Russian Journal of Genetics

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 181–189 | Cite as

Phylogenetic reconstructions in the genus Capra (Bovidae, Artiodactyla) based on the mitochondrial DNA analysis

  • E. Y. Kazanskaya
  • M. V. Kuznetsova
  • A. A. Danilkin
Animal Genetics


Mitochondrial genome fragments were examined in all species of the genus Capra (Bovidae, Artiodactyla). Phylogenetic analysis was carried out using 59 cytochrome b gene sequences (392 bp), and 22 sequences of the mtDNA variable fragment (402 bp). In the control region, two unique deletions were revealed. One of the deletions was found only in Capra cylindricornis (17 bp), while another one grouped C. caucasica with C. aegagrus (1 bp). The group of Caucasian wild goats splits into two clades, and furthermore, the sequences of C. caucasica demonstrate remarkable similarity to the sequences of C. aegagrus, while C. cylindricornis seems to have evolved independently for a long period of time. It was demonstrated that C. pyrenaica and C. ibex were extremely close to one another. Capra sibirica formed an outer group relative to the other species, and according to our data, was the most ancient species of the genus. On the contrary, genetic distance separating C. falconeri (the most independent species of the genus related to its morphology) from the other species is small.


Control Region Maximum Parsimony Maximum Parsimony Analysis Control Region Sequence Capra Hircus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Gromova, V.I., Osteological Differences between the Genera Capra (Goats) and Ovis (Sheep), Tr. Komis. Izuch. Chetv. Perioda, 1953, vol. 10, no. 1.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Geptner, V.G. and Naumov, N.P., Mlekopitayushchie Sovetskogo Soyuza (Mammals of the Soviet Union), Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola, 1961, vol. 1.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sokolov, V.E., Sistematika mlekopitayushchikh (Systematics of Mammals), Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola, 1979.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sokolov, I.I., Fauna SSSR. Mlekopitayushchie. Kopytnye zveri (otryady Perissodactyla i Artiodactyla) (Fauna of USSR. Mammals: Ungulate (Orders Perissodactyla and Artiodactyla)), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1959, vol. 1, issue 3.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sokolov, V.E. and Tembotov, A.K., Pozvonochnye Kavkaza. Mlekopitayushchie: Kopytnye (Mammals: Ungulates), Moscow: Nauka, 1993.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tembotov, A.K., Distribution and Number of Turs in Kabardino-Balkarian ASSR, in I Vsesoyuznoe soveshchanie po mlekopitayushchim (I All-Union Workshop on Mammals), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1961, vol. 1.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tembotov, A.K., On Geographic Variability of Turs (Carpa caucasica Guld.) in Northern Caucasus, in Fauna, ekologiya i okhrana zhivotnykh Severnogo Kavkaza (Fauna, Ecology, and Animal Conservation in Northern Caucasus), Nal’chik, 1974, issue 2, pp. 118–132.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ellerman, J.R. and Morrison-Scott, T.C.S., Checklist of Palaearctic and Indian Mammals 1758 to 1946, London: British Mus. Nat. Hist., 1951.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Haltenorth, T., Klassifikation der Saugetiere: Artiodactyla, Handbuch der Zoologie, 1963, vol. 8, no. 32(18), pp. 1–167.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Perez, J., Granados, J., Soriguers, R., et al., Distribution, Status and Conservation Problems of the Spanish Ibex, Capra pyrenaica (Mammalia: Artiodactyla), Mammal Rev., 2002, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 26–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lydekker, R., Catalogue of the Ungulate Mammals in the British Museum. Artiodactyla, Fam. Bovidae, London: British. Mus. Nat. Hist., 1913, vol. 17, pp. 1–249.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dinnik, N.Ya., Zveri Kavkaza. Ch. 1. Kitoobraznye i kopytnye (Animals of the Caucasus, part 1: Cetacean and Ungulate), Tiflis, 1910.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Razevig, V.A., Caucasian Goats (Turs), Psovaya i Ruzheinaya Okhota, 1904, no. 4, pp. 25–38; no. 5, pp. 82–99; no. 6, pp. 38–54.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pavlinov, I.Ya., Sistematika sovremennykh mlekopitayushchikh (Systematics of Contemporary Mammals), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 2003.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schwarz, E., On Ibex and Wild Goat, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 1935, Ser. 10, vol. 16, pp. 433–437.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hassanin, A., Pasquet, E., and Vigne, J., Molecular Systematics of the Subfamily Caprinae (Artiodactyla, Bovidae) as Determined from Cytochrome B Sequences, J. Mam. Evol., 1998, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 217–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Manceau, V., Despres, L., Bouvet, J., and Taberlet, P., Systematics of the Genus Capra Inferred from Mitochondrial DNA Sequence Data, Mol. Phylogen. Evol., 1999, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 504–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mannen, H., Nagata, Y., and Tsuji, S., Mitochondrial DNA Reveal that Domestic Goat (Capra hircus) Are Genetically Affected by Two Subspecies of Bezoar (Capra aegagrus), Biochem. Genet., 2001, vol. 39, nos. 5–6, pp. 145–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sultana, S., Mannen, H., and Tsuji, S., Mitochondrial DNA Diversity of Pakistani Goats, Anim. Genet., 2003, vol. 34, pp. 417–421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Takada, T., Kikkawa, Y., Yonekawa, H., et al., Bezoar (Capra aegagrus) Is a Matriarchal Candidate for Ancestor of Domestic Goat (Capra hircus): Evidence from the Mitochondrial DNA Diversity, Biochem. Genet., 1997, vol. 35, nos. 9–10, pp. 315–326.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kuznetsova, M. V., Reconstruction of Phylogenetic Relations in the Family of Hollow-Horned Ungulates (Bovidae; Artiodastyla) Inferred from Nuclear and Mitochondrial DNA Sequence Data, Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow: Inst. fiziko-khimich. biologii im. A.N. Belozerskogo, 2002.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kholodova, M.V., Sorokin, P.A., and Lushchekina, A.A., Changes of Genetic Diversity of European Saiga (Saiga tatarica) Population during the Period of Dramatic Population Number Decrease, Dokl. Akad. Nauk, 2005, vol. 404, no. 2, pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kholodova, M.V., Lushchekina, A.A., Neronov, V.M., et al., Comparative Analysis of Kalmyk and Mongolian Saiga Genetic Diversity, Dokl. Akad. Nauk, 2001, vol. 376, no. 6, pp. 847–849.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hall, T.A., BioEdit: A User-Friendly Biological Sequence Alignment Editor and Analysis Program for Windows 95/98/NT, Nucl. Acids. Symp., 1999, Ser. 41, pp. 95–98.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kumar, S., Tamura, K., Jakobsen, I., and Nei, M., MEGA3: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Software, Arizona State Univ., 2004Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Swofford, D.L., PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony and Other Methods, Version 4, Sunderland: Sinauer, 2000.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Luikart, G., Gielly, L., Excoffier, L., and Taberlett, P., Multiple Maternal Origings and Weak Phylogeografic Structure in Domestic Goats, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2001, vol. 98, no. 10.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Y. Kazanskaya
    • 1
  • M. V. Kuznetsova
    • 1
  • A. A. Danilkin
    • 1
  1. 1.Severtsov Institute of Ecology and EvolutionRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations