Advertisement

Programming and Computer Software

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 41–47 | Cite as

Ensuring portability of software

  • D. V. SilakovEmail author
  • A. V. Khoroshilov
Article

Abstract

The paper is devoted to the problem of portability of applications between different software-hardware platforms. A survey of approaches to solving this problem is given, and analysis of their advantages and disadvantages is presented. Application domains of the existing approaches are discussed.

Keywords

Virtual Machine Common Object Request Broker Architecture Binary File Virtual Machine Monitor Portable Software 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Mooney, J.D., Bringing Portability to the Software Process, Technical Report TR 97-1, Dept. of Statistics and Computer Science, West Virginia Univ., Morgantown, WV, 1997.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sommerville, I., Software Engineering, Addison Wesley, 2006, 8th ed.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wikipedia, Software Engineering, IBM System/370. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System/370.
  4. 4.
    Wine—Open Source Implementation of the Windows API. http://www.winehq.org/.
  5. 5.
    Borland’s Net Loss Disaster, Forum “Borland.public.delphi.non-technical,” Archive of the Discussion List, August 2005. http://coding.derkeiler.com/pdf/Archive/Delphi/Borland.public.delphi.nontechnical/2005-08/msg01903.pdf.
  6. 6.
    Slobojan, R., Tasktop 1.3: Support Added for Firefox and Linux, InfoQueue News, 2008, November 12. http://www.infoq.com/news/2008/11/tasktop-13.
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Yashchenko, A., 64-bit Processors, 3DNews, 2003, August 7. http://www.3dnews.ru/cpu/cpu-64/index2.htm.
  9. 9.
    Cygwin—Linux-like Environment for Windows. http://www.cygwin.com/.
  10. 10.
    Popek, G.J. and Goldberg, R.P., Formal Requirements for Virtualizable Third Generation Architectures, Commun. ACM, July 1974, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 412–421.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kasperski, K., Hardware Virtualization and Emulation “without Brakes.” http://www.insidepro.com/kk/159/159r.shtml.
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Zabaljauregio, M., Hardware Assisted Virtualization. Intel Virtualization Technology, Buesnos Aires, June 2008. http://linux.linti.unlp.edu.ar/kernel/wiki/images/f/f1/Vtx.pdf.
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Barham, P., Dragovic, B., Fraser, K., Hand, S., Harris, T., Ho, A., Neugebarger, R., Pratt, I., and Warfield, A., Xen and the Art of Virtualization, Proc. of the 19th Symp. on Operating Systems principles, October 2003.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Magenheimer, D.J. and Christian, T.W., vBlades: Optimized Paravirtualization for the Itanium Processor Family, Proc. of the 3d Virtual Machine Research & Technology Symp., May 2004, pp. 73–82, USENIX.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Linuxgym Teaching System. http://www.linuxgym.com/.
  19. 19.
    Dahm, T., Browser Compatibility Tutorial. http://www.netmechanic.com/products/Browser-Tutorial.shtml.
  20. 20.
    Browser Tests, Services and Compatibility Test Suites, Smashing Magazine, October 2007. http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2007/10/02/browser-tests-servicesandcompatibility-test-suites/.
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
    Margolis, B. and Sharpe, J., SOA for the Business Developer: Concepts, BPEL, and SCA, MC Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of System ProgrammingRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations