Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 364–380

The terminal Permian in European Russia: Vyaznikovian Horizon, Nedubrovo Member, and Permian–Triassic boundary

  • V. R. Lozovsky
  • Yu. P. Balabanov
  • E. V. Karasev
  • I. V. Novikov
  • A. G. Ponomarenko
  • O. P. Yaroshenko
Article

Abstract

The comprehensive analysis of the data obtained on terrestrial vertebrata, ostracods, entomologic fauna, megaflora, and microflora in deposits of the Vyaznikovian Horizon and Nedubrovo Member, as well as the paleomagnetic data measured in enclosing rocks, confirms heterogeneity of these deposits. Accordingly, it is necessary to distinguish these two stratons in the terminal Permian of the East European Platform. The combined sequence of Triassic–Permian boundary deposits in the Moscow Syneclise, which is considered to be the most complete sequence in the East European Platform, is as follows (from bottom upward): Vyatkian deposits; Vyaznikovian Horizon, including Sokovka and Zhukovo members; Nedubrovo Member (Upper Permian); Astashikha and Ryabi members of the Vokhmian Horizon (Lower Triassic). None of the sequences of Permian–Triassic boundary deposits known in the area of study characterizes this sequence in full volume. In the north, the Triassic deposits are underlain by the Nedubrovo Member; in the south (the Klyazma River basin), the sections are underlain by the Vyaznikovian Horizon. The Permian–Triassic boundary adopted in the General Stratigraphic Scale of Russia for continental deposits of the East European platform (the lower boundary of the Astashikha Member) is more ancient than the one adopted in the International Stratigraphic Chart. The same geological situation is observed in the German Basin and other localities where Triassic continental deposits are developed. The ways of solving this problem are discussed in this article.

Keywords

Permian Triassic entomofauna terrestrial vertebrata ostracods macroflora miospore com- plexes petromagnetism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Afonin, S.A., A palynological assemblage from the transitional Permian–Triassic deposits of European Russia, Paleontol. J., 2001, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 29–34.Google Scholar
  2. Afonin, S.A., Barinova, S.S., and Krassilov, V.A., A bloom of Tympanicysta Balme (green algae of zygnematalean affinities) at the Permian–Triassic boundary, Geodiversitas, 2001, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 481–487.Google Scholar
  3. Afonin, S.A., Nedubrovian palynological assemblage from Permian–Triassic boundary deposits of the Moscow syneclise, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, 2003.Google Scholar
  4. Afonin, S.A., Latest Permian palynological assemblage from Vyazniki,European Russia: stratigraphic and palaeoecological significance in relation to the Permo–Triassic boundary, in The Nonmarine Permian. N. M. Mus. Nat. Hist. Sci. Bull., 2005, no. 30, pp. 5–8.Google Scholar
  5. Alberti, F. von, Beitrag zu einer Monographie des Bunten Sandsteins, Muschelkalks und Keupers: und Keupers und die Verbindung Dieser Gebilde zu Einer Formation, J. G. Cotta’schen Buchhandlung, 1834.Google Scholar
  6. Arefiev, M.P., Kuleshov, V., and Pokrovskii, B.G., Carbon and oxygen isotope composition in upper Permian-lower Triassic terrestrial carbonates of the east European platform: a global ecological crisis against the background of an unstable climate, Dokl. Earth Sci., 2015, vol. 460, no. 1, pp. 11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arefiev, M.P. and Yaroshenko, O.P., Palynological characteristics of Upper Permian (Vyaznikovian) deposits of the northeastern side of the Moscow syneclise, in Paleostrat2015. Godichn. sobranie (nauch. konf.) sektsii Paleontol. MOIP i Mosk. otdel. Paleontol. obshch., Moskva, 27–29 yanvarya 2014 g. (Proc. Ann. Meet. (Sci. Conf.) Paleontol. Sect. Moscow Soc. Nat. Sci. and Moscow Branch Paleontol. Soc. “Paleostrat-2015”, Moscow, January 27–29, 2014), Moscow, 2015, pp. 12–13.Google Scholar
  8. Arefiev, M.P., Golubev, V.K., Balabanov, Y.P., et al., Type and reference sections of the Permian–Triassic continental sequences of the East European Platform: main isotope, magnetic, and biotic events, in Proc. XVIII Int. Congr. on Carboniferous and Permian (August 4–10, 2015). Sukhona and Severnaya Dvina Rivers Field Trip, Moscow: Paleontol. Inst. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2015.Google Scholar
  9. Aristov, D.S., New Grylloblattids (Insecta: Grylloblattida) from the Triassic of Eastern Europe, Eastern Kazakhstan and Mongolia, Paleontol. J., 2005, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 173–177.Google Scholar
  10. Aristov, D.S., New and little known Blattogryllidae (Insecta: Grylloblattida) from the Permian and Triassic of Russia, Kazakhstan, and Kyrgyzstan, Paleontol. J., 2011, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Aristov, D.S., New Grylloblattida (Insecta) from the Upper Permian and Lower Triassic of European Russia and Kazakhstan, Paleontol. J., 2013, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 66–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Aristov, D.S., Bashkuev, A.S., Golubev, V.K., et al., Fossil insects of the middle and upper Permian of European Russia, Paleontol. J., 2013, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 641–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bashkuev, A.S., Nedubroviidae, a new family of Mecoptera, Zootaxa, 2011, no. 2895, pp. 47–57.Google Scholar
  14. Benton, M.J., Tverdokhlebov, V.P., and Surkov, M.V., Ecosystem remodelling among vertebrates at the Permian–Triassic boundary in Russia, Nature, 2004, vol. 432, no. 7013, pp. 97–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Blom, G.I., Katalog mestonakhozhdenii faunisticheskikh ostatkov v nizhnetriasovykh otlozheniyakh Srednego Povolzh’ya i Prikam’ya (The Catalogue of Localities of Faunistic Remnants from Lower Triassic Deposits of the Middle Volga Region and the Kama Region), Kazan: Kazan. Gos. Univ., 1968 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  16. Botha, J. and Smith, R.M., Lystrosaurus species composition across the Permo–Triassic boundary in the Karoo Basin of South Africa, Lethaia, 2007, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dobruskina, I.A., Triasovye flory Evrazii (Triassic Floras of Eurasia), Moscow: Nauka, 1982 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  18. Golubev, V.K., Sennikov, A.G., and Naugolnykh, S.V., New data on geology and paleontology of Permian deposits in area on the village of Vyazniki (Vladimir oblast), in Paleostrat-2005. Godichn.sobr. sekt. Paleontol. MOIP i Mosk. otdeleniya Paleontol. obshch., Moskva, 14–15 fevralya 2005 g. (Proc. Ann. Meet. Paleontol. Sect. Moscow Soc. Nat. Sci. and Moscow Branch Paleontol. Soc. “Paleostrat-2005”, Moscow, February 14–15, 2005), Moscow: Paleontol. Inst. RAN, 2005, pp. 14–15.Google Scholar
  19. Golubev, V.K., Minikh, A.V., Balabanov, Yu.P., et al., The Permian-Triassic reference section in the Zhukov ravine and the area of the town of Gorokhovets, Vladimir oblast, Byull. Regional. Mezhved. Stratigr. Kom. po Tsentru i Yugu Russkoi Platformy, 2012, no. 5, pp. 49–82.Google Scholar
  20. Golubev, V.K. and Sennikov, A.G., Lithostratigraphy of Permian-Triassic continental deposits in the Vladimir oblast, in Paleostrat-2015. Godichn. Sobr.(nauchn. konf.) sektsii Paleontol. MOIP i Mosk. otdeleniya Paleontol. obshch., Moskva, 26–28 yanvarya 2015 g. Tez. dokl. (Proc. Ann. Meet. (Sci. Conf.) Paleontol. Sect. Moscow Soc. Nat. Sci. and Moscow Branch Paleontol. Soc. “Paleostrat-2015”, Moscow, January 27–29, 2014), Moscow, 2015, pp. 27–28.Google Scholar
  21. Gomankov, A.V. and Meien, S.V., Tatarinovaya flora (sostav i rasprostranenie v pozdnei permi Evrazii) (Tatarian Flora in Late Permian Deposits of the Eurasia: Composition and Distribution), Moscow: Nauka, 1986 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  22. Gomankov, A.V., Pant remnants. Spores and pollen, in Tatarskie otlozheniya reki Sukhony (Tatarian Deposits in the Sukhona River Basin), Saratov: Nauchn. Kn., 2001, pp. 120–128.Google Scholar
  23. Gomankov, A.V., Flora and stratigraphy of the Tatarian Stage in the East European Platform, Extended Abstract of Doctoral (Geol.-Mineral,) Dissertation, Moscow, 2002.Google Scholar
  24. Granitsa permi i triasa v kontinental’nykh seriyakh Vostochnoi Evropy (Materialy k Mezhd. simp. “Verkhnepermskie stratotipy Povolzh’ya”) (“The Permian-Triassic Boundary in Continental Series of East Europe” (Proc. Int. Symp. “Upper Permian Stratotypes of the Volga River Region”), Moscow: GEOS, 1998 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  25. Hermann, E., Hochuli, P.A., Bucher, H., et al., A close-up view of the Permian–Triassic boundary based on expanded organic carbon isotope records from Norway (Trøndelag and Fnnmark Platform), Global Planet. Change, 2010, vol. 74, nos. 3–4, pp. 156–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hermann, E., Hochuli, P.A., Bucher, H., and Roohi, G., Uppermost Permian to Middle Triassic palynology of the Salt Range and Surghar Range, Pakistan, Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol., 2012, vol. 169, pp. 61–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hochuli, P.A., Vigran, J.O., Hermann, E., and Bucher, H., Multiple climatic changes around the Permian–Triassic boundary event revealed by an expanded palynological record from mid-Norway, Geology, 2010, vol. 122, nos. 5–6, pp. 884–896.Google Scholar
  28. Ignatiev, V.I., Tatarskii yarus tsentral’nykh i vostochnykh oblastei Russkoi platformy. Chast’ 1. Stratigrafiya (The Tatarian of the Central and Eastern Areas of the Russian Platform. Pt. 1: Stratigraphy), Kazan: Kazan. Gos. Univ., 1962 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  29. Ivakhnenko, M.F., Golubev, V.K., Gubin, Yu.M., et al., Permskie i triasovye tetrapody Vostochnoi Evropy (Permian and Triassic Tetrapods in Eastern Europe), Moscow: GEOS, 1997 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  30. Ivakhnenko, M.F., Tetrapods of the East European Placket, a Late Paleozoic territorial natural complex,, in Tr. Paleontol. Inst. RAN (Proc. Paleontol. Inst. Ross. Acad. Sci.), 2001, vol. 238, pp. 1–200.Google Scholar
  31. Kalandadze, N.N., The first discovery of Lystrosaurus in the European regions of the USSR, Paleontol. Zh., 1975, no. 4, pp. 140–142.Google Scholar
  32. Karasev, E.V. and Krassilov, V.A., Late Permian phylloclades of the new genus Permophyllocladus and problems of the evolutionary morphology of peltasperms, Paleontol. J., 2007, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 198–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Karasev, E.V., New genus Navipelta (Peltaspermales, Pteridospermae) from Permian–Triassic boundary of Moscow Sineclise, Russia, Paleontol. J., 2009, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 1262–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Karasev, E.V. and Turnau, E., Early Triassic (Induan) megaspore assemblage from the marly clay of the Sholga locality, Kirov region, Russia, in Proc. 9th European Palaeobot.–Palynol. Conf., Padova: Coop. Libraria Editrice Univ. Padova, 2014.Google Scholar
  35. Karasev, E.V., The change of paleofloristic assemblages in the transitional stratigraphic interval at the Permian-Triassic boundary in the Moscow syneclise, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, 2009.Google Scholar
  36. Karaulov, V.B. and Lozovsky, V.R., Different approaches to the General stratigraphic Scale, Stratigr. Geol. Correl., 2002, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 531–546.Google Scholar
  37. Korte, C. and Kozur, H.W., Carbon-isotope stratigraphy across the Permian–Triassic boundary: a review, J. Asian Earth Sci., 2010, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 215–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kozur, H.W. and Bachmann, G.H., Correlation of the Germanic Triassic with the international scale, Albertiana, 2005, vol. 32, pp. 21–35.Google Scholar
  39. Krassilov, V.A., Afonin, S.A., and Barinova, S.S., Tympanicysta and the Terminal Permian events, Permophiles, 1999a, vol. 35, pp. 16–17.Google Scholar
  40. Krassilov, V.A., Afonin, S.A., and Lozovsky, V.R., Floristic evidence of transitional Permian–Triassic deposits of the Volga–Dvina region, Permophiles, 1999b, no. 34, pp. 12–14.Google Scholar
  41. Krassilov, V.A. and Karasev, E.V., First evidence of plant–arthropod interaction at the Permian–Triassic boundary in the Volga Basin, European Russia, Alavesia, 2008, no. 2, pp. 247–252.Google Scholar
  42. Krassilov, V.A. and Karasev, E.V., Paleofloristic evidence of climate change near and beyond the Permian–Triassic boundary, Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol., 2009, vol. 284, nos. 3–4, pp. 326–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kukhtinov, D.A., Lozovsky, V.R., Afonin, S.A., and Voronkova, E.A., Non-marine ostracods of the Permian–Triassic transition from sections of the East European Platform, Boll. Soc. Geol. It. (Ital. J. Geosci.), 2008, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 717–726.Google Scholar
  44. Kurkin, A.A., New Late Permian dicynodonts from the Vyazniki Assemblage of terrestrial tetrapods of Eastern Europe, Paleontol. J., 2001, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 53–59.Google Scholar
  45. Kustatscher, E., Bauer, K., Butzmann, R., et al., Sphenophytes, pteridosperms and possible cycads from the Wuchiapingian (Lopingian, Permian) of Bletterbach (Dolomites, Northern Italy), Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol., 2014, vol. 208, pp. 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lin, Q.-B., Nel, A., and Huang, D.-Y., The first agetopanorpine mecopteroid insect from Middle Permian of China (Insecta: Mecoptera: Permochoristidae), Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr. (N. S.), 2010, vol. 46, nos. 1–2, pp. 62–66.Google Scholar
  47. Lozovsky, V.R., The age of Lystrosaurus Beds in the Moscow Syneclise, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1983, vol. 272, no. 6, pp. 1433–1437.Google Scholar
  48. Lozovsky, V.R. and Zharkov, I.Ya., Reference sections of Permian–Triassic boundary continental deposits in East Europe. The Volga River basin, in Granitsa permi i triasa v kontinental’nykh seriyakh Vostochnoi Evropy (Materialy k Mezhdunarodnomu simpoziumu “Verkhnepermskie stratotipy Povolzh’ya”) (“The Permian–Triassic Boundary in Continental sections of East Europe” (Proc. Int. Symp. “Upper Permian Stratotypes of the Volga River Region”), Moscow, 1998, pp. 13–19.Google Scholar
  49. Lozovsky, V.R. and Blom, G.I., The Vetluga River basin, in Granitsa permi i triasa v kontinental’nykh seriyakh Vostochnoi Evropy (Mater. Mezhd. simp. “Verkhnepermskie stratotipy Povolzh’ya”) (“The Permian–Triassic Boundary in Continental sections of East Europe” (Proc. Int. Symp. “Upper Permian Stratotypes of the Volga River Region”), Moscow, 1998, pp. 7–13.Google Scholar
  50. Lozovsky, V.R., Krassilov, V.A., Afonin, S.A., et al., On distinguishing a new member within the Lower Triassic Vokhminian Formation of the Moscow syneclise, Byull. Regional. Mezhved. Stratigr. Kom. po Tsentru i Yugu Russkoi Platformy, 2001a, no. 3, pp. 151–163.Google Scholar
  51. Lozovsky, V.R., Afonin, S.A., and Eroshchev-Shak, V., On ash horizons and products of ash alteration in the Lower Triassic of Moscow syneclise, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Geol. Razved., 2001b, vol. 3, pp. 19–28.Google Scholar
  52. Lozovsky, V.R. and Kukhtinov, D.A., Vyaznikovian Stagethe youngest subdivision of Upper Permian in European Russia, Byull. Mosk. O–va Ispyt. Prir., Otd. Biol., 2007, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 17–26.Google Scholar
  53. Lozovsky, V.R., Correlation of Triassic deposits of East European and German basins and the problem of the Permian–Triassic boundary, in Mater. V Mezhd. konf., posvyashchennoi 150-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya V. P. Amalitskogo (1860–1917), Moskva, 22–23 noyabrya 2010 g. “Paleontologiya i stratigrafiya permi i triasa Severnoi Evrazii” (Proc. V Int. Conf. Devoted to the 150th Anniversary of V.P. Amalitsky (1860–1917) “Permian and Triassic Paleontology and Stratigraphy of North Eurasia”, Moscow, November 22–23, 2010), Moscow: Paleontol. Inst. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2010, pp. 86–87.Google Scholar
  54. Lozovsky, V.R., On different approaches to stratotypes for marine and continental deposits (exemplified by deposits around Vyazniki), in Pozvonochnye paleozoya i mezozoya Evrazii: evolyutsiya, smena soobshchestv, tafonomiya i paleogeografiya. Mater. Konf., posvyashchennoi 80-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya V. G. Ocheva (1931–2004), Moskva, 6 dekabrya 2011 g (Proc. Conf. Devoted to the 80th Anniversary of V.G. Ochev (1931–2004) “Vertebrates of Paleozoic and Mesozoic of Eurasia: evolution, changes of associations, taphonomy and paleobiogeography,” Moscow, December 6, 2011), Moscow: Paleontol. Inst. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2011, pp. 23–26.Google Scholar
  55. Lozovsky, V.R., Permo-Triassic crisis and its main causes, Byull. Mosk. O–va Ispyt. Prir., Otd. Geol., 2013, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 49–58.Google Scholar
  56. Lozovsky, V.R., Balabanov, Yu.P., Ponomarenko, A.G., et al., Stratigraphy, paleomagnetism, and petromagnetism of Lower Triassic in Moscow Syneclise. Pt. 1. Yug river basin, Byull. Mosk. O–va Ispyt. Prir., Otd. Geol., 2014, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 62–72.Google Scholar
  57. Lozovsky, V.R., Balabanov, Yu.P., Novikov, I.V., et al., Stratigraphy, paleomagnetism, and petromagnetism of Lower Triassic in Moscow Syneclise. Pt. 2. Vetluga and Unzha river basins, Byull. Mosk. O–va Ispyt. Prir., Otd. Geol., 2015, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 27–43.Google Scholar
  58. Lozovsky, V.R. and Korchagin, O.A., The Permian period ended with the impact of a “Siberia” comet on Earth, in The Carboniferous–Permian Transition. N. M. Mus. Nat. Hist. Sci. Bull., 2013, no. 60, pp. 224–229.Google Scholar
  59. Lucas, S.G., Dicynodon (Reptilia: Therapsida) from the Upper Permian of Russia: biochronologic significance, The Nonmarine Permian. N. M. Mus. Nat. Hist. Sci. Bull., 2005, no. 30, pp. 192–196.Google Scholar
  60. Marcinkiewicz, T., Fialkowska-Mader, A., and Pekowski, G., Megaspore zones of the epicontinental Triassic and Jurassic in Poland—overview, Biuletyn Pa stwowego Instytutu Geologicznego, 2014, vol. 457, pp. 15–42.Google Scholar
  61. Meyen, S.V., Evolyutsiya i sistematika vysshikh rastenii po dannym paleobotaniki (Evolution and Systematics of High Plants Based on the Paleobotanical Data), Moscow: Nauka, 1992 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  62. Metcalfe, I., Foster, C.B., Afonin, S.A., et al., Stratigraphy, biostratigraphy and C-isotopes of the Permian–Triassic non-marine sequence at Dalongkou and Lucaogou, Xinjiang Province, China, J. Asian Earth Sci., 2009, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 503–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mishina, E.M., Detailed Stratigraphy of lower Triassic deposits of the Vetluga series based on ostracods, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Geol., 1966, vol. 12, pp. 85–95.Google Scholar
  64. Mojsisovics, E., Waagen, W., and Diener, C., Entwurf einer Gliederung der pelagischen sedimente des Trias-Systems, in Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften Wien, 1895, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 1271–1302.Google Scholar
  65. Molostovskaya, I.I., About the Permian-Triassic boundary in the Zhukov ravine section, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Geol. Razved., 2010, no. 3, pp. 10–14.Google Scholar
  66. Murav’ev, F.A. and Balabanov, Yu.P., Lithological-mineralogical and paleomagnetic characteristics of the Permian–Triassic boundary deposits in the central part of the Moscow syneclise, in Mater. Vtoroi Vseross. konf., posvyashchennoi 175-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya N.A. Golovkinskogo “Verkhnii paleozoi Rossii: stratigrafiya i fatsial’nyi analiz”, Kazan, 27–30 sentyabrya 2009 g. (Proc. 2nd All-Russ. Conf. Devoted to the 175th Anniversary of N.A. Golovkinskii “ The Upper Paleozoic in Russia: Stratigraphy and Facies Analysis”, Kazan, September 27–30, 2009), Kazan: Kazan. Gos. Inst., 2009, pp. 198–199.Google Scholar
  67. Naugolnykh, S.V., Upper Permian flora of Vjazniki (European part of Russia), its Zechstein appearance, and the nature of the Permian/Triassic extinction, The Nonmarine Permian. N. M. Mus. Nat. Hist. Sci. Bull., 2005, vol. 30, no. 30, pp. 226–242.Google Scholar
  68. Naugolnykh, S.V., The Vyaznikovian flora and the reason of Permian-Triassic extinction, in Prichinno-sledstvennye svyazi i faktory global’nykh biosfernykh perestroek v fanerozoe (Causal-Consequentional Connections of the Phanerozoic Biospheric Reorganizations), Moscow: GEOS, 2006, pp. 83–89.Google Scholar
  69. Naugolnykh, S.V., Vetlugospermum and Vetlugospermaceae: a new genus and family of peltasperms from the Lower Triassic of Moscow: Syneclise (Russia), Geobios, 2012, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 451–462.Google Scholar
  70. Newell, A.J., Sennikov, A.G., Benton, M.J., et al., Disruption of playa-lacustrine depositional systems at the Permo–Triassic boundary, J. Geol. Soc., 2010, vol. 167, no. 4, pp. 695–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Novokshonov, V., Sukacheva, I., and Aristov, D.S., An Early Triassic Scorpionfly (Panorpida = Mecoptera) of the Vologda Region, Paleontol. J., 2004, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 214–215.Google Scholar
  72. Ochev, V.G., On the second find of Anomodoni remains in the Lower Triassic of European USSR, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Geol. Razved., 1992, no. 2, pp. 132–133.Google Scholar
  73. Ochev, V.G. and Shishkin, M.A., A shift in the continental biota at the Paleozoic–Mesozoic boundary of Eastern Europe: 4.1. Communities of terrestrial vertebrates, in Mater. Mezhd. simp. “Verkhnepermskie stratotipy Povolzh’ya”(“Granitsa permi i triasa v kontinental’nykh seriyakh Vostochnoi Evropy”) (“The Permian–Triassic Boundary in the Continental Series of Eastern Europe” (Proc. Int. Symp. “Upper Permian Stratotypes of the Volga Region”), Moscow, 1998, pp. 59–74.Google Scholar
  74. Oleinikov, A.N. and Gavrilova, V.A., Triassic system, in Sostoyanie izuchennosti stratigrafii dokembriya i fanerozoya Rossii. Zadachi dal’neishikh issled. Postanovleniya Mezhved. stratigr. komiteta i ego postoyannykh komissii. Vyp. 38 (Resolutions of the Interdepartmental Stratigraphic Committee and Its Permanent Stratigraphic Commissions on Precambrian and Phanerozoic of Russia. Future Research Issues), St. Petersburg: Vseross. Nauchno-Issled. Geol. Inst. 2008, vol. 38, pp. 77–85.Google Scholar
  75. Olson, E.C., Problems of Permo–Triassic terrestrial vertebrate extinctions, Hist. Biol., 1989, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ponomarenko, A.G., The first Beetles (Permosynidae, Coleoptera) from the Upper Tatarian of European Russia, Paleontol. J., 2003, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 170–173.Google Scholar
  77. Ponomarenko, A.G., New beetles (Insecta, Coleoptera) from Vyazniki locality, terminal Permian of European Russia, Paleontol. J., 2011, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 414–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Ponomapenko, A.G., New beetles (Insecta, Coleoptera) from the Nedubrovo locality, terminal Permian or basal Triassic of European Russia, Paleontol. J., 2015, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rasnitsyn, A.P., Aristov, D.S., and Rasnitsyn, D.A., Insects at the boundary of the Permian and an Early Triassic (Urzhumian–Olenekian ages) and the problem of the Permo–Triassic crisis in biodiversity, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 2013, vol. 74, pp. 43–65.Google Scholar
  80. Remane, J., Bassett, M.G., Cowie, J.W., et al., Guidelines for establishment of global chronostratigraphic standards by International Commission on Stratigrahphy (ISC), Permophiles, 1996, vol. 29, pp. 25–30.Google Scholar
  81. Reshenie Mezhved. regional. stratigr. Soveshch. posrednemu i verkhnemu paleozoyu Russkoi platformy s regional. stratigr. skhemami, Leningrad, 1988 g. (Resolutions of the Interdepartmental Meeting on Elaboration of Unified Stratigraphic Schemes for the Middel and Upper Paleozoic of the Russian Platform with Regional Stratigraphic Schemes), Leningrad: Vseross. Nauchno-Issled. Geol. Inst., 1990 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  82. Retallack, G.J., Smith, R.M., and Ward, P.D., Vertebrate extinction across Permian–Triassic boundary in Karoo Basin, South Africa, Geology, 2003, vol. 115, no. 9, pp. 1133–1152.Google Scholar
  83. Rodendorf, B.B., The order Coleoptera: Coleopterans or Beetles, in Paleozoiskie nasekomye Kuznetskogo basseina (Paleozoic Insects of the Kuznetsk Basin), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1961, pp. 393–469.Google Scholar
  84. Schneebeli-Hermann, E., Kürschner, W.M., Hochuli, P.A., et al., Evidence for atmospheric carbon injection during the end-Permian extinction, Geology, 2013, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 579–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Schneebeli-Hermann, E., Kürschner, W.M., Kerp, H., et al., Vegetation history across the Permian–Triassic boundary in Pakistan (Amb section, Salt Range), Gondwana Res., 2015, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 911–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Selezneva, A.A. and Lozovskii, V.R., The first find of Perleididae in the Lower Triassic of the East European Platform, Paleontol. Zh., 1986, no. 2, pp. 113–116.Google Scholar
  87. Sennikov, A.G. and Golubev, V.K., Late Permian epoch: a flood plain, in Geol. istoriya Podmoskov’ya v kollektsiyakh estestvenno-nauchnykh muzeev Ross. Akad. Nauk (Geological History of the Moscow Region in Natural Sciences Collections of Museums of Russian Academy of Sciences), Moscow: Nauka, 2008, pp. 60–79.Google Scholar
  88. Sennikov, A.G. and Golubev, V.K., The Permian–Triassic boundary deposit sin the area of the Vyazniki village and the town of Gorokhovets (Vladimir oblast), in Mater. V Mezhd. konf., posvyashchennoi 150-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya V. P. Amalitskogo (1860–1917), Moskva, 22–23 noyabrya 2010 g. “Paleontologiya i stratigrafiya permi i triasa Severnoi Evrazii” (Proc. V Int. Conf. Devoted to the 150th Anniversary of V.P. Amalitsky (1860–1917) “Permian and Triassic Paleontology and Stratigraphy of North Eurasia”, Moscow, November 22–23, 2010), Moscow: Paleontol. Inst. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2010, pp. 102–107.Google Scholar
  89. Sennikov, A.G. and Novikov, I.V., Early Triassic dicynodonts of Eastern Europe, Byull. Mosk. O–va Ispyt. Prir., Otd. Geol., 2011, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 61–64.Google Scholar
  90. Sennikov, A.G. and Golubev, V.K., Finds of the most ancient bystrowianids Axitectum and proterosuchids Vonhuenia, in Paleostrat-2014. Godichn. sobranie (nauchn. konf.) sektsii paleontol. MOIP i Mosk. otdeleniya Paleontol. obshch., Moskva, 27–29 yanvarya 2014 g. (Proc. Ann. Meet. (Sci. Conf.) Paleontol. Sect. Moscow Soc. Nat. Sci. and Moscow Branch Paleontol. Soc. “Paleostrat-2015”, Moscow, January 27–29, 2014), Moscow, 2014, pp. 60–61.Google Scholar
  91. Shevyrev, A.A. and Lozovskii, V.R., The Permian–Triassic boundary in marine series, in Granitsa permi i triasa v kontinental’nykh seriyakh Vostochnoi Evropy (Materialy k Mezhd. simp. “Verkhnepermskie stratotipy Povolzh’ya”) (“The Permian-Triassic Boundary in Continental sections of East Europe” (Proc. Int. Symp. “Upper Permian Stratotypes of the Volga River Region”), Moscow, 1998, pp. 184–210.Google Scholar
  92. Shishkin, M.A., On tripartite division of Upper Tatarian Substage of Upper Permian based on vertebrate faunas, Byull. Mosk. O–va Ispyt. Prir., Otd. Geol., 1990, vol. 65, no. 2.Google Scholar
  93. Shishkin, M.A., Ochev, V.G., and Tverdokhlebov, V.P., Biostratigrafiya kontinental’nogo triasa Yuzhnogo Priural’ya (Biostratigraphy of the Continental Triassic in the Southern Cis-Urals), Moscow: Nauka, 1995 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  94. Smith, R. and Botha, J., The recovery of terrestrial vertebrate diversity in the South African Karoo Basin after the end-Permian extinction, C. R. Palevol, 2005, vol. 4, nos. 6–7, pp. 623–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Stratotipicheskii razrez tatarskogo yarusa na reke Vyatka (The Reference Section of the Tatarian Stage in the Vyatka River Basin), Moscow: GEOS, 2001 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  96. Takahashi, S., Kaiho, K., Oba, M., and Kakegawa, T., A smooth negative shift of organic carbon isotope ratios at an end-Permian mass extinction in pelagic Panthalassa, Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol., 2010, vol. 292, pp. 532–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. The Paleozoic-Mesozoic Boundary Candidate of Global Stratotype Section and Point of the Permian-Triassic boundary, Yin,H., Ed.,Wuhan: China Univ. Geosci. Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  98. Tillyard, R.J., Upper Permian Coleoptera and a new order from the Belmont Beds, New South Wales, Proc. Linn. Soc. N. S. W., 1924, vol. 49, pp. 429–435.Google Scholar
  99. Tozer, E.T., A standard for Triassic time, Geol. Surv. Can. Bull., 1967, vol. 156, pp. 1–103.Google Scholar
  100. Tozer, E.T., The earliest marine Triassic rocks: their definition, ammonoid fauna, distribution and relationship to underlying formations, Bull. Can. Petrol. Geol., 1972, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 643–650.Google Scholar
  101. Ward, P.D., Botha, J., Buick, R., et al., Abrupt and gradual extinction among late Permian land vertebrates in the Karoo Basin, South Africa, Science, 2005, vol. 307, no. 5710, pp. 709–714.Google Scholar
  102. Yaroshenko, O.P. and Lozovsky, V.R., Modification of palynoflora in the Moscow syneclise at the Permian-Triassic boundary, Stratigr. Geol. Correl., 1997, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 543–256.Google Scholar
  103. Yin, H., Zhang, K., Jinnan, T., et al., The global stratotype section and point (GSSP) of the Permian–Triassic boundary, Episodes, 2001, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 102–114.Google Scholar
  104. Yin, H., Jiang, H., Xia, W., et al., The end-Permian regression in South China and its implication on mass extinction, Earth-Sci. Rev., 2014, vol. 137, pp. 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Zakharov, Y.D., Biakov, A.S., Baud, A., and Kozur, H., Significance of Caucasian sections for working out carbon-isotope standard for upper Permian and lower Triassic (Induan) and their correlation with the Permian of north-eastern Russia, J. China Univ., 2005, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 141–151.Google Scholar
  106. Zakharov, Yu.D., Biakov, A.S., and Horacek, M., Global correlation of basal Triassic layers in the light of the first carbon isotope data on the Permian-Triassic boundary in Northeast Asia, Russ. J. Pacific Geol., 2014, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. R. Lozovsky
    • 1
  • Yu. P. Balabanov
    • 2
  • E. V. Karasev
    • 3
  • I. V. Novikov
    • 3
    • 4
  • A. G. Ponomarenko
    • 3
  • O. P. Yaroshenko
    • 5
  1. 1.Russian State Geological Prospecting UniversityMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Kazan Federal UniversityKazanRussia
  3. 3.Paleontological InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  4. 4.University of DodomaDodomaTanzania
  5. 5.Geological InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations