Russian Journal of Plant Physiology

, Volume 64, Issue 1, pp 109–115 | Cite as

Growth and physiological alterations in Niger cultivars under drought stress

  • S. G. GhaneEmail author
  • T. D. Nikam
Research Papers


Aim of the present study was to determine differential responses in growth and physiology of tolerant (cv. IGPN 2004) and sensitive (cv. GA 10) cultivars of Niger (Guizotia abyssinica Cass.) using in vitro grown calli under water deficit conditions. The calli were subjected to drought stress using PEG-8000 (–0.16,–0.45,–0.87,–1.42 bar) for 15 d and relative growth rate (RGR), percent tissue water content (% TWC), osmolytes (proline–Pro, glycine betaine—GB, total soluble sugars—TSS) accumulation, malondialehyde (MDA) content as well as antioxidant enzyme activities such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and catalase (CAT) were analysed. Our findings showed that RGR and percent TWC was decreased significantly with the intensity of drought stress in both cultivars, but the RGR reduction was least (five folds) in cv. IGPN 2004 than in cv. GA 10 (6.2 folds). In osmolyte accumulation such as Pro and GB, cv. IGPN 2004 was found superior (5.5 and ten folds higher, respectively) to tolerate drought stress than GA 10; however, no change was observed in TSS accumulation. Further, it was noted that cv. IGPN 2004 caused least oxidative damage to the membranes. It also exhibited better SOD, CAT and APX activities and had higher α-tocopherol content. The least reduction in growth and MDA content and higher osmolytes and antioxidant activities in cv. IGPN 2004 revealed more drought stress tolerance at cellular level. It was suggested that increased drought tolerance of cv. IGPN 2004 was coupled with its better maintenance of RGR, percent TWC, reduced lipid peroxidation, more accumulation of osmolytes and higher antioxidant enzymes.


Guizotia abyssinica oilseed polyethylene glycol relative growth rate MDA osmolytes antioxidants 



ascorbate peroxidase




callus induction medium


glycine betaine




relative growth rate


relative water content


superoxide dismutase


total soluble sugars


percent tissue water content


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Wang, W., Vinocur, B., and Altman, A., Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance, Planta, 2003, vol. 218, pp. 1–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhang, M., Chen, Q., and Shen, S., Physiological responses of two Jerusalem artichoke cultivars to drought stress induced by polyethylene glycol, Acta Physiol. Plant., 2011, vol. 33, pp. 313–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Basu, S., Roychoudhury, A., Saha, P.P., and Sengupta, D.N., Differential antioxidative responses of indica rice cultivars to drought stress, Plant Growth Regul., 2010, vol. 60, pp. 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lutts, S., Almansouri, M., and Kinet, J.M., Salinity and water stress have contrasting effects on the relationship between growth and cell viability during and after stress exposure in durum wheat callus, Plant Sci., 2004, vol. 167, pp. 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ramadan, M.F. and Mörsel, J.-T., Proximate neutral lipid composition of niger (Guizotia abyssinica Cass.), Czech J. Food Sci., 2002, vol. 20, pp. 98–104.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ghane, S.G., Lokhande, V.H., and Nikam, T.D., Differential growth, physiological and biochemical responses of Niger (Guizotia abyssinica Cass.) cultivars to water-deficit (drought) stress, Acta Physiol. Plant., 2012, vol. 34, pp. 215–225.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ghane, S.G., Lokhande, V.H., and Nikam, T.D., Growth, physiological, and biochemical responses in relation to salinity tolerance for in vitro selection in oil seed crop Guizotia abyssinica Cass., J. Crop Sci. Biotech., 2014, vol. 17, pp. 11–20.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rai, M.K., Kalia, R.K., Singh, R., Gangola, M.P., and Dhawan, A.K., Developing stress tolerant plants through in vitro selection–An overview of the recent progress, Environ. Exp. Bot., 2011, vol. 71, pp. 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Akcay, U.C., Ercan, O., Kavas, M., Yildiz, L., Yilmaz, C., Oktem, H.A., and Yucel, M., Droughtinduced oxidative damage and antioxidant responses in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) seedlings, Plant Growth Regul., 2010, vol. 61, pp. 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Panfili, G., Manzi, P., and Pizzoferrato, L., High-performance liquid chromatographic method for the simultaneous determination of tocopherols, carotenes, and retinol and its geometric isomers in Italian cheeses, Analyst, 1994, vol. 119, pp. 1161–1165.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sakthivelu, G., Devi, M.K., Giridhar, P., Rajasekaran, T., Ravishankar, G.A., Nedev, T., and Kosturkova, G., Drought-induced alterations in growth, osmotic potential and in vitro regeneration of soybean cultivars, Gen. Appl. Plant Physiol., 2008, vol. 34, pp. 103–112.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sorkheh, K., Shiran, B., Khodambshi, M., Rouhi, V., and Ercisli, S., In vitro assay of native Iranian almond species (Prunus L. spp.) for drought tolerance, Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult., 2011, vol. 105, pp. 395–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gopal, J. and Iwama, K., In vitro screening of potato against water-stress mediated through sorbitol and polyethylene glycol, Plant Cell Rep., 2007, vol. 26, pp. 693–700.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Biswas, J., Chowdhury, B., Bhattacharya, A., and Mandal, A.B., In vitro screening for increased drought tolerance in rice, In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol.: Plant, 2002, vol. 38, pp. 525–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hassan, N.M., Serag, M.S., and El-Feky, F.M., Changes in nitrogen content and protein profiles following in vitro selection of NaCl resistant mung bean and tomato, Acta Physiol. Plant., 2004, vol. 26, pp. 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Verslues, P.E., Ober, E.S., and Sharp, R.E., Root growth an oxygen relations at low water potentials. Impact of oxygen availability in polyethylene glycol solutions, Plant Physiol., 1998, vol. 116, pp. 1403–1412.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Watanabe, S., Kojima, K., Ide, Y., and Sasaki, S., Effects of saline and osmotic stress on proline and sugar accumulation in Populus euphratica in vitro, Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult., 2000, vol. 63, pp. 199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Errabii, T., Gandonou, C.B., Essalmani, H., Abrini, J., Idaomar, M., and Senhaji, N.S., Effect of NaCl and mannitol induced stress on sugarcane (Saccharum sp.) callus cultures, Acta Physiol. Plant., 2007, vol. 29, pp. 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bajji, M., Lutts, S., and Kinet, J.M., Physiological changes after exposure to and recovery from polyethylene glycol-induced water deficit in callus culture issued from durum wheat (Triticum durum) cultivars differing in drought resistance, J. Plant Physiol., 2000, vol. 156, pp. 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Newton, R.J., Sen, S., and Puryear, J.D., Free proline in water-stressed pine callus, Tappi J., 1987, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 141–144.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mohamed, M.F. and Tawfik, A.A., Breeding for drought resistance in common bean: in vitro assay for root osmotic potential, J. Crop Improv., 2008, vol. 22, pp. 209–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ahmad, M.S.A., Javed, F., and Ashraf, M., Isoosmotic effect of NaCl and PEG on growth, cations and free proline accumulation in callus tissue of two indica rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes, Plant Growth Regul., 2007, vol. 53, pp. 53–63.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yancey, P.H., Compatible and counteracting solutes, in Cellular and Molecular Physiology of Cell Volume Regulation, Strange, K., Ed., Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1994, pp. 81–109.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ashraf, M. and Foolad, M.R., Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance, Environ. Exp. Bot., 2007, vol. 59, pp. 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kaur, G. and Asthir, B., Proline: a key player in plant abiotic stress tolerance, Biol. Plant., 2015, vol. 59, pp. 609–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sairam, R.K. and Tyagi, A., Physiology and molecular biology of salinity stress tolerance in plants, Curr. Sci., 2004, vol. 86, pp. 407–421.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cárdenas-Avila, M.L., Verde-Star, J., and Maiti, R.K., Foroughbakhch-P, R., Gámez-González, R., Martínez-Lozano, S., Núñez-González, M.A., García Díaz, G., Hernández-Piñero, J.L., and Morales-Vallarta, M.R., Variability in accumulation of free proline on in vitro callus of four bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties exposed to salinity and induced moisture stress, Int. J. Exp. Bot., 2006, vol. 75, pp. 103–108.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Noctor, G. and Foyer, C.H., Ascorbate and glutathione. Keeping active oxygen under control, Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 1998, vol. 49, pp. 249–279.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Plant Physiology, Department of BotanyShivaji UniversityKolhapurIndia
  2. 2.Department of BotanySavitribai Phule Pune UniversityPuneIndia

Personalised recommendations