relationship between Artificially Selected and Wild Stocks, Genetics, 2000, vol. 109, pp. 245–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. D. Alexandrov
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. V. Alexandrova
    • 1
    • 2
  • I. I. Goryacheva
    • 1
    Email author
  • N. V. Rochina
    • 3
  • E. V. Shaikevich
    • 1
  • I. A. Zakharov
    • 1
  1. 1.Vavilov Institute of General GeneticsRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Joint Institute for Nuclear ResearchDubna, Moscow oblastRussia
  3. 3.Institute of Molecular GeneticsRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations