Advertisement

Russian Journal of Plant Physiology

, Volume 59, Issue 4, pp 443–450 | Cite as

Mikhail Khristoforovich Chailakhyan: The fate of the scientist under the sign of florigen

  • G. A. Romanov
Dedicated to the 110th Anniversary of Academician M.Kh. Chailachyan Birthday (1902–1991)

Abstract

The more significant is a discovery made by the scientist, the greater influence it exerts on the fate of its author. The theory of florigen, a hormone of flowering, put forward by M.Kh. Chailakhyan in 1936 initially was inconvenient for Soviet authorities and brought severe trials to the scientist. However, as distinct from many others, Chailakhyan did not deny his scientific beliefs but continued to defend them in spite of harassment and threats. Later, on the contrary, this theory promoted the worldwide fame of its creator, although during Chailakhyan lifetime florigen has not been definitely identified chemically. Chailakhyan was close to the establishing of florigen protein nature, but even his long life was not enough to identify this elusive substance.

Keywords

higher plants florigen flowering hormonal theory photoperiodism FT proteins 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Vakhmistrov, D.B. and Aksenova, N.P., Mikhail Khristoforovich Chailakhyan (1902–1991), Sov. Plant Physiol., 1992, vol. 39, pp. 127–128.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aksenova, N.P., Problems of Growth and Development in the Studies by M.Kh. Chailakhyan, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2002, vol. 49, pp. 434–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Milyaeva, E.L. and Romanov, G.A., Molecular Genetics Returns to Basic Postulates of the Florigen Theory, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2002, vol. 49, pp. 438–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aksenova, N.P., Milyaeva, E.L., and Romanov, G.A., Florigen Goes Molecular: Seventy Years of the Hormonal Theory of Flowering Regulation, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2006, vol. 53, pp. 401–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chailakhyan, M.Kh., The Age of Plants and the Photoperiodic Reaction, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1933, vol. 1, pp. 306–314.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chailakhyan, M.Kh., The Effect of Length of the Day on the Chlorophyll Apparatus of Plants, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1934, vol. 2, pp. 37–42.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chailakhyan, M.Kh., Light Control of Plant Life (Practical Use of Plant Photoperiodism), Tr. Lab. Fiziol. Bioch. Rast., 1934, vol. 1, pp. 149–184.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gardner, W.W. and Allard, H.A., Effect of the Relative Length of Day and Night and Other Factors of the Environment on Growth and Reproduction of Plants, J. Agric. Res., 1920, vol. 18, pp. 553–606.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gardner, W.W. and Allard, H.A., Localization of the Response in Plants to Relative Length of Day and Night, J. Agric. Res., 1925, vol. 31, pp. 555–566.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Knott, J.E., Further Localization of the Response in Plant Tissue to Relative Length of Day and Night, Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 1927, vol. 1926, pp. 67–70.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rasumov, V., On the Localization of Photoperiodical Stimulation, Bull. Appl. Bot. Genet. Plant Breed., 1931, vol. 27, pp. 249–282.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Knott, J.E., Effect of a Localized Photoperiod on Spinach, Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 1934, vol. 31, pp. 152–154.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tageeva, S.A., A Study of Photosynthesis in Connection with Photoperiodism, Bull. Appl. Bot. Genet. Plant Breed., 1931, vol. 27, pp. 197–247.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chailakhyan, M.Kh., On the Mechanism of Photoperiodic Reaction, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1936, vol. 1, pp. 89–93.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chailakhyan, M.Kh., On the Hormonal Theory of Plant Development, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1936, vol. 3, pp. 443–447.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chailakhyan, M.Kh., New Facts in Support of the Hormonal Theory of Plant Development, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1936, vol. 4, pp. 79–83.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grant, B., A Theory Blossoms, Scientist, 2009, vol. 23, p. 53.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chailakhyan, M.Kh., Gormonal’naya teoriya razvitiya rastenii (Hormonal Theory of Plant Development), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1937.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sachs, J., Stoff und Form der Pflanzenorgane, Arb. Bot. Inst. Würzburg, 1888, vol. 3, pp. 452–488.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Moshkov, B.S., Role of the Leaves in Plant Photoperiodic Response, Sotscial. Rastenievod., 1936, vol. 19, pp. 25–30.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moshkov, B.S., Photoperiodic Response of Leaves and a Possibility to Use It in Grafting, Sotscial. Rastenievod., 1936, vol. 19, pp. 107–126.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Psarev, G.M., Localization of the Photoperiodic Stimulus in Soyabean, Sov. Bot., 1936, no. 3, pp. 88–91.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Moshkov, B.S., Flowering of Short-Day Plants under Continuous Illumination Due to Grafting, Sotscial. Rastenievod., 1937, vol. 21, pp. 145–156.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chailakhyan, M.Kh., “Considerations” and Facts in Connection with Hormonal Theory of Development of Plants, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Biol., 1937, no. 3, pp. 1093–1112.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cholodny, N.G., Is There the Hormone of Flowering? Usp. Sovrem. Biol., 1938, vol. 8, pp. 503–515.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chailakhyan, M.Kh., On the Flowering Hormone, Usp. Sovrem. Biol., 1939, vol. 10, pp. 515–524.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Richter, Ya.A., Academician A.A. Richter — Professor of Saratovskii University, Izv. Sarat. Univ., 2009, vol. 9, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    About the Research in the Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology, Vestn. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1938, no. 7–8, pp. 55–61.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chailakhyan, M.Kh., Regulyatsiya tsveteniya vysshikh rastenii (Regulation of Higher Plant Flowering), Moscow: Nauka, 1988.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Razumov, V.I., Sreda i razvitie rastenii (Environment and Plant Development), Moscow-Leningrad: Sel’khoz. Gos. Izd., 1961.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Moshkov, B.S., Fotoperiodizm rastenii (Plants and Photoperiodism), Moscow-Leningrad: Sel’khoz. Gos. Izd., 1961.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bernier, G., Kinet, J.-M, and Sachs, R.M., The Physiology of Flowering, vol. 1, Initiation of Flowers, Boca Raton: CRC, 1981.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chailakhyan, M.Kh., Grigor’eva, N.Ya., and Lozhnikova, V.N., The Effects of Leaf Extracts from Flowering Nicotiana tabacum Plants on the Flowering of Chenopodium rubrum Seedlings and Plantlets, Sov. Plant Physiol., 1977, vol. 24, pp. 773–776.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chailakhyan, M.Kh., Lozhnikova, V., Seidlova, F., Krekule, J., Dudko, N., and Negretsky, V., Floral and Growth Responses in Chenopodium rubrum L. to an Extract from Flowering Nicotiana tabacum L., Planta, 1989, vol. 178, pp. 143–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chailakhyan, M.Kh., Yanina, L.I., Devedzhyan, A.G., and Lotova, G.N., Induction of Tuber Formation in Tuberiferous Plants at Interspecies and Intergeneric Grafting, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1980, vol. 252, pp. 1276–1280.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mikhail Khristoforovich Chailakhyan (materialy k biobibliografii uchenykh SSSR) (Mikhail Khristoforovich Chailakhyan. Materials to Biobibliography of USSR Scientists), Moscow: Nauka, Ser. Fiziol. Rast., 1980, no. 4.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Abe, M., Kobayashi, Y., Yamamoto, S., Daimon, Y., Yamaguchi, A., Ikeda, Y., Ichinoki, H., Notaguchi, M., Goto, K., and Araki, T., FD, a bZIP Protein Mediating Signals from the Floral Pathway Integrator FT at the Shoot Apex, Science, 2005, vol. 309, pp. 1052–1056.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wigge, P.A., Kim, M.C., Jaeger, K.E., Busch, W., Schmid, M., Lohmann, I.U., and Weigel, D., Integration of Spatial and Temporal Information during Floral Induction in Arabidopsis, Science, 2005, vol. 309, pp. 1056–1059.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Huang, T., Bohlenius, H., Eriksson, S., Parcy, F., and Nilsson, O., The mRNA of the Arabidopsis Gene FT Moves from Leaf to Shoot Apex and Induces Flowering, Science, 2005, vol. 309, pp. 1694–1696.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Corbesier, L., Vincent, C., Jang, S.H., Fornara, F., Fan, Q.Z., Searle, I., Giakountis, A., Farrona, S., Gissot, L., Turnbull, C., and Coupland, G., FT Protein Movement Contributes to Long-Distance Signaling in Floral Induction of Arabidopsis, Science, 2007, vol. 316, pp. 1030–1033.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tamaki, S., Matsuo, S., Wong, H.L., Yokoi, S., and Shimamoto, K., Hd3a Protein Is a Mobile Flowering Signal in Rice, Science, 2007, vol. 316, pp. 1033–1036.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Aksenova, N.P. and Konstantinova, T.N., It Turned out that Florigen Is the Protein, but Investigations Are in Progress, Bull. Russ. Soc. Plant Physiol., 2007, no. 16, pp. 85–86.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ayre, B.G., The Flowering Hormone — Florigen: A Protein Hormone, Plant Hormones, Biosynthesis, Signal Transduction, Action! Davies, P.J., Ed., New York: Springer Science and Business Media, 2010, pp. 539–548.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Milyaeva, E.L., Golyanovskaya, S.A., Aksenova, N.P., and Chailakhyan, M.Kh., Changes of Protein Composition in Leaves and Stem Apices of Bicolored Coneflower with Transition to Flowering, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR (Bot. Sciences), 1991, vol. 316, pp. 11–15.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Timiryazev Institute of Plant PhysiologyRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations