Expression Patterns, Activities and Sugar Metabolism Regulation of Sucrose Phosphate Synthase, Sucrose Synthase, Neutral Invertase and Soluble Acid Invertase in Different Goji Cultivars during Fruit Development
- 19 Downloads
Sugars are crucial factors that contribute to fruit flavor. To uncover the regulatory mechanism of sugar metabolism in developing fruit, we isolated four genes, encoding key enzymes (sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS—EC 22.214.171.124), sucrose synthase (SuSy—EC 126.96.36.199), neutral invertase (NI—EC 188.8.131.52) and soluble acid invertase (SAI—EC 184.108.40.206), related to sugar metabolism in Goji (Lycium barbarum L.) fruit and examined sugar content, gene expression and enzyme activities in developing fruit of two cultivars. The results showed that Ningqi No. 1 maintained high levels of hexose (glucose and fructose) and lower sucrose than Ningqi No. 3. Expression levels of SPS and NI were demonstrated to be tied to corresponding enzyme activities while SAI and SuSy were not connected to changes in enzyme activities during fruit development in either cultivar. In this sense, NI and SPS seem to play a major role in sugar metabolism. These findings suggested that cultivar Ningqi No 1. has enhanced hexose synthesis and hydrolysis of sucrose relative to Ningqi No. 3. This work demonstrated a novel function profile of sugar metabolism as well as relevant gene expression to explain how different sugar levels in different Goji cultivar fruits are maintained during fruit development.
Keywords:Lycium barbarum Goji sugar metabolism fruit development gene expression
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS
This study was supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of Ningxia (project no. 2018A0270), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (project no. 31260065) and (project no. 31560418) and West Light foundation of Chinese Academy of Sciences
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. This article does not contain any studies involving animals or human participants performed by any of the authors.
- 2.Feng, M., Zhang, N., and Song, C.B., Study on growth and development of wolfberry (Lycium barbarum L.) fruit, Seed, 2005, vol. 24, pp. 63–65.Google Scholar
- 5.Li, M., Feng, F., and Cheng, L., Expression patterns of genes involved in sugar metabolism and accumulation during apple fruit development, PLoS One, 2012, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
- 6.Hu, R.F., Jiang, H., and Li, Y.Y., Research advance on sucrose synthesize enzyme, North. Hortic., 2012, vol. 1, pp. 167–170.Google Scholar
- 11.Lester, G.E., Arias, L.S., and Gomez-Lim, M., Muskmelon fruit soluble acid invertase and sucrose phosphate synthase activity and polypeptide profiles during growth and maturation, J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 2001, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 33–36.Google Scholar
- 13.Signora, L., Galtier, N., Skøt, L., Lucas, H., and Foyer, C.H., Over-expression of sucrose phosphate synthase in Arabidopsis thaliana results in increased foliar sucrose/starch ratios and favours decreased foliar carbohydrate accumulation in plants after prolonged growth with CO2 enrichment, J. Exp. Bot., 1998, vol. 49, no. 321, pp. 669–680.Google Scholar
- 15.Strand, A., Zrenner, R., Trevanion, S., Stitt, M., Gustafsson, P., and Gardeström, P., Decreased expression of two key enzymes in the sucrose biosynthesis pathway, cytosolic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase and sucrose phosphate synthase, has remarkably different consequences for photosynthetic carbon metabolism in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana, Plant J., 2000, vol. 23, pp. 759–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Yang, G.D., Zhao, H.W., Tan, F.Z., Liu, X.Y., Yang, G.B., and He, C., A studies of sucrose metabolic enzymes in function leaves of different quality spring maizes, Heilongjiang Agric. Sci., 2006, vol. 5, pp. 14–16.Google Scholar
- 21.Islam, M.S., Matsui, T., and Yoshida, Y., Carbohydrate content and the activities of sucrose synthase, sucrose phosphate synthase and acid invertase in different tomato cultivars during fruit development, Sci. Hort., 1996, vol. 65, nos. 2–3, pp. 125–136.Google Scholar