Advertisement

Petrology

, Volume 25, Issue 6, pp 615–624 | Cite as

Geodynamics of the origin of granulites in the Sangilen block of the Tuva–Mongolian terrane, Central Asian Orogenic Belt

  • I. K. Kozakov
  • P. Ya. Azimov
Article
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

The Tuva–Mongolian terrane of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt is a composite structure with a Vendian–Cambrian terrigenous–carbonate cover. The Sangilen block in the southern part of the belt is a smaller composite structure, in which tectono–stratigraphic complexes of different age that were produced under various conditions were amalgamated in the course of Early Paleozoic tectonic cycle. The P–T parameters of the Early Paleozoic metamorphism in the western part of the Sangilen block corresponded to the amphibolite facies. The gneisses of the Erzin Complex contain relict granulite-facies mineral assemblages. The granulites are dominated by metasediments typical of deep-water basins on passive continental margins. The only exception is granulites of the Lower Erzin tectonic nappe of the Chinchlig thrust system: these rocks are metatholeiites, tonalites, and trondhjemites, whose REE patterns are similar to those of MORB. The composition of these granulites and their high Sm/Nd ratios indicate that the rocks were derived from juvenile crust that had been formed in an environment of a mature island arc or backarc basin. It is reasonable to believe that these rocks are fragments of the Late Riphean basement of the Sangilen block. The average 206Pb/238U zircon age of the garnet–hypersthene granulites is 494 ± 11 Ma. With regard for the zircon age of the postmetamorphic granitoids, the granulite-facies metamorphism occurred within the age range of 505–495 Ma. The peak metamorphic temperature reached 910–950°C, and the pressure was 3–4 kbar, which corresponds to ultrahigh-temperature/low-pressure (UHT–LP) metamorphism. The garnet–hypersthene orthogranulites were formed at a temperature that decreased to ~850°C and pressure that increased to ~5.5‒7 kbar. It can be hypothesized that the earlier UHT–LP granulites were produced at an elevated heat flux and were later (in the course of continuing collision) overlain by a relatively cold tectonic slab, and this leads to a certain temperature decrease and pressure increase. This relatively cold slab could consist of fragments of the Vendian elevated-pressure metamorphic belt whose development terminated at the Vendian–Cambrian boundary before the onset of the Early Paleozoic regional metamorphism.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aranovich, L.Y. and Berman, R.G., Optimized standard state and solution properties of minerals. II. Comparisons, predictions, and applications, Contrib. Mineral. Petrol., 1996, vol. 126, nos. 1–2, pp. 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azimov, P.Ya. and Kozakov, I.K., Conditions of granulite metamorphism in the metamorphic complexes of Tuva and Monglia (Central Asian Fold Belt), Geodinamicheskaya evolyutsiya litosfery Tsentral’no-Aziatskogo podvizhnogo poyasa (ot okeana k kontinentu): Materialy soveshchaniya. T. 1: Tez. Dokl. (Geodynamics Evolution of Lithosphere of the Central Asian Mobile Belt. Proceedings of Conference), Irkutsk: Inst. Geogr. SO RAN, 2004, pp. 11–14.Google Scholar
  3. Belichenko, V.G. and Boos, R.G. Bokson–Khubsugul–Dzabkhan paleomicrocontinent in the structure of the Central Asian Paleozoides, Geol. Geofiz., 1988, no. 12, pp. 20–28.Google Scholar
  4. Berman, R.G., Thermobarometry using multiequilibrium calculations: a new technique with petrologic applications, Can. Mineral., 1991, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 833–855.Google Scholar
  5. Berman, R.G. and Aranovich, L.Y., Optimized standard state and solution properties of minerals. I. Model calibration for olivine, orthopyroxene, cordierite, garnet, and ilmenite in the system FeO–MgO–CaO–Al2O3–TiO2–SiO2, Contrib. Mineral. Petrol., 1996, vol. 126, nos. 1–2, pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Didenko, A.N., Mossakovskii, A.A., Pecherskii, D.M., et al., Geodynamics of Paleozoic oceans of Central Asia, Geol. Geofiz., 1994, vol. 35, no. 7–8, pp. 59–75.Google Scholar
  7. Gibsher, A.S., Khain, E.V., Kotov, A.B., et al., Late vendian age of the Khan–Taishiri ophiolite complex in western Mongolia, Russ Geol. Geophys., 2001, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1179–1185.Google Scholar
  8. Harley, S.L., On the occurrence and characterization of ultrahigh-temperature crustal metamorphism, What Drives Metamorphism and Metamorphic Reactions?, Treloar, P.J., O’Brien, P.J., Eds., Geol. Soc. London, Spec. Publ., 1998, vol. 138, pp. 81–107.Google Scholar
  9. Il’in, A.V., Geologicheskoe razvitie Yuzhnoi Sibiri i Mongolii v pozdnem dokembrii-kembrii (Geological Evolution of the South Siberia and Mongolia in the Late Precambrian–Cambrian), Moscow: Nauka, 1982.Google Scholar
  10. Kovach, V.P., Yarmolyuk, V.V., Kovalenko, V.I., et al., Composition, sources, and mechanisms of formation of the continental crust of the Lake Zone of the Central Asian Caledonides. II. Geochemical and Nd isotope data, Petrology, 2011, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 399–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kozakov, I.K., Kotov, A.B., Sal’nikova, E.B., et al., Metamorphic age of crystalline complexes of the Tuva–Mongolia Massif: the U–Pb geochronology of granitoids, Petrology, 1999, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 177–191.Google Scholar
  12. Kozakov, I.K., Kotov, A.B., Sal’nikova, E.B., et al., Timing of the structural evolution of metamorphic rocks in the Tuva–Mongolian Massif, Geotectonics, 2001, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 165–184.Google Scholar
  13. Kozakov, I.K., Sal’nikova, E.B., Khain, E.V., et al., Early Caledonian crystalline rocks of the Lake Zone in Mongolia: formation history and tectonic settings as deduced from U-Pb and Sm–Nd datings, Geotectonics, 2002, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 156–166.Google Scholar
  14. Kozakov, I.K., Kovach, V.P., Yarmolyuk V.V., et al., Crustforming processes in the geologic development of the Tuva-Mongolia Massif: Sm-Nd isotopic and geochemical data for granitoids, Petrology, 2003, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 444–463.Google Scholar
  15. Kozakov, I.K., Natman, A., Sal’nikova, E.B., et al., Metasedimentary complexes of the Tuva–Mongolian massif: age, provenances, and tectonic position, Stratigraphy. Geol. Correlation, 2005, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
  16. Kozakov, I.K., Kovach, V.P., Bibikova, E.V., et al., Late Riphean episode in the formation of crystalline rock complexes in the Dzabkhan Microcontinent: geological, geochronologic, and Nd isotopic-geochemical data, Petrology, 2014, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 480–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kretz, R., Symbols for rock-forming minerals, Am. Mineral., 1983, vol. 68, pp. 277–279.Google Scholar
  18. Krylov, D.P. and Kozakov, I.K., The O, Sr, and Nd isotopic systems of the late collisional granitoids of the Tuva–Mongolia Massif, Petrology, 2005, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 589–595.Google Scholar
  19. Kuzmichev, A.B. and Larionov, A.N., The Sarkhoi Group in East Sayan: Neoproterozoic (~770–800 Ma) volcanic belt of the Andean type, Russ. Geol. Geophys., 2011, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 685–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kuzmichev, A.B. and Larionov, A.N., Neoproterozoic island arcs in East Sayan: duration of magmatism (from U-Pb zircon dating of volcanic clastics), Russ. Geol. Geophys., 2013, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kuzmichev, A.B., Zhuravlev, D.Z., Bibikova, E.V., and Kirnozova, T.I., Upper Riphean (790 Ma) granitoids in the Tuva–Mongolia Massif: evidence for the Early Baikalian Orogenesis, Geol. Geofiz., 2000, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 1379–1383.Google Scholar
  22. Kuzmichev, A.B., Bibikova, E.V., and Zhuravlev, D.Z., Neoproterozoic (~800 Ma) orogeny in the Tuva–Mongolia massif (Siberia): island arc—continent collision at the northeast Rodinia margin, Precambrian Res., 2001, vol. 110, pp. 109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kuznetsov, A.B., Letnikova, E.F., Vishnevskaya, I.A., et al., Sr chemostratigraphy of carbonate sedimentary cover of the Tuva–Mongolian Microcontinent, Dokl. Earth Sci., 2010, vol. 432, no. 3, pp. 577–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rojas-Agramonte, Y., Kröner, A., Alexeiev, D.V., et al., Detrital and igneous zircon ages for supracrustal rocks of the Kyrgyz Tianshan and palaeogeographic implications, Gondwana Res., 2014, vol. 26, pp. 957–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Salnikova, E.B., Kozakov, I.K., Kotov, A.B., et al., Age of palaeozoic granites and metamorphism in the Tuvino- Mongolian massif of the Central Asian mobile belt: loss of Precambrian microcontinent, Precambrian Res., 2001, vol. 110, pp. 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sudovikov, N.G., Glebovitskii, V.A., Sergeev, A.S., et al., Geologicheskoe razvitie glubinnykh zon podvizhnykh poyasov (Severnoe Priladozh’e) (Geological Evolution of Deep- Seted Zones of Mobile Belts), Nauka: Leningr. otd., 1969.Google Scholar
  27. Yarmolyuk, V.V., Kovach, V.P., Kovalenko, V.I., et al., Composition, sources, and mechanism of continental crust growth in the Lake Zone of the Central Asian Caledonides: I. Geological and geochronological data, Petrology, 2011, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Precambrian Geology and GeochronologyRussian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations