Advertisement

Effects of Static Magnetic Fields on the Antioxidant System of Almond Seeds

  • F. Abdollahi
  • H. AmiriEmail author
  • V. Niknam
  • F. Ghanati
  • K. Mahdigholi
RESEARCH PAPERS
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

During the evolutionary process, all living cells experience natural magnetic fields (geo-magnetic fields) as a usual part of their environment. Living organisms are adapted with natural fields, but magnetic waves derived from modern life may change the metabolism of cells. In this experiment, the effects of static magnetic fields (SMF) on total sugar, the contents of soluble proteins, proline, malondialdehyde (MDA), phenolic compounds and anthocyanin, as well as the activity of antioxidant enzymes and total antioxidant capacity, were studied in two species of Amygdalus i.e., Amygdalus scoparia Spach and Amygdalus eburnea Spach. Unique seeds of each species were treated with or without 10 mT SMF for four days, 5 h each day. A fresh weight of A. eburnea was reduced by SMFs. Exposure to SMFs also increased the contents of proline, phenolic compounds and anthocyanin, and improved the activity of ascorbate peroxidase (APX), guaiacol peroxidase (GPX) and catalase (CAT). According to the results, it seemed that SMFs induce the production of free radicals. So almond seeds produce several antioxidants to be more resistant.

Keywords:

Amygdalus scoparia A. eburnea antioxidant lipid peroxidation proline content static magnetic field 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS

The financial support for this research was provided partly by the College of Science at Lorestan University and partly by University of Tehran and Tarbiat Modarres University.

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. This article does not contain any studies involving animals or human participants performed by any of the authors.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Asghar, T., Jamil, Y., Iqbal, M., and Abbas, M., Laser light and magnetic field stimulation effect on biochemical, enzymes activities and chlorophyll contents in soybean seeds and seedlings during early growth stages, J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol., 2016, vol. 165, pp. 283–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Serdyukov, Y.A. and Novitskii, Y.I., Impact of weak permanent magnetic field on antioxidant enzyme activities in radish seedlings, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2013, vol. 60, pp. 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sen, A. and Alikamanoglu, S., Effects of static magnetic field pretreatment with and without PEG 6000 or NaCl exposure on wheat biochemical parameters, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2014, vol. 61, pp. 646–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Malinowska, I., Studziński, M., Malinowski, H., and Gadzikowska, M., Retention and separation changes of ternary and quaternary alkaloids from Chelidonium majus L. by TLC under the influence of external magnetic field, Chromatographia, 2017, vol. 80, pp. 923–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baxter, A., Mittler, R., and Suzuki, N., ROS as key players in plant stress signalling, J. Exp. Bot., 2014, vol. 65, pp. 1229–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shao, H.B., Chu, L.Y., Shao, M.A., Jaleel, C.A., and Mi, H.M., Higher plant antioxidants and redox signaling under environmental stresses, C. R. Biol., 2008, vol. 433, pp. 331–341.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gill, S.S. and Tuteja, N., Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants, Plant Physiol. Biochem., 2010, vol. 48, pp. 909–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kaur, G. and Asthir, B., Proline: a key player in plant abiotic stress tolerance, Biol. Plant., 2015, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 609–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fadda, A., Serra, M., Molinu, M.G., Azara, E., B-arberis, A., and Sanna, D., Reaction time and DPPH concentration influence antioxidant activity and kinetic parameters of bioactive molecules and plant extracts in the reaction with the DPPH radical, J. Food Comp. Anal., 2014, vol. 35, pp. 112–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sies, H., Role of metabolic H2O2 generation redox signaling and oxidative stress, J. Biol. Chem., 2014, vol. 289, pp. 8735–8741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Molassiotis, A., Sotiropoulos, T., Tanou, G., Kofidis, G., Diamantidis, G., and Therios, E., Antioxidant and anatomical responses in shoot culture of the apple rootstock MM 106 treated with NaCl, KCl, mannitol or sorbitol, Biol. Plant., 2006, vol. 50, pp. 61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ghanati, F., Abdolmaleki, P., Vaezzadeh, M., Ra-jabbeigi, E., and Yazdani, M., Application of magnetic field and iron in order to change medicinal products of Ocimum basilicum, Environmentalist, 2007, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 429–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hara, M., Oki, K., Hoshino, K., and Kuboi, T., Enhancement of anthocyanin biosynthesis by sugar in radish (Raphanus sativus) hypocotyl, Plant Sci., 2003, vol. 164, pp. 259–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peng, M., Guan, F., Tao, L., Li, R., Wang, C., and Meng, F., Analysis of genetic relationship on Amygdalus mira (Koehne) Ricker with other peach species using simple sequence repeat (SSR), Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 2015, vol. 62, pp. 98–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vafadar, M., Attar, F., and Maroofi, H., Trichome micromorphology in drupe of Amygdalus L. (Rosaceae) from Iran, Acta Bot. Croat., 2010, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 93–105.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aghaleh, M., Niknam, V., Ebrahimzadeh, H., and Razavi, K., Effect of salt stress on physiological and antioxidative responses in two species of Salicornia (S. persica and S. europaea), Acta Physiol. Plant., 2011, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 1261–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dubois, M., Gilles, K.A., Hamilton, J.K., Rebers, P., and Smith, F., Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances, Anal. Chem., 1956, vol. 28, pp. 350–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bates, L., Waldren, R., and Teare, I., Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies, Plant Soil, 1973, vol. 39, pp. 205–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bradford, M.M., A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein–dye binding, Anal. Biochem., 1976, vol. 72, nos. 1–2, pp. 248–254.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Giannopolitis, C.N. and Ries, S.K., Superoxide dismutases. I. Occurrence in higher plants, Plant Physiol., 1977, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 309–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Aebi, H., Catalase in vitro, Methods Enzymol., 1984, vol. 105, pp. 121–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Abeles, F.B. and Biles, C.L., Characterization of peroxidases in lignifying peach fruit endocarp, Plant Physiol., 1991, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 269–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nakano, Y. and Asada, K., Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts, Plant Cell Physiol., 1981, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 867–880.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Heath, R.L. and Packer, L., Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts. I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 1968, vol. 125, pp. 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Verma, O., Joshi, N., Pandey, S.T., Srivastava, R., and Guru, S., Comparative study of hydropriming to static magnetic field on seedling vigour and enzyme activity in wheat seed, Agric. Res., 2017, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 235–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chaitanya, B.S.K., Kumar, S., Anjaneyulu, E., Prasad, R.B.N., Sastry, P.S., and Reddy, A.R., Pi-votal role of sugar fluxes between the inner integument and endosperm in lipid synthesis during seed ontogeny in Jatropha curcas L., Ind. Crops Prod., 2015, vol. 76, pp. 1106–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jones, D.P., Hydrogen peroxide and central redox theory for aerobic life: a tribute to Helmut Sies: Scout, trailblazer, and Redox Pioneer, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 2016, vol. 595, pp. 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Selim, A.H. and El-Nady, M.F., Physio-anatomical responses of drought stressed tomato plants to magnetic field, Acta Astronaut., 2011, vol. 69, pp. 387–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Najafi, S., Heidari, R., and Jamei, R., Photosynthetic characteristics, membrane lipid levels and protein content in the Phaseolus vulgaris L. (cv. Sadri) exposed to magnetic field and silver nanoparticles, Bull. Environ. Pharmacol. Life Sci., 2014, vol. 3, pp. 72–76.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yao, Y., Li, Y., Yang, Y., and Li, C., Effect of seed pretreatment by magnetic field on the sensitivity of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) seedlings to ultraviolet-B radiation, Environ. Exp. Bot., 2005, vol. 54, pp. 286–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Abdollahi
    • 1
  • H. Amiri
    • 1
    Email author
  • V. Niknam
    • 2
  • F. Ghanati
    • 3
  • K. Mahdigholi
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biology, College of Science, Lorestan UniversityKhorramabadIran
  2. 2.Department of Plant Sciences, School of Biology, College of Sciences, University of TehranTehranIran
  3. 3.Scientific Boards, Tarbiat Modarres UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations