Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 252–264 | Cite as

Trace fossils of precambrian metazoans “Vendobionta” and “Mollusks”

Article

Abstract

Metazoan trace fossils from the Upper Vendian are preserved together with remains of corresponding organisms. The traces belong to “Vendobionta”, representing the Precambrian phylum Proarticulata and to a presumably trochophoran animal Kimberella quadrata. These organisms fed on microbial mats, which preserved fossil traces. Impressions of the mat surface structures, traces, and bodies of animals are preserved in marine terrigenous sediments on the basal surfaces of sandstone beds. Proarticulata grazing traces are represented by groups and chains of impressions left by the ventral side of a body or its central and posterior parts. Kimberella traces are represented by long ridges united into bundles, fans, and chains of fans. All these traces were largely formed mechanically, i.e., by mat scratching with cilia (Proarticulata) or teeth (Kimberella). Proarticulata representatives destroyed only a thin upper layer of the mat, while Kimberella could possibly scratch the mat through its entire thickness or even tear off pieces from it.

Keywords

Vendian trace fossils Vendobionta Metazoa Trochozoa Proarticulata Kimberella 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brasie, M.D. and Antcliffe, B., Dickinsonia from Ediacara: a new look at morphology and body construction, Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., 2008, vol. 270, pp. 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burzin, M.B., About pseudo-parasitism of Vendian (Ediacaran-type) soft-bodied biota, in Tez. Vseross. Simp. “Zagadochnye organizmy v evolyutsii i filogenii” (Evolution and phylogeny of problematic organisms. Proc. All-Rus. Symp.), Moscow: PIN RAN, 1996, pp. 17–19.Google Scholar
  3. Dzik, J. and Ivantsov, A.Yu., An asymmetric segmented organism from the Vendian of Russia and the status of the Dipleurozoa, Histor. Biol., 1999, vol. 13, pp. 255–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dzik, J., Anatomical information content in the Ediacaran fossils and their possible zoological affinities, Integr. Comp. Biol., 2003, vol. 43, pp. 114–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fedonkin, M.A., Systematic description of Vendian Metazoa, in Vendskaya sistema. Istoriko-geologicheskoe i paleontologicheskoe obosnovanie. T. 1. Paleontologiya (Vendian system: historical-geological and paleontological foundation, Vol. 1: Paleontology), Moscow: Nauka, 1985, pp. 70–106.Google Scholar
  6. Fedonkin, M.A., Glimpse into 600 million years Ago, Science in Russia, 2001, no. 6 (126), pp. 4–15.Google Scholar
  7. Fedonkin, M.A., The origin of the Metazoa in the light of the Proterozoic fossil record, Paleontol. Res., 2003, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 9–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fedonkin, M.A., Ivantsov, A.Yu., Leonov, M.V., and Serezhnikova, E.A., Dynamics of evolution and biodiversity in Late Vendian: a view from the White Sea, in The rise and fall of the Vendian (Ediacaran) biota. Origin of modern biosphere. Trans. Intern. Conf. IGCP Project 493, Moscow: Geos, 2007a, pp. 6–9.Google Scholar
  9. Fedonkin, M.A., Simonetta, A., and Ivantsov, A.Yu., New data on Kimberella, the Vendian mollusc-like organism (White Sea region, Russia): palaeoecological and evolutionary implications, The rise and fall of the Ediacaran Biota. Geol. Soc. London. Spec. Publ., 2007b, vol. 286, pp. 157–179.Google Scholar
  10. Fedonkin, M.A. and Vickers-Rich, P., The White Sea’s Windswept coasts, in The rise of animals: evolution and diversification of the Kingdom Animalia, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 2007a, pp. 114–147.Google Scholar
  11. Fedonkin, M.A. and Vickers-Rich, P., First trace of motion, in The rise of animals: evolution and diversification of the Kingdom Animalia, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 2007b, pp. 205–216.Google Scholar
  12. Fedonkin, M.A. and Waggoner, B.M., The Late Precambrian fossil Kimberella is a mollusk-like bilaterian organism, Nature, 1997, vol. 388, pp. 868–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gehling, J.G., The case for Ediacaran fossil roots to the Metazoan tree, Mem. Geol. Soc. India, 1991, vol. 20, pp. 181–223.Google Scholar
  14. Gehling, J.G. and Rigby, J.K., Long-expected sponges from the Neoproterozoic Ediacara fauna, Pound subgroup, South Australia, J. Paleontol., 1996, vol. 70, pp. 185–195.Google Scholar
  15. Gehling, J.G., Ediacara Organisms: relating form to function, in Evolving form and function: fossils and development, New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 2005, pp. 43–66.Google Scholar
  16. Glaessner, M.F., A new genus of Late Precambrian polychaete worms from South Australia, Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust., 1976, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 169–170.Google Scholar
  17. Glaessner, M.F., Precambrian, in Treatise on Invertebrate paleontology. Part A. Introduction. Fossilization (Taphonomy), biogeography and biostratigraphy, Lawrence: Univ. Kansas Press, 1979, pp. 80–118.Google Scholar
  18. Glaessner, M.F. and Wade, M., The Late Precambrian fossils from Ediacara, South Australia, Palaeontology, 1966, vol. 9, pp. 599–628.Google Scholar
  19. Glaessner, M.F. and Wade, M., Praecambridium—a primitive Arthropod, Lethaia, 1971, vol. 4, pp. 71–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grazhdankin, D.V., The structure and sedimentation conditions in the Vendian assemblage in the southeastern White Sea, Stratigr. Geol. Correlation, 2003, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 313–331.Google Scholar
  21. Grazhdankin, D.V., Patterns of distribution in the Ediacaran biotas: facies versus biogeography and evolution, Paleobiol., 2004, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grazhdankin, D.V. and Ivantsov, A.Yu., Reconstruction of biotopes of ancient Metazoa of the Late Vendian White Sea biota, Paleontol. J., 1996, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 676–680.Google Scholar
  23. Grazhdankin, D.V. and Seilacher, A., Underground vendobionta from Namibia, Palaeontology, 2002, vol. 45, pp. 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ivantsov, A.Yu., A new representative of dikinsoniids from the Upper Vendian of the Northern Coast of the White Sea (Russia, Arkhangel’sk Region), Paleontol. Zh., 1999, no. 3, pp. 3–11.Google Scholar
  25. Ivantsov, A.Yu., Movement traces of large Upper Vendian Metazoa on the sediment surface, in Ekosistemnye perestroiki i evolyutsiya biosfery. Iss. 4 (Ecosystem Rearrangements and Evolution of the Biosphere), Moscow: PIN, 2001a, pp. 119–120.Google Scholar
  26. Ivantsov, A.Yu., Vendia and Other Precambrian “Arthropods”, Paleontol. Zh., 2001b, no. 4, pp. 3–10.Google Scholar
  27. Ivantsov, A.Yu., Vendian animals in the Phylum Proarticulata, The rise and fall of the Vendian biota. Abstr. Intern. Symp. IGSP Project 493, Prato, 2004.Google Scholar
  28. Ivantsov, A.Yu., Feeding traces of the Ediacaran animals, Trace fossils: ichnological concepts and methods. Abstr. 33rd Int. Geol. Congr. August 6–14, 2008. Oslo, Norway. Section HPF-17, Oslo, 2008.Google Scholar
  29. Ivantsov, A.Yu. and Fedonkin, M.A., Locomotion trails of the Vendian Invertebrates preserved with the producer’s body fossils, White Sea, Russia, Abstr. N. Amer. Paleontol. Conv., 2001. Paleobios, 2001, vol. 21.Google Scholar
  30. Ivantsov, A.Yu. and Fedonkin, M.A., Movement traces is the final evidence of the animal origin of Ediacaran organisms, in Mater. II Mezhdunar. simpoz. “Evolyutsiya zhizni na Zemle” (Evolution of Life on the Earth. Proc. II Int. Symp.), Tomsk: NTL, 2001, pp. 133–137.Google Scholar
  31. Ivantsov, A.Yu. and Malakhovskaya, Ya.E., Giant traces of Vendian animals, Dokl. Akad. Nauk, 2002, vol. 385, no. 3, pp. 382–386.Google Scholar
  32. Ivantsov, A.Yu., Small Vendian transversely articulated fossils, Paleontol. Zh., 2007, no. 2, pp. 3–10.Google Scholar
  33. Ivantsov, A.Yu., Proarticulata—a phylum of Multicellular Animals that became extinct in the Precambrian, in Evolyutsionnaya morfologiya zhivotnykh. K stoletiyu so dnya rozhdeniya akad. A.V. Ivanova. Ch. I (Evolutionary Morphology of Animals. To the 100th anniversary of Academician A.V.Uvanov), St. Petersburg: Izd. SPbGU, 2008, pp. 32–42.Google Scholar
  34. Ivantsov, A.Yu., A new reconstruction of Kimberella, a problematic Vendian Metazoan, Paleontol. Zh., 2009, no. 6, pp. 3–12.Google Scholar
  35. Ivantsov, A.Yu., The Metazoan Kimberella: Example of Vendian Fossils Interpretation in Tr. Mezhdunar. nauchn. konf. “Charl’z Darvin i sovremennaya biologiya”, 21–23 sentyabrya 2009 g. (Charles Darwin and modern biology. Proc. Int. Sci. Conf., September 21–23, 2009), St. Petersburg, 2010, pp. 406–419.Google Scholar
  36. Ivantsov, A.Yu., Paleontological evidence for the supposed Precambrian evolution of mollusks, Paleontol. J., 2010, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 1552–1559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ivantsov, A.Yu., Feeding traces of Proarticulata—the Vendian Metazoa, Paleontol. Zh., 2011, no. 3, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
  38. Jenkins, R.J.F., Functional and ecological aspects of Ediacaran assemblages in Origin and Early Evolution of the Metazoa, New York: Plenum Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  39. Jenkins, R.J.F., The problems and potential of using animal fossils and trace fossils in terminal Proterozoic biostratigraphy, Precambrian Res., 1995, vol. 73, pp. 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jenkins, R.J.F. and Gehling, J.G., A review of the frondlike fossils of the Ediacara assemblage, Rec. S. Aust. Museum, 1978, vol. 17, no. 23, pp. 347–359.Google Scholar
  41. Jensen, S., The Proterozoic and earliest Cambrian trace fossil record; patterns, problems and perspectives, Integr. Comp. Biol., 2003, vol. 43, pp. 219–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jensen, S., Gehling, J.G., and Droser, M., Ediacara-type fossils in Cambrian sediments, Nature, 1998, vol. 393, pp. 567–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leo, W.B. and Seilacher, A., The Phylum Vendobionta: a sister group of the Eumetazoa?, Paleobiol., 1994, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
  44. Menner, V.V., The other problematical organic remains, in Stratigrafiya SSSR. Verkhnii dokembrii (Stratigraphy of the USSR. Upper Precambrian), Moscow: Nauka, 1963, pp. 504–505.Google Scholar
  45. Palii, V.M., Remains of soft-bodied fauna and trace fossils from Upper Precambrian and Lower Cambrian deposits in Podolia, in Paleontologiya i stratigrafiya verkhnego dokembriya i nizhnego paleozoya yugo-zapada Vostochno-Evropeiskoi platformy (Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Upper Precambrian and Lower Cambrian in Southwestern Areas of the East European Platform), Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1976, pp. 63–77.Google Scholar
  46. Ruppert, E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D., Invertebrate zoology: a functional evolutionary approach, 7th edition, Belmont, CA, USA: Thomas/Brooks/Cole, 2004.Google Scholar
  47. Seilacher, A., Studien Zur Palichnologie. I. Über die Methoden der Palichnologie, Neues Jahrb. Geol. Paläntol. Abhandl., 1953, vol. 96, pp. 421–452.Google Scholar
  48. Seilacher, A., Vendozoa: organismic construction in the Proterozoic biosphere, Lethaia, 1989, vol. 22, pp. 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Seilacher, A., Vendobionta and Psammocorallia: lost construction of Precambrian evolution, J. Geol. Soc., 1992, vol. 149, pp. 607–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Seilacher, A., Biomat-related lifestyles in the Precambrian, Palaios, 1999, vol. 14, pp. 86–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Seilacher, A., Trace fossils analysis, Berlin: Springer, 2007.Google Scholar
  52. Seilacher, A., Fossil art an exhibition of the Geologisches Institut Tubingen University Germany, Munchen, 2008.Google Scholar
  53. Seilacher, A., Grazhdankin, D.V., and Leguta, A., Ediacaran biota: the dawn of animal life in the shadow of giant protists, Paleontol. Res., 2003, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Voigt, E., On grazing traces produced by the Radula fossil and recent gastropods and chitons, in Trace fossils 2. Proc. Int. Symp., Liverpool: Seel House Press, 1997, pp. 335–346.Google Scholar
  55. Wade, M., Preservation of soft-bodied animals in Precambrian or Cambrian sandstones at Ediacara, South Australia, Lethaia, 1968, vol. 1, pp. 238–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wade, M., Dickinsonia: Polychaete worms from the Late Precambrian Ediacara fauna, South Australia, Mem. Queensl. Museum, 1972, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 171–190.Google Scholar
  57. Wade, M., Hydrozoa and Scyphozoa and other medusoids from the Precambrian Ediacara fauna, South Australia, Palaeontology, 1972b, vol. 15, pp. 197–225.Google Scholar
  58. Zakrevskaya, M.A., The characteristics of two buried assemblages of Upper Vendian Metazoa in the Arkhangel’sk Region, in Sovremennaya paleontologiya: klassicheskie i noveishie metody (Modern paleontology: classical and newest methods), Moscow: PIN RAN, 2011, pp. 9–19Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Borissiak Paleontological InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations