Thermophysics and Aeromechanics

, Volume 25, Issue 5, pp 789–792 | Cite as

Calculating pressure fields on the basis of PIV-measurements for supersonic flows

  • P. A. PolivanovEmail author
Brief Communication


The velocity fields obtained by PIV (Particle Image Velocimetry) in supersonic flows are not sufficient to determine the integral characteristics of the flow. Additional data, for example, on pressure can be obtained from the solution of the Navier−Stokes equations. For incompressible flows, the solution of these equations is not too complicated. However, for supersonic flows, the need to take into account the flow density and the increasing number of experimental errors make it more difficult. This paper proposes a new method for calculating density and pressure from PIV data on the basis of the continuity equation. This method is robust and easy to implement for compressible flows.

Key words

PIV calculation of pressure compressible flows shock wave 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    V.A. Vlasov, G.G. Gadzhimagomedov, V.M. Lutovinov, and D.S. Sboev, Aerodynamic loads measurements on an airfoil using piv system, TsAGI Science J., 2013, Vol. 44, No. 3, P. 355–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    I. Azijli, A. Sciacchitano, D. Ragni, A. Palha, and R.P. Dwight, A posteriori uncertainty quantification of PIVbased pressure data, Exp. Fluids, 2016, Vol. 57, Iss. 5, Art. 72, P. 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Vanierschot and E. Van den Bulck, Planar pressure field determination in the initial merging zone of an annular swirling jet based on stereo-PIV measurements, Sensor, 2008, Vol. 8, P. 7596–7608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P.L. Van Gent, D. Michaelis, B.W. Van Oudheusden, P.E. Weiss, R. de Kat, A. Laskari, Y.J. Jeon, L. David, D. Schanz, F. Huhn, S. Gesemann, M. Novara, C. McPhaden, N.J. Neeteson, D.E. Rival, J.F.G. Schneiders, and F.F.J. Schrijer, Comparative assessment of pressure field reconstructions from particle image velocimetry measurements and Lagrangian particle tracking, Exp. Fluids, 2017, Vol. 58, Iss. 4, Art 33, P. 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P.A. Polivanov, A.A. Sidorenko, and A.A. Maslov, Transition effect on shock wave/boundary layer interaction at M = 1.47, AIAA Paper, 2015, P. 2015–1974.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D.A. Bountin, Yu.V. Gromyko, A.A. Maslov, P.A. Polivanov, and A.A. Sidorenko, Effect of the surface roughness of blunt cone forebody on the position of laminar-turbulent transition, Thermophysics and Aeromechanics, 2016, Vol. 23, No.5, P. 629–638.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P.A. Polivanov, Yu.V. Gromyko, D.A. Bountin, A.A. Maslov, and A.A. Sidorenko, The use of wavelet transform for the correlation analysis of boundary-layer pulsations, Thermophysics and Aeromechanics, 2017, Vol. 24, No. 6, P. 941–944.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kutateladze Institute of Thermophysics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Khristianovich Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics SB RASNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations