Human Physiology

, Volume 43, Issue 7, pp 751–756 | Cite as

Interpersonal Interaction under the Conditions of High Autonomy in Interplanetary Mission Simulation (Mars-500 Experiment)

  • P. G. Kuznetsova
  • V. I. Gushchin
  • A. G. Vinokhodova
  • A. I. Chekalina
  • D. M. Shved
Article
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

This paper discusses the influence of the social status and psychological stability of individuals on their communicative behavior in space flight on the basis of retrospective analysis of the findings of the Mars-500 experiment, in which six participants were isolated for a period of simulating a long-term exploration mission. Data were obtained using both classic social-psychological methods and observation of video recorded behavior. Communicative behavior of the crew members was dependent on the level of individual anxiety and social status in the isolated small group.

Keywords

long-term isolation communication strategies psychological stability anxiety leadership video monitoring 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ushakov, I.B., Morukov, B.V., Bubeev, Yu.A., Gushin, V.I., Vasil’eva, G.Yu., Vinokhodova, A.G., and Shved, D.M., Main findings of psychophysiological studies in the Mars 500 experiment, Herald Russ. Acad. Sci., 2014, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 106–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grigor’ev, A.I., Demin, E.P., Bystritskaya, A.F., et al., Some principles of Mars mission crew life and performance organization, Aviakosm. Ekol. Med., 2002, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 3–7.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kanas, N. and Manzey, D., Space Psychology and Psychiatry, New York: Springer-Verlag, 2008.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Altman, I., Taylor, D.A., and Wheeler, L., Ecological aspects of group behavior in social isolation, J. Appl. Psychol., 1971, no. 1, pp. 76–100.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Palinkas, L.A., The psychology of isolated and confined environments: understanding human behavior in Antarctica, Am. Psychol., 2003, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 353–363.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harrison, F. and Connors, M., Groups in exotic environments, Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 1984, no. 18, pp. 49–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Novikov, M.A., Psychophysiological and ecopsychological aspects of interpersonal interactions in autonomous environment, in Problema obshcheniya v psikhologii (Problem of Communication in Psychology), Moscow, 1981, pp. 178–217.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gushchin, V.I., Zaprisa, N., Kolinichenko, T.B., et al., The dynamics of the subjective perception of interrelations in crew during long-term isolation, Aviakosm. Ekol. Med., 1997, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 23–29.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gushchin, V.I., Pystinnikova, J., and Smirnova, T.M., Interrelations between the small isolated groups with homogeneous and heterogeneous composition, J. Hum. Perform. Extreme Environ., 2001, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 25–33.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Model’nyi eksperiment s dlitel’noi izolyatsiei: problemy i dostizheniya (Modeling of Prolonged Isolation: Problems and Achievements), Baranov, V.M., Ed., Moscow: Slovo, 2001.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Khananashvili, M.M., Vinokhodova, A.G., Gushchin, V.I., and Sal’nitskii, V.P., The new in psychological selection of crew, training and operating in the conditions of piloted expedition to Mars, Vestn. Ross. Gumanit. Nauch. Fonda, 2008, no. 1 (50), pp. 137–146.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vinokhodova, A.G., Bystritskaya, A.F., and Smirnova, T.M., The ability to psychic self-regulation as a resistance factor to stress in extreme conditions of space flight, Aviakosm. Ekol. Med., 2005, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 14–18.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rivolier, J., Le concept de stress, in Stress Anxiete: Les Faux-Semblants, Paris: Upjohn, 1994, pp. 13–55.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskii klimat kollektiva: Spetspraktikum po sotsial’noi psikhologii (Social-Psychological Atmosphere in the Collective: Special Practical Manual on Social Psychology), Zhukov, Yu.M., Ed., Moscow, 1981.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vinokhodova, A.G., Bystritskaya, A.F., and Smirnova, T.M., Evaluation of individual stress resistance of cosmonauts during professional selection of the specialists for the complex and responsible activities, Aviakosm. Ekol. Med., 2007, vol. 41, no. 6/1, pp. 20–22.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sobchik, L.N., Metod tsvetovykh vyborov—modifikatsiya vos’mitsvetovogo testa Lyushera: Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo (The Method of Color Selection—Modification of Eight-Color Luscher Test: Practical Manual), St. Petersburg: Rech’, 2007.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tafforin, C., Vinokhodova, A., Chekalina, A., and Gushin, V., Correlation of etho-social and psychosocial data from “Mars-500” interplanetary simulation, Acta Astronaut., 2015, vol. 3, pp. 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mal’gina, L.F., Emotional stability as a mean of development of the intellectual abilities of the individuals, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Psychol.) Dissertation, Novosibirsk, 2009.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shol’tsova, I. and Vinokhodova, A.G., Control locus, stress resistance, and personal growth of the participants in experiment Mars-500, Aviakosm. Ekol. Med., 2013, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 24–29.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. G. Kuznetsova
    • 1
  • V. I. Gushchin
    • 1
  • A. G. Vinokhodova
    • 1
  • A. I. Chekalina
    • 1
  • D. M. Shved
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Biomedical ProblemsRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations