Advertisement

Journal of Volcanology and Seismology

, Volume 1, Issue 5, pp 319–327 | Cite as

The response of water level in the YuZ-5 well, Kamchatka to the magnitude 9.3, Sumatra-Andaman earthquake of December 26, 2004

  • G. N. Kopylova
  • S. V. Boldina
Article
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

Forced and free oscillations of water level were recorded in the YuZ-5 well, Kamchatka due to the passage of seismic waves from the Sumatra-Andaman earthquake of December 26, 2004, M w = 9.3, hypocentral distance 8250 km. The greatest amplitude of water level oscillations, at least 5 cm, was observed during the onset of seismic surface waves with a typical period of 20–50 s. The total duration of the forced and free water level oscillations was about ten hours. The available theoretical models that describe oscillations of water level in a well due to seismic waves and rapid injection of water were used to estimate the transmissivity of the aquifer. The values obtained exceed by at least two orders of magnitude the transmissivity derived from pumping test measurements. A hypothesis was proposed to explain the temporary increase in aquifer transmissivity during the passage of seismic waves by invoking disturbances in the structure of the crack-pore space and a sharp increase in aquifer rock permeability.

Keywords

Water Level Ground Motion Seismic Wave Water Level Change Water Level Variation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Katalog predvestnikov zemletryasenii. Gidrogeodinamicheskie predvestniki (A Catalog of Earthquake Precursors: Hydrogeodynamic Precursors), Moscow: IFZ AN SSSR, 1983.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kopylova, G.N., Lyubushin, A.A., Jr., Malugin, V.A., et al., Hydrodynamic Observations at the Petropavlovsk Site, Kamchatka, Vulkanol. Seismol., 2000, no. 4, pp. 69–79.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kopylova, G.N. and Boldina, S.V., Evaluation of Pore Elastic Parameters for an Aquifer: Water Level Observations at the YuZ-5 Well, Kamchatka, Vulkanol. Seismol., 2006, no. 2, pp. 17–28.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Osnovy gidrogeologii. Gidrogeodinamika (Principles of Hydrogeology. Hydrogeodynamics), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1983.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sindalovskii, L.N., Spravochnik analiticheskikh reshenii dlya interpretatsii opytno-fil’tratsionnykh oprobovanii (A Handbook of Analytical Solutions for Interpretation of Percolation Tests), St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University, 2006.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shmonov, V.M., Vitovtova, V.M., and Zharikov, A.V., The Influence of Seismic Vibration on Rock Permeability in Connection with the Disposal of Nuclear Waste, in: Flyuidnaya pronitsaemost’ porod zemnoi kory (Fluid Permeability of Crustal Rocks), Moscow: Nauchnyi Mir, 2002, pp. 155–161.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cooper, H.H., Bredehoeft, J.D., Papadopulos, I.S., et al., The Response of Well-Aquifer System to Seismic Waves, J. Geophys. Res., 1965, vol. 70, pp. 3915–3926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sterling, A. and Smets, E., Study of Earth Tides, Earthquakes and Terrestrial Spectroscopy by Analysis of the Level Fluctuations in Borehole at Haibaart (Belgium), Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 1971, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 225–242.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Van der Kamp, G., Determining Aquifer Transmissivity by Means of Well Response Tests: The Underdamped Case, Water Resources Res., 1976, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 71–77.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. N. Kopylova
    • 1
  • S. V. Boldina
    • 1
  1. 1.Kamchatka Branch, Geophysical ServiceRussian Academy of SciencesPetropavlovsk-KamchatskiiRussia

Personalised recommendations