Russian Journal of Plant Physiology

, Volume 65, Issue 4, pp 532–540 | Cite as

Scale of Physiological Processes Sensitivity to PEG-Induced Water Stress in Scots Pine Seedlings

  • Yu. V. IvanovEmail author
  • I. E. Zlobin
  • A. V. Kartashov
  • P. P. Pashkovskiy
  • Vl. V. Kuznetsov
Research Papers


The idea that water deficit strengthening induces concerted changes of plant physiological parameters is rather widespread. However, such changes are often difficult to identify due to challenges in establishments and maintenance of required water stress intensities using solid substrates. Therefore, we exposed Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) seedlings to the range of water potentials from–0.15 to–1.5 MPa in PEG-water culture to identify the series of physiological parameters differently sensitive to water stress. We observed that even mild water stress (–0.15 MPa) inhibited root elongation, which could be one of the main pine seedlings vulnerabilities under drought. Active accumulation of osmolytes was already induced by mild water deficit and further increased with water stress severity. Plant fresh biomass growth sensitivity was more related to changes of relative water content (RWC) than to changes in tissue water content or dry weight accumulation. Plants were able to grow and accumulate dry weight down to–0.5 MPa, but lower medium water potentials (–1.0 and–1.5 MPa) suppressed growth and heavily damaged root cells, as judged from many-fold increase of Ca2+ content in roots. Chlorophyll a content was surprisingly sensitive to water stress, while carotenoids level was increased under severe stress conditions. In conclusion, the experimental system with stepwise water potential values allowed us to analyze the sensitivity scale of a range of P. sylvestris physiological processes to water stress. It was largely similar to those described earlier for other plant species, but its peculiarities were high sensitivity of root elongation, marked resistance of biomass growth to water deficit and well-developed ability to osmotic adjustment.


Pinus sylvestris drought polyethylene glycol 6000 osmotic pressure relative water content calcium content 


PEG 6000

polyethylene glycol 6000


relative water content


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Breshears, D.D., Myers, O.B., Meyer, C.W., Barnes, F.J., Zou, C.B., Allen, C.D., McDowell, N.G., and Pockman, W.T., Tree die-off in response to global change-type drought: mortality insights from a decade of plant water potential measurements, Front. Ecol. Environ., 2009, vol. 7, pp. 185–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lebourgeous, F., Rathgeber, C.B.K., and Ulrich, E., Sensitivity of French temperate coniferous forests to climate variability and extreme events (Abies alba, Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris), J. Veg. Sci., 2010, vol. 21, pp. 364–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Taeger, S., Zang, C., Liesebach, M., and Menzel, A., Impact of climate and drought events on the growth of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) provenances, Forest Ecol. Manag., 2013, vol. 307, pp. 30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arndt, S.K., Clifford, S.C., Wanek, W., Jones, H.G., and Popp, M., Physiological and morphological adaptations of the fruit tree Ziziphus rotundifolia in response to progressive drought stress, Tree Physiol., 2001, vol. 21, pp. 705–715.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ditmarová, L., Kurjak, D., Palmroth, S., Kmet’, J., and Strelcová, K., Physiological responses of Norway spruce (Picea abies) seedlings to drought stress, Tree Physiol., 2009, vol. 30, pp. 205–213.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sofo, A., Manfreda, S., Fiorentino, M., Dichio, B., and Xiloyannis, C., The olive tree: a paradigm for drought tolerance in Mediterranean climates, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 2008, vol. 12, pp. 293–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hacke, U.G., Sperry, J.S., Ewers, B.E., Ellsworth, D.S., Schäfer, K.V.R., and Oren, R., Influence of soil porosity on water use in Pinus taeda, Oecologia, 2000, vol. 124, pp. 495–505.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    López, R., Aranda, I., and Gill, L., Osmotic adjustment is a significant mechanism of drought resistance in Pinus pinaster and Pinus canariensis, Invest. Agrar., Sist. Recur. For., 2009, vol. 18, pp. 159–166.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kato, Y., Hirotsu, S., Nemoto, K., and Yamagishi, J., Identification of QTLs controlling rice drought tolerance at seedling stage in hydroponic culture, Euphytica, 2008, vol. 160, pp. 423–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ivanov, Y.V., Kartashov, A.V., Ivanova, A.I., Savochkin, Y.V., and Kuznetsov, Vl.V., Effects of copper deficiency and copper toxicity on organogenesis and some physiological and biochemical responses of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) seedlings grown in hydroculture, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2016, vol. 23, pp. 17332–17344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ivanov, Y.V., Savochkin, Y.V., and Kuznetsov, Vl.V., Scots pine as a model plant for studying the mechanisms of conifers adaptation to heavy metal action: 1. Effects of continuous zinc presence on morphometric and physiological characteristics of developing pine seedlings, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2011, vol. 58, pp. 871–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Michel, B.E. and Kaufmann, M.R., The osmotic potential of polyethylene glycol 6000, Plant Physiol., 1973, vol. 51, pp. 5914–5916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bréda, N., Huc, R., Granier, A., and Dreyer, E., Temperate forest trees and stands under severe drought: a review of ecophysiological responses, adaptation processes and long-term consequences, Ann. For. Sci., 2006, vol. 63, pp. 625–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Byun, H.-R. and Wilhite, D.A., Objective quantification of drought severity and duration, J. Climate, 1999, vol. 12, pp. 2747–2756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    González, L., and González-Vilar, M., Determination of relative water content, in Handbook of Plant Ecophysiology Techniques, Reigosa Roger, M.J., Ed., Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2001, pp. 207–212.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lichtenthaler, H., Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes, Methods Enzymol., 1987, vol. 148, pp. 350–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Padilla, F.M. and Pugnaire, F.I., Rooting depth and soil moisture control Mediterranean woody seedling survival during drought, Funct. Ecol., 2007, vol. 21, pp. 489–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hummel, I., Pantin, F., Sulpice, R., Piques, M., Rolland, G., Dauzat, M., Christophe, A., Pervent, M., Bouteillé, M., Stitt, M., Gibon, Y., and Muller, B., Arabidopsis plants acclimate to water deficit at low cost through changes of carbon usage: an integrated perspective using growth, metabolite, enzyme, and gene expression analysis, Plant Physiol., 2010, vol. 154, pp. 357–372.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Muller, B., Pantin, F., Génard, M., Turc, O., Freixes, S., Piques, M., and Gibbon, Y., Water deficits uncouple growth from photosynthesis, increase C content, and modify the relationships between C and growth in sink organs, J. Exp. Bot., 2011, vol. 62, pp. 1715–1729.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fan, S., Blake, T.J., and Blumwald, E., The relative contribution of elastic and osmotic adjustments to turgor maintenance of woody species, Physiol. Plant., 1994, vol. 90, pp. 408–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    DeEll, J.R. and Toivonen, P.M.A., Practical Applications of Chlorophyll Fluorescence in Plant Biology, New York: Springer Science+Business Media, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zayed, M.A. and Zeid, I.M., Effect of water and salt stresses on growth, chlorophyll, mineral ions and organic solutes contents, and enzymes activity in mung bean seedlings, Biol. Plant., 1997, vol. 40, pp. 351–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hsiao, T.C., Plant responses to water stress, Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol., 1973, vol. 24, pp. 519–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hsiao, T.C. and Xu, L.K., Sensitivity of growth of roots versus leaves to water stress: biophysical analysis and relation to water transport, J. Exp. Bot., 2000, vol. 51, pp. 1595–1616.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Marshall, J.G. and Dumbroff, E.B., Turgor regulation via cell wall adjustment in white spruce, Plant Physiol., 1999, vol. 119, pp. 313–319.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Martínez, J.P., Silva, H., Ledent, J.F., and Pinto, M., Effect of drought stress on the osmotic adjustment, cell wall elasticity and cell volume of six cultivars of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), Eur. J. Agron., 2007, vol. 26, pp. 30–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lichtenthaler, H.K., Biosynthesis, accumulation and emission of carotenoids, a-tocopherol, plastoquinone, and isoprene in leaves under high photosynthetic irradiance, Photosynth. Res., 2007, vol. 92, pp. 163–179.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Camejo, D., Rodríguez, P., Morales, M.A., Dell’Amico, J.M, Torrecillas, A., and Alarcón, J.J., High temperature effects on photosynthetic activity of two tomato cultivars with different heat susceptibility, J. Plant Physiol., 2005, vol. 162, pp. 281–289.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Martínez-Carrasco, R., Sánchez-Rodriguez, J., and Pérez, P., Changes in chlorophyll fluorescence during the course of photoperiod and in response to drought in Casuarina equisetifolia Forst. and Forst., Photosynthetica, 2002, vol. 40, pp. 363–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu. V. Ivanov
    • 1
    Email author
  • I. E. Zlobin
    • 1
  • A. V. Kartashov
    • 1
  • P. P. Pashkovskiy
    • 1
  • Vl. V. Kuznetsov
    • 1
  1. 1.Timiryazev Institute of Plant PhysiologyRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations