Advertisement

Programming and Computer Software

, Volume 39, Issue 1, pp 10–24 | Cite as

Simulation of hierarchical multiprocessor database systems

Article

Abstract

The paper is dedicated to issues concerning simulation and analysis of hierarchical multiprocessor systems oriented to database applications. Requirements for a parallel database system model are given. A survey and comparative analysis of known parallel database system models are presented. A new multiprocessor database system model is introduced. This model allows us to simulate and evaluate arbitrary hierarchical multiprocessor configurations in the context of the OLTP class database applications. Examples of using the database multiprocessor model for simulation study of multiprocessor database systems are presented.

Keywords

Multiprocessor System Database Application Disk Module Processor Module Many Integrate Core 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Agrawal, R., Ailamaki, A., Bernstein, P.A., et al., The Claremont Report on Database Research, Commun. ACM, 2009, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agrawal, R., Carey, M.J., and Livny, M., Concurrency Control Performance Modeling: Alternatives and Implications, ACM Trans. Database Systems, 1987, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 609–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alfawair, M., Aldabbas, et al., Grid Evolution, Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Computer Engineering & Systems (Cairo, Egypt, 2007), IEEE Comput. Soc., 2007, pp. 158–163.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gray, J. et al., Scientific Data Management in the Coming Decade, SIGMOD Record, 2005, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Becla, J. and Wang, D.L. Lessons Learned from Managing a Petabyte, CIDR 2005, Second Biennial Conf. on Innovative Data Systems Research, Asilomar, CA, USA, 2005. Online Proceedings, 2005, pp. 70–83. http://www.cidrdb.org/cidr2005. Accessed November 8, 2009.
  6. 6.
    Bell, G., Gray, J., and Szalay, A.S., Petascale Computational Systems, IEEE Comput., 2006, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 110–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bhide, A., An Analysis of Three Transaction Processing Architectures, Proc. of the Fourteenth Int. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB’88) (Los Angeles, 1988), Morgan Kaufmann, 1988, pp. 339–350.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bhide, A. and Stonebraker, M., A Performance Comparison of Two Architectures for Fast Transaction Processing, Proc. of the Fourth Int. Conf. on Data Engineering (Los Angeles, 1988), IEEE Comput. Soc., 1988, pp. 536–545.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bhide, A. and Stonebraker, M., Performance Issues in High Performance Transaction Processing Architectures, Proc. of the 2nd Int. Workshop on High Performance Transaction Systems (Asilomar, 1987), Springer, 1989, vol. 359, pp. 277–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carey, M.J. and Livny, M., Distributed Concurrency Control Performance: A Study of Algorithms, Distribution, and Replication, Proc. of the VLDB Conf. (Los Angeles, 1988), Morgan Kaufmann, 1988, pp. 13–25.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carey, M.J. and Livny, M., Parallelism and Concurrency Control Performance in Distributed Database Machines, Proc. of the 1989 ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. on the Management of Data, Portland, 1989; ACM, 1989, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 122–133.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Carey, M. and Stonebraker, M., The Performance of Concurrency Control Algorithms for Database Management Systems, Proc. of the 10th VLDB Conf. (Singapore, 1984), Morgan Kaufmann, 1984, pp. 107–118.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    DeWitt, D.J., Ghandeharizadeh, S., Schneider, D., Bricker, A., Hsiao, H.I., and Rasmussen, R., The Gamma Database Machine Project, IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Eng., 1990, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 44–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ghazal, A. et al., Exploiting Interactions among Query Rewrite Rules in the Teradata DBMS, Proc. of the 19th Int. Conf. “Database and Expert Systems Applications” (DEXA 2008) (Turin, 2008), Springer, 2008, vol. 5181, pp. 596–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hanlon, M., Klein, J., Linden, R., and Zeller, H., Publish/Subscribe in NonStop SQL: Transactional Streams in a Relational Context, Proc. of the 20th Int. Conf. on Data Engineering (Boston, 2004), IEEE Comput. Soc., 2004, pp. 821–825.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hsiao, H.I. and DeWitt, D.J., A Performance Study of Three High Availability Data Replication Strategies, Distributed Parallel Databases, 1993, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hughes, C.J., Changkyu, K., and Yen-Kuang, C., Performance and Energy Implications of Many-Core Caches for Throughput Computing, IEEE Micro, 2010, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lakshmi, M.S. and Yu, P.S., Effect of Skew on Join Performance in Parallel Architectures, Proc. of the First Int. Symp. on Databases in Parallel and Distributed Systems (Austin, Texas, 1988), IEEE Comput. Soc., 1988, pp. 107–120.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Livny, M., DeNet User’s Guide, Version 1.0, Comp. Sci. Dept., Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, 1988.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maertens, H., A Classification of Skew Effects in Parallel Database Systems, Proc. of the 7th Int. Euro-Par Conf. (Manchester, UK, 2001), Springer, 2001, vol. 2150, pp. 291–300.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Raman, V., Han, W., and Narang, I., Parallel Querying with Non-Dedicated Computers, Proc. of the 31st Int. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases, Trondheim, Norway, 2005; ACM, 2005, pp. 61–72.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Talwadker, A.S., Survey of Performance Issues in Parallel Database Systems, J. Computing Sci. Colleges, 2003, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 5–9.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rahm, E., Parallel Query Processing in Shared Disk Database Systems, ACM SIGMOD Record, 1993, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 32–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xu, Y. and Dandamudi, S.P., Performance Evaluation of a Two-Level Hierarchical Parallel Database System, Proc. of the Int. Conf. Computers and Their Applications, Tempe, Arizona, 1997, pp. 242–247.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang, Y., Chen, G., Sun, G., and Miao, Q., Models of Parallel Computation: A Survey and Classification, Frontiers Comput. Sci. China, 2007, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 156–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kostenetkii, P.S., Simulation of Parallel Database Systems for Computational Clusters, Trudy Vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferentsii “Nauchnyi servis v seti Internet: masshtabiruemost’, parallel’nost’, effektivnost’” (Proc. of the All-Russian Scientific Conf. “Scientific Service in the Internet: Scalability, Concurrency, and Efficiency,” Novorossiisk, 2009), Moscow: Izd. MGU, 2009, pp. 300–304.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kostenetkii, P.S., Lepikhov, A.V., and Sokolinskii, L.B., Technologies of Parallel Database Systems for Hierarchical Multiprocessor Environments, Automation Remote Control, 2007, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 847–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sokolinsky, L.B., Survey of Architectures of Parallel Database Systems, Programming Comput. Software, 2004, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 337–346.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.South Ural State UniversityChelyabinskRussia

Personalised recommendations