Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences

, Volume 85, Issue 2, pp 93–99 | Cite as

The legal system of the Russian federation amid international integration

  • Taliya Yarullovna KhabrievaEmail author
Science and Society


International integration affects many sides of societal life, including the development of national legal systems. This article analyzes the regularities and algorithms of the mutual effect of national legal systems, which lead to the formation of unique compositions of various legal traditions. Special attention is paid to the influence of international law on the development of the legislative systems of individual countries. The author proposes ways of overcoming contradictions and gaps in the legal regulation of the multidimensional system of integration associations with the participation of the Russian Federation and substantiates conceptual approaches to the formation of the legal framework of the Eurasian Economic Union and subsidiary support for the union’s development within the legislations of the member states.


Legal System Legal Tradition International Integration Legal Development Legislative Initiative 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. W. Chambers, The Common Law (Aegypan, 2007).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. E. George and R. Korobkin, Common Law Approach to Contracts (Aspen Casebooks, 2012).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yu. A. Tikhomirov, Comparative Jurisprudence (Norma, Moscow, 1996) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. D. Zor’kin, Law amid Global Changes (Norma, Moscow, 2013) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. Ya. Khabrieva, “A law-governed state: Challenges of time and tasks of constitutional justice,” in Constitutional Control: A Doctrine and Practice: Proc. Int. Conf. Dedicated to the 20th Anniversary of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation (St. Petersburg, October 28–29, 2011) (Norma, Moscow, 2012) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. F. Deiser, “The juristic person,” Univ. Pennsylvania Law Rev. Am. Law Register 57(3) (1998).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. Farrel, Habeas corpus in times of emergency: A historical and comparative view.
  8. 8.
    F. F. Martens, Contemporary International Law of Civilized Nations, 5th ed. (Tipographiya Ministerstva Putei Soobshcheniya, St. Petersburg, 1904), Vol. 1 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Ya. Kapustin, “Globalization and integration in the Asia-Pacific region: A legal approach,” in Globalization and Integration Processes in the Asia-Pacific Region: Legal and Economic Problems, Ed. by T. Ya. Khabrieva (IZiSP, Moscow, 2014) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Ya. Kapustin, International Organizations in the Globalizing World (RUDN, Moscow, 2010) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. I. Pivovar, Post-Soviet Space: Integration Alternatives: a Historical Essay (Aleteiya, St. Petersburg, 2009) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    T. Ya. Khabrieva, Contemporary Problems of Ethnic Self-Determination: A Comparative Legal Study (Kontrakt, Moscow, 2011) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    T. Ya. Khabrieva, National-Cultural Autonomy in the Russian Federation (Yustitsinform, Moscow, 2003) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    International Law and National Legislation (Eksmo, Moscow, 2008) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Corruption: The Nature, Manifestations, Opposition, Ed. by T. Ya. Khabrieva (Yurisprudentsiya, Moscow, 2012) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Oesch, Standards of Review in WTO Dispute Resolution (Oxford, 2004).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    V. Zor’kin, “The limit of acquiescence,” Rossiiskaya Gazeta, Oct. 29 (2010).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Statement of the heads of states of the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, the Russian Federation, and the Republic of Tajikistan on the establishment the Eurasian Economic Community of October 10, 2000. Cited January 28, 2015.
  19. 19.
    N. G. Doronina, V. Yu. Luk’yanova, N. G. Semilyutina, and O. I. Tiunov, International Legal Aspects of Implementing the Interest of the Russian Federation Relative to the Formation of the Common Economic Space (IZiSP, Moscow, 2012) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. E. Naryshkin and T. Ya. Khabrieva, “Toward new parliamentary dimension of Eurasian integration,” Zh. Ross. Prava, No. 8 (2012).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    T. N. Neshataeva, “Eurasian court: Back to the future,” Zakon, No. 9 (2012).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    T. Ya. Khabrieva, “Stages and main trends in the constitutionalization of contemporary Russian legislation,” Zh. Konstitutsionnogo Pravosudiya, No. 6 (2013).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Legislation and Comparative LawGovernment of the Russian FederationMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations