Human Physiology

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 242–250 | Cite as

Effects of unconscious perception of acoustic stimuli on event-related potential parameters

  • E. A. KopeikinaEmail author
  • V. V. Choroshich
  • A. Y. Aleksandrov
  • V. Y. Ivanova


The influence of unconscious perception of acoustic stimuli on the event-related electrical activity of the human brain was determined. For this purpose, the event-related potentials (ERPs) evoked by the acoustic stimuli presented in the unconscious priming paradigm were recorded in the subjects. Monosyllabic Russian words with a single vowel letter substitution (‘sad’ and ‘sud’) and the pseudoword ‘sid’ were chosen as stimuli for priming. It was found that repetition and alternative priming significantly and similarly affected the ERP component amplitude with 200 ms latency after target application in the central, parietal, and temporal leads. Under the conditions of alternative priming, the direction of the potential amplitude modification with a latency of 400 ms was altered for the word and pseudoword targets. Alternative priming significantly increased the amplitude of this component with a pseudoword target and decreased it if the word existing in the language was used as a target stimulus. Since none of the participants was able to distinguish the applied prime stimuli, the changes in the ERP amplitude parameters might have been evoked by unconscious perception of acoustic stimuli by the subjects. The ERP amplitude dynamics revealed in this study demonstrates the possibility that subliminal acoustic stimuli modulate the electrical activity evoked by verbal acoustic stimulation.


subconscious perception acoustic priming event-related potentials 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Gershuni, G.V., Study of subsensory reactions during the activity of sense organs, Fiziol. Zh. SSSR, 1947, vol. 33, no. 4, p. 393.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kouider, S., Gardelle, V., Dehaene, S., et al., Cerebral bases of subliminal speech priming, Neuroimage, 2010, vol. 49, p. 922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gallagher, S. and Schmicking, D., Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science, Springer, 2010, p. 688.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daza, M.T. and Ortells, J.J., Perception without awareness: further evidence form Stroop priming task, Percept. Psychophysics., 2002, vol. 64, p. 1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Merikle, P.M. and Reingold, E.M., Recognition and lexical decision without detection: unconscious perception?, J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percep. Perform., 1990, vol. 16, no. 3, p. 574.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Whalen, P.J., Rauch, S.L., Etcoff, N.L., et al., Masked presentations of emotional facial expressions modulate amygdala activity without explicit knowledge, J. Neurosci., 1998, vol. 18, p. 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kouider, S., Eger, E., Dolan, R., and Henson, R.N., Activity in face-responsive brain regions is modulated by invisible, attended faces: evidence from masked priming, Cereb. Cortex, 2009, vol. 19, p. 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Holcomb, P.J. and Grainger, J., ERP effects of short-interval masked associative and repetition priming, J. Neurolinguistics, 2009, vol. 22, p. 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Koivisto, M., Kainulainen, P., and Revonsuo, A., Relation between awareness and attention: Evidence from ERP responses, Neuropsychologia, 2009, vol. 47, p. 2891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Siegel, P. and Weinberger, J., Very brief exposure: the effect of unreportable stimuli on fearful behavior, Consciousness Cogn., 2009, vol. 18, p. 939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Siegel, P. and Weinberger, J., Less is more: the effects of very brief versus clearly visible exposure, Emotion, 2012, vol. 12, p. 394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weinberger, J., Seigel, P., Seifert, C., and Drwal, J., What you can see can help you: the effect of exposure to unreportable stimuli on approach behavior, Consciousness Cogn., 2011, vol. 20, p. 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oldfield, R.C., The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory, Neuropsychologia, 1971, vol. 9, p. 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cohen-Swerdlik, Psychological Testing and Assessment: An Introduction to Test and Measurement, McGraw-Hill, 2009, 7th edition.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lyashevskaya, O.N. and Sharov, S.A., Chastotnyi slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo yazyka (na materialakh Natsional’nogo korpusa russkogo yazyka) (Frequency Dictionary of Modern Russian Based on the Materials of the National Body of the Russian Language), Moscow: Azbukovnik, 2009. htpp:// Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dupoux, E., de Gardelle, V., and Kouider, S., Subliminal speech perception and auditory streaming, Cognition, 2008, vol. 109, no. 2, p. 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hagoort, P., The memory, unification, and control (MUC) model of language, in Automaticity and Control in Language Processing, Meyer, A.S., Wheeldon L., and Krott, A., Eds., Hove: Psychology, 2007.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Crowley, K. and Colrain, I., A review of the evidence for P2 being an independent component process: Age, sleep and modality, Clin. Neurophysiol., 2004, vol. 115, no. 4, p. 732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pascalis, V., Cozzuto, G., and Russo, E., Effects of personality trait emotionality on acoustic startle response and prepulse inhibition including N100 and P200 event-related potential, Clin. Neurophysiol., 2013, vol. 124, p. 292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Luck, S.J. and Hillyard, S.A., Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search, Psychophysiology, 1994, vol. 31, p. 291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Phillips, S. and Takeda, Y., An EEG/ERP study of efficient versus inefficient visual search, J. Cogn. Sci. Soc., 2009, vol. 33, p. 383.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kong, L., Zhang, B., Zhang, J.X., and Kang, C., P200 can be modulated by orthography alone in reading Chinese words, Neurosci. Lett., 2012, vol. 529, p. 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kong, L., Zhang, J.X., Kang, C., et al., P200 and phonological processing in Chinese word recognition, Neurosci. Lett., 2010, vol. 473, p. 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Evans, K.M. and Federmeier, K.D., The memory that’s right and the memory that’s left: event-related potentials reveal hemispheric asymmetries in the encoding and retention of verbal information, Neuropsychologia, 2007, vol. 45, p. 1777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Portnova, G.V., Martynova, O.V., and Ivanitsky, G.A., Age Differences of Event-Related Potentials in the Perception of Successive and Spatial Components of Auditory Information, Hum. Physiol., 2014, vol. 40, no. 1, p. 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lucas, H.D., Taylor, J.R., Henson, R.N., and Paller, K.A., Many roads lead to recognition: electrophysiological correlates of familiarity derived from short-term masked repetition priming, Neuropsychologia, 2012, vol. 50, p. 3041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Deacon, D., Hewitt, S., Yang, C.-M., and Nagata, M., Event-related potential indices of semantic priming using masked and unmasked words: evidence that the N400 does not reflect a post-lexical process, Cogn. Brain Res., 2000, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kiefer, M., The N400 is modulated by unconsciously perceived masked words: further evidence for an automatic spreading activation account of N400 priming effects, Cogn. Brain Res., 2002, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Justus, T., Yang, J., Larsen, J., et al., An event-related potential study of cross-modal morphological and phonological priming, J. Neurolinguistics, 2009, vol. 22, p. 584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hill, H., Ott, F., and Weisbrod, M., SOA-dependent N400 and P300 semantic priming effects using pseudoword primes and a delayed lexical decision, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 2005, vol. 56, no. 13, p. 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Coch, D. and Mitra, P., Word and pseudoword superiority effects reflected in the ERP waveform, Brain Res., 2010, vol. 1329, p. 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. A. Kopeikina
    • 1
    Email author
  • V. V. Choroshich
    • 1
  • A. Y. Aleksandrov
    • 1
  • V. Y. Ivanova
    • 1
  1. 1.St. Petersburg State UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations