Advertisement

Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences

, Volume 84, Issue 2, pp 69–79 | Cite as

The economy of imposed underdevelopment

On the real causes of the RAS reform
  • Ruslan Soltanovich DzarasovEmail author
Science and Society

Abstract

The accelerated adoption of a draft law underpinning the reorganization of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) and the disregard for the demands of the scientific community to perform an expert analysis of the draft law, organize a broad public debate, and introduce significant amendments to the text have spurred the debate about the possible causes of such a tough, if not aggressive, attitude of the Russian authorities to the Academy in particular and to research in general. Personal ambitions and a new stage of wealth redistribution, as well as the reluctance of the state to maintain such a large scientific structure, have been cited among the possible causes of such an attitude. The author of this paper attempts to look beyond these issues. Specifically, he perceives the RAS reform as part of the establishment and development of peripheral capitalism in Russian society.

Keywords

Corporate Governance World Capitalism Modern Capitalism Russian Enterprise Soviet Time 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Russian Academy of Sciences: Chronicle of Protest: June–July 2013, 2nd ed. (Zhurnal Rossiiskii Reporter, Moscow, 2013) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. M. Polterovich, “RAS reform: Expert analysis. Part 1. RAS reform: Minobrnauki project,” Obshchestv. Nauki Sovremennost’, No. 1 (2014).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. M. Rogov, Shock Therapy and the “RAS Reform”: Realities of Russian Science (Institut SShA i Kanady RAN, Moscow, 2013) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. E. Mindeli, S. I. Chernykh, et al., Financing Research and Developments in Russia: Status, Problems, Prospects (Institut Problem Razvitiya Nauki RAN, Moscow, 2013) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. E. Mindeli, L. K. Pipiya, and V. E. Chistyakova, Trends in the Development of the Human Potential of Russian Science (Institut Problem Razvitiya Nauki RAN, Moscow, 2008) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. E. Fortov, Program of a Candidate to the Presidency of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAN, Moscow, 2013) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. E. Varshavskii, “Problems of science and its efficiency,” Vopr. Ekon., No. 1 (2011).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Frank, Dependent Accumulation and Underdevelopment (Macmillan Press, London, 1978).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. Hobsbawm, Industry and Empire (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middlesex, 1968).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. Williams, Capitalism and Slavery (Univ. of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, 1994).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Bagchi, Colonialism and Indian Economy (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2010).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Dowd, “A Comparative analysis of economic development in the American West and South,” J. Econ. Hist. 16, 558 (1956).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Bagchi, Perilous Passage: Mankind and the Global Ascendancy of Capital (Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland, 2008).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. Brenner, The Boom and the Bubble: The US and the World Economy (Verso, London, 2003).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    K. Ho, Liquidated: An Ethnography of Wall Street (Duke Univ. Press, Durham, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Blair, “Financial restructuring and the debate about corporate governance,” in The Deal Decade: What Takeovers and Leveraged Buyouts Mean for the Corporate Governance, Ed. by M. Blair (Brookings Institution, Washington, 1993).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    K. Birch and V. Mykhnenko, “Introduction,” in The Rise and Fall of Neoliberalism: The Collapse of an Economic Order?, Ed. by K. Birch and V. Mykhnenko (Zed Books, London, 2010).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    P. Dicken, Global Shift: Reshaping the Global Economic Map in the 21st Century (SAGE Publications, London, 2003).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. Blecker and A. Razami, “Developing Country Exports of Manufactures: Moving Up the Ladder to Escape the Fallacy of Composition?,” American University, Department of Economics, Working Paper 2006-06 (2006).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Frontiers of Commodity Chain Research, Ed. by J. Bair (Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, 2009).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    W. Milberg, “Shifting sources and uses of profits: Sustaining US financialization with global value chains,” CEPN/SCEPA Conference, University of Paris-13, Jan. 17–18 (2008). http://www.univ-paris13.fr/cepn/IMG/pdf/col-milberg.pdf Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    S. Amin, The Law of Worldwide Value (Monthly Review Press, New York, 2010).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    D. Harvey, The New Imperialism (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2003).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    R. Freeman, “What really ails Europe (and America): The doubling of the global workforce,” Globalist, Mar. 5 (2010). http://www.theglobalist.com/storyid.aspx?StoryId=4542 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    D. Rodrick, “Labour markets: The unexpected frontier of globalization,” Globalist, May 31 (2011).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    R. Pollin, “Global outsourcing and the US working class,” New Labor Forum 16, 122 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    C. Serfati, “Financial dimensions of transnational corporations, global value chain and technological innovation,” J. Innovation Econ. 2, 35 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    D. Lane, Elites and Classes in the Transformation of State Socialism (Transaction, New Brunswick, 2011).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    S. Pirani, Change in Putin’s Russia: Power, Money, and People (Pluto Press, London, 2010).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    J. Wedel, Collision and Collusion: The Strange Case of Western Aid to Eastern Europe (Palgrave, New York, 2001).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    P. Desai, Conversations on Russia: Reform from Yeltsin to Putin (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    S. Talbott, The Russia Hand: A Memoir of Presidential Diplomacy (Random House, New York, 2002).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    M. Chossudovsky, The Globalisation of Poverty: Impact of IMF and World Bank Reforms (Zed Books, London, 1997).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    S. Menshikov, The Anatomy of Russian Capitalism (Executive Intelligence Review News Service, Washington, 2007).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    R. S. Dzarasov and D. V. Novozhenov, Big Business and Capital Accumulation in Contemporary Russia (Editorial URSS, Moscow, 2009) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    R. I. Kapelyushnikov and N. V. Demina, “Property instability risks in Russian industry,” Preprint WP3/2011/01, Ser. WP3. Labor Market Problems (Vysshaya Shkola Ekonomiki, Moscow, 2011) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    E. V. Ustyuzhanina, S. G. Evsyukov, and A. G. Petrov, Status and Prospects for the Development of the Corporate Sector of the Russian Economy (TsEMI RAN, Moscow, 2010) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    D. V. Novozhenov, “Economic theory and reality: The effect of insider methods of income distribution on the effectiveness of Russian corporations’ investment decisions,” Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 15(2), 168 (2004).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    I. V. Rozmainskii and A. S. Skorobogatov, “Investment shortsightedness as an institutional limiter of economic growth in post-Soviet Russia,” Ekon. Nauk. Sovr. Ross., No. 4 (2006).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    R. S. Dzarasov, “Werewolves of Stalinism: Russia’s capitalists and their system,” Debatte: J. Contemporary Central Eastern Europe 19, 471 (2011).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    S. Pirani, “What makes Russian capitalism: A response to Ruslan Dzarasov,” Debatte: J. Contemporary Central Eastern Europe 19, 499 (2011).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    R. S. Dzarasov, “Insider rent makes Russian capitalism: A rejoinder to Simon Pirani,” Debatte: J. Contemporary Central Eastern Europe 19, 585 (2012).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    V. A. Demin, Offshore companies as a real threat to Russia’s economic security. http://www.pros-vet.su/articles/sec/offshore-articule2/
  44. 44.
    V. Aerni, C. de Juniac, B. Holley, and T. Nang, Tapping Human Assets to Sustain Growth. Global Wealth (Boston Consulting Group, Boston, 2007).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    D. B. Kuvalin and A. K. Moiseev, “Russian enterprises in spring 2012: No significant positive changes,” Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 23(6), 593 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    V. N. Borisov and O. V. Pochukaeva, “Innovative development of the engineering industry,” Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 24(1), 26 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    D. B. Kuvalin and A. K. Moiseev, “Russian companies in late 2012: Work under the conditions of significant economic uncertainty,” Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 24(3), 286 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.RAS Central Economics and Mathematics InstituteMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations