Advertisement

Programming and Computer Software

, Volume 42, Issue 6, pp 347–355 | Cite as

A unified approach to adapt scientific visualization systems to third-party solvers

  • K. V. RyabininEmail author
  • S. I. Chuprina
Article

Abstract

This paper presents a new unified approach to adapt scientific visualization systems to third-party solvers implemented on different software and hardware platforms. This approach allows building multiplatform visualization systems, enables automatic conversion of input and output data from any solver into a rendering-compatible format, and provides real-time generation of high-quality images. The automated adaptation of visualization systems to third-party solvers is based on ontological engineering methods. Multiplatform portability is provided by the automatic generation of a graphical user interface (GUI) for each particular operating system and by preprocessing the data to be rendered by using heuristic-based tools, which ensures compatibility with different hardware and software platforms, including desktop computers and mobile devices. In addition, an original anti-aliasing algorithm is proposed to ensure high quality of resulting images. Based on the proposed approach, a multiplatform scientific visualization system called SciVi is developed, which is successfully used for solving various real-world scientific visualization problems from different application domains.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Vasil’ev, V.R., Voloboi, A.G., V’yukova, N.I., and Galaktionov, V.A., Context visualization of spatial data, Inf. Tekhnol. Vychisl. Sist., 2004, no. 4, pp. 25–34.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ryabinin, K. and Chuprina, S., Development of multiplatform adaptive rendering tools to visualize scientific experiments, Procedia Comput. Sci., 2014, vol. 29, pp. 1825–1834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bondarev, A.E. and Galaktionov, V.A., Multidimensional analysis in multiparametric optimization problems with the use of visualization methods, Nauchn. Vizualizatsiya, 2012, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ryabinin, K. and Chuprina, S., Development of ontology-based multiplatform adaptive scientific visualization system, J. Comput. Sci., 2015, vol. 10, pp. 370–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gavrilova, T.A. and Khoroshevskii, V.F., Bazy znanii intellektual’nykh sistem (Knowledge Bases for Intelligent Systems), St. Petersburg: Piter, 2001.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Richardson, T., Stafford-Fraser, Q., Wood, K.R., and Hopper, A., Virtual network computing, IEEE Internet Comput., 1998, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lizandra, M.C.J., Graphic libraries for Windows programming, XRDS, 2000, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 14–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lottes, T., Fast Approximate Anti-Aliasing. NVidia, 2009. http://developer.download.nvidia.com/assets/gamedev/files/sdk/11/FXAA_WhitePaper.pdf.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ryabinin, K.V., Adaptive anti-aliasing for mobile devices, Vestn. Komp’yuternykh Inf. Tekhnol., 2014, no. 8, pp. 23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Keval, H. and Sasse, M.A., To catch a thief–you need at least 8 frames per second: The impact of frame rates on user performance in a CCTV detection task, Proc.16th ACM Int. Conf. Multimedia, 2008, pp. 941–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Perm State UniversityPermRussia

Personalised recommendations