Cytogenetic study of recurrent miscarriages and their parents
- 73 Downloads
There is substantial evidence that genetic alterations are contributing factors to the risk for recurrent miscarriages. This study was conducted to determine the frequency and contribution of chromosomal abnormalities in miscarriages and in couples with recurrent miscarriages. We studied a total of 41 miscarriages and their parents with a history of 2–11 recurrent miscarriages. Chromosomal analysis from chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and fetal tissues were performed according to standard cytogenetic methods using G-banding technique. Major chromosomal aberrations and polymorphic variants were found in 51 and 4.8%, respectively. The chromosomal abnormalities were structural (34.4%) and numerical (65.1%) of which 26.1, 21.7, 8.7 and 8.7% were fetal sex aneuploid, triploid, mosaics and trisomic, respectively. Unbalanced and balanced rearrangements were found in 17.2 and 8.6% of all abnormalities, respectively. Major chromosomal abnormalities in couples were seen in 4.9%. The chromosomal abnormalities associated with pregnancy losses and recurrent miscarriages are mostly numerical ones. The incidence of balanced translocations found here is 4.9% which is near to the mode (about 3–6%) observed in the previous studies. Those frequencies are greater than in the general population (0.3%). This indicates that balanced translocations, seen in parents, have some importance in causing miscarriage. The major parental chromosomal aberrations are significantly associated with fetal wastage. Mosaicism should be taken into account for cytogenetic analyses of pregnancy losses. Thus, cytogenetic analyses should be recommended in couples with recurrent miscarriages, when clinical data fail to clarify the cause.
KeywordsPregnancy Loss Turner Syndrome Recurrent Miscarriage Pericentric Inversion Abnormal Karyotype
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Jacobs, P.A. and Hassold, T.J., Chromosome Abnormalities: Origin and Etiology in Abortion and Live Births, Human Genetics, Vogal F. and Sperling K., Eds., Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1987, pp. 233–234.Google Scholar
- 4.Gorski, J., Emanuel, B., Zackai, E., et al., Complex Chromosomal Rearrangements: Meiotic and Sister Chromatid Exchange Analysis, Am. J. Med. Genet., 1982, vol. 34, p. 126A.Google Scholar
- 16.Epstein, C., Down Syndrome (Trisomy 21), The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease, Scriver, C.R., Beaudet, A.L., Sly, W.S., and Vale, D., Eds., 8th ed., New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001, vol. 1, pp. 1223–1256.Google Scholar
- 20.James, D.K., Ster, P.J., Weiner, C.P., and Gonik, B., High Risk Pregnancy, Harcourt Brace, 1999.Google Scholar
- 22.Appels, R., Morris, R., Gill, B.S., and May, C.E., Chromosome Biology, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1998.Google Scholar
- 27.Imai, A. and Tamaya, T., Chromosome Abnormalities Associated with Recurrent Abortion, Commun. Mol. Pathol. Pharmacol., 1996, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 323–326.Google Scholar
- 29.Amiel, A., Sardos-Albertini, F., and Fejgin, M.D., Interchromosomal Effect Leading to an Increase Aneuploidy in Sperm Nuclei in a Man Heterozygous for Pericentric Inversion (inv. 9) and C-Heterochromatin, J. Med. Genet., 2001, vol. 46, pp. 245–250.Google Scholar
- 31.Gardner, R.J.M. and Sutherland, G.R., Chromosome Abnormalities and Genetic Counselling, 2nd ed., New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1996.Google Scholar
- 32.Phung, T.T., Byrd, J.R., and McDonough, P.G., Etiologies and Subsequent Reproductive Performance of 100 Couples with Recurrent Abortions, Fertil. Steril., 1979, vol. 32, p. 389.Google Scholar