Advertisement

Russian Journal of Plant Physiology

, Volume 66, Issue 1, pp 77–86 | Cite as

QTL Mapping of Diffuse Reflectance Indices of Leaves in Hexaploid Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

  • Yu. V. ChesnokovEmail author
  • E. V. Kanash
  • G. V. Mirskaya
  • N. V. Kocherina
  • D. V. Rusakov
  • U. Lohwasser
  • A. Börner
RESEARCH PAPERS
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

Quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping of diffuse reflectance indices of laminas in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) has been first performed under controlled conditions of a regulated agroecobiological testing ground in the presence or absence of nitrogen fertilizers. Indices chosen for the study determine a range of important characteristics, such as the content of chlorophylls and anthocyanins, carotenoid/chlorophyll ratio, photochemical activity of the photosynthetic apparatus, light scattering on a lamina, assimilating leaf surface area, and grain productivity. In total, 31 QTLs have been mapped. A significant correlation has been revealed between the introduction of a nitrogen fertilizer and the five of six optical characteristics of the photosynthetic apparatus activity in bread wheat. The only exception is the reflectance index for near-infrared radiation (800 nm), which depends on the structural features of leaf tissues. No statistically significant correlation has been revealed between the thousand-grain weight and spectral characteristics of the diffuse reflectance of the lamina measured at the booting stage. However, a significant correlation between the number of grains formed in the spike of the main stalk and the traits characterizing activity of the photosynthetic apparatus (reflectance indices, leaf area) has been observed. Results of the performed variance, correlation, and QTL analyses confirm each other indicating reliability of the revealed effect of nitrogen nutrition level on the manifestation of the studied reflectance indices in bread wheat under strictly controlled conditions of an agroecobiological testing ground. Application of noninvasive optical methods provides a high-throughput assessment of photosynthetic intensity in plants and, therefore, can be used for efficient selection of promising wheat genotypes with high grain productivity under both controlled and field conditions.

Keywords:

Triticum aestivum QTL mapping reflectance indices leaf area grain productivity controlled conditions of regulated agroecosystems 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The study was partially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 16-04-00311а).

COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. This article does not contain any studies involving animals or human participants performed by any of the authors.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Chesnokov, Yu.V., Molekulyarno-geneticheskie markery i ikh ispol’zovanie v predselektsionnykh issledovaniyakh (Molecular Genetic Markers and Their Use in Prebreeding Investigations), St. Petersburg: Agrophys. Res. Inst., 2013.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chesnokov, Yu.V., Mirskaya, G.V., Kanash, E.V., Kocherina, N.V., Lohwasser, U., and Börner, A., QTL mapping of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown under controlled conditions of an agroecobiological testing ground, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2017, vol. 64, pp. 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chesnokov, Yu.V., Mirskaya, G.V., Kanash, E.V., Kocherina, N.V., Rusakov, D.V., Lohwasser, U., and Börner, A., QTL identification and mapping in soft spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under controlled agroecological and biological testing area conditions with and without nitrogen fertilized, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2018, vol. 65, pp. 123–135.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S102144371801003X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Furbank, R.T. and Tester, M., Phenomics technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck, Trends Plant Sci., 2011, vol. 16, pp. 635–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Walter, A., Studer, B., and Kolliker, R., Advanced phenotyping offers opportunities for improved breeding of forage and turf species, Ann. Bot., 2012, vol. 110, pp. 1271–1279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kanash, E.V., Panova, G.G., and Blokhina, S.Yu., Optical criteria for assessment of efficiency and adaptogenic characteristics of biologically active preparations, Acta Hortic., 2013, vol. 1009, pp. 37–44.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Graeff, S., Steffens, D., and Schubert, S., Use of reflectance measurements for the early detection of N, P, Mg, and Fe deficiencies in Zea mays L., J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 2001, vol. 164, pp. 445–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yakushev, V., Kanash, E., Rusakov, D., and Blokhina, S., Specific and non-specific changes in optical characteristics of spring wheat leaves under nitrogen and water deficiency, Proc. 11th Eur. Conf. on Advances in Animal Biosciences: Precision Agriculture (ECPA), Edinburgh, July 16–20, 2017, The Animal Consortium, 2017, vol. 8, special issue 2, pp. 229–232.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S204047001700053X
  9. 9.
    Kanash, E.V. and Osipov, Yu.A., Optical signals of oxidative stress in crops physiological state diagnostics, Proc. 7th Eur. Conf. on Precision Agriculture, Wageningen, July 6–8, 2009, Wageningen: Academic, 2009, pp. 81–89.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reynolds, M. and Tuberosa, R., Translational research impacting on crop productivity in drought-prone environments, Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 2008, vol. 11, pp. 171–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sims, D.A. and Gamon, J.A., Relationships between leaf pigment content and spectral reflectance across a wide range of species, leaf structures and developmental stages, Remote Sens. Environ., 2002, vol. 81, pp. 337–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Peñuelas, J., Barret, F., and Fitella, I., Semi-empirical indices to assess carotenoids/chlorophyll a ratio from leaf spectral reflectance, Photosynthetica, 1995, vol. 31, pp. 221–230.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Merzlyak, M.N., Gitel’son, A.A., Chivkunova, O.B., Solovchenko, A.E., and Pogosyan, S.I., Application of reflectance spectroscopy for analysis of higher plant pigments, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2003, vol. 50, pp. 704–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haldane, J.B.S., The recombination of linkage values and the calculation of distance between the loci of linkage factors, J. Genet., 1919, vol. 8, pp. 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lander, E.S., Green, P., Abrahamson, J., Barlow, A., Daly, M.J., Lincoln, S.E., and Newburg, L., M-APMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations, Genomics, 1987, vol. 1, pp. 174–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ganal, M.W. and Röder, M.S., Microsattelite and SNP markers in wheat breeding, in Genomics Assisted Crop Improvement: Genomics Applications in Crops, Varshney, R.K. and Tuberosa, R., Eds., Springer, 2007, vol. 2, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kosambi, D.D., The estimation of map distances from recombination values, Ann. Eugen., 1944, vol. 12, pp. 172–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kocherina, N.V., Artemyeva, A.M., and Chesnokov, Yu.V., Use of LOD-score technology in mapping quantitative trait loci in plants, Russ. Agric. Sci., 2011, vol. 37, pp. 201–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lakin, G.F., Biometriya (Biometrics), Moscow: Vyssh. Shk., 1990.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Babar, M.A., Reynolds, M.P., van Ginkel, M., Klatt, A.R., Raun, W.R., and Stone, M.L., Spectral reflectance to estimate genetic variation for in-season biomass, leaf chlorophyll, and canopy temperature in wheat, Crop Sci., 2006, vol. 46, pp. 1046–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Peñuelas, J., Munné-Bosch, S., Llusià, J., and Filella, I., Leaf reflectance and photo- and antioxidant protection in field-grown summer-stressed Phillyrea angustifolia. Optical signals of oxidative stress? New Phytol., 2004, vol. 162, pp. 115–124.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01007.x
  22. 22.
    Gamon, J.A., Serrano, L., and Surfus, J.S., The photochemical reflectance index: an optical indicator of photosynthetic radiation use efficiency across species, functional types, and nutrient levels, Oecologia, 1997, vol. 112, pp. 492–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Evain, S., Flexas, J., and Moya, I., A new instrument for passive remote sensing. 2. Measurement of leaf and canopy reflectance changes at 531 nm and their relationship with photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence, Remote Sens. Environ., 2004, vol. 91, pp. 175–185.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.03.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gitelson, A.A., Gamon, J.A., and Solovchenko, A., Multiple drivers of seasonal change in PRI: implications for photosynthesis. 1. Leaf level, Remote Sens. Environ., 2017, vol. 191, pp. 110–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Grant, L., Diffuse and specular characteristics of leaf reflectance, Remote Sens. Environ., 1987, vol. 22, pp. 309–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Slaton, M.R., Hunt, E.R., and Smith, W.K., Estimating near-infrared leaf reflectance from structural characteristics, Am. J. Bot., 2001, vol. 88, pp. 278–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Leng, P., Itamura, H., Yamamura, H., and Deng, X.M., Anthocyanin accumulation in apple and peach shoots during cold acclimation, Sci. Hortic., 2000, vol. 83, pp. 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cobbina, J. and Miller, M.H., Purpling in maize hybrids as influenced by temperature and soil phosphorus, Agron. J., 1987, vol. 79, pp. 576–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nozzolillo, C., Isabelle, P., and Das, G., Seasonal changes in the phenolic constituents of jack pine seedling (Pinus banksiana), Can. J. Bot., 1990, vol. 68, pp. 2010–2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gould, K.S., McKelvie, J., and Markham, K.R., Do anthocyanins function as antioxidants in leaves? Imaging of H2O2 in red and green leaves after mechanical injury, Plant Cell Environ., 2002, vol. 25, pp. 1261–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu. V. Chesnokov
    • 1
    Email author
  • E. V. Kanash
    • 1
  • G. V. Mirskaya
    • 1
  • N. V. Kocherina
    • 1
  • D. V. Rusakov
    • 1
  • U. Lohwasser
    • 2
  • A. Börner
    • 2
  1. 1.Agrophysical Research InstituteSt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant ResearchGaterslebenGermany

Personalised recommendations