Advertisement

Gravitation and Cosmology

, 15:327 | Cite as

Quantization of massive second- and third-rank antisymmetric tensor fields in curved space

  • E. N. KirillovaEmail author
Article
  • 47 Downloads

Abstract

We consider massive second- and third-rank antisymmetric tensor fields in arbitrary four-dimensional curved space-time. We perform quantization of these models and evaluation of the effective actions. The massive theories of antisymmetric tensor fields do not possess gauge invariance, which is inherent to massless antisymmetric models. To evaluate the effective actions, we restore gauge invariance in massive theories with the help of the Stückelberg multistep procedure. The result is presented in terms of d’Alembertians acting on a scalar, vector, second- and third-rank antisymmetric tensor fields.

PACS numbers

03.70.+k 04.62.+v 11.15.-q 

References

  1. 1.
    S. Deser, Phys. Rev. 178, 1931 (1969).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Kalb and P. Ramond, Phys. Rev. D 9, 2273 (1974).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Cremmer and J. Sherk, Nucl. Phys. B 72, 117 (1974).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y. Nambu, Phys. Rep. C 23, 250 (1976).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Rohm and E. Witten, Ann. Phys. 170, 454 (1986); H. S. Li and K. T. Mahanthappa, Phys. Rev. D 46, 36 631 (1992); N. R. F. Braga and C. F. L. Godinho, Phys. Lett. B 570, 111 (2003); G. Savvidy, J. Phys. A 42, 065403 (2009).CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Di Vecchia, M. Frau, A. Lerda, and A. Liccardo, Nucl. Phys. B 565, 397 (2000).zbMATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. Cremmer, B. Julia, and J. Sherk, Phys. Lett. B 76, 409 (1978); E. Cremmer, J. Sherk, and S. Ferrara, Phys. Lett. B 74, 61 (1978); E. Cremmer and B. Julia, Nucl. Phys. B 159, 141 (1979).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. S. Fradkin and M. A. Vasiliev, Phys. Lett. B 85, 47 (1979); Lett. Nuovo Cimento, 25, 79 (1979); B. de Wit, J. W. van Holten, and A. van Proeyen, Nucl. Phys. B 155, 530 (1979);M. Sophius, K. Stelle, and P. West, Phys. Lett. B 92, 123 (1980); Nucl. Phys. B 173, 127 (1980); A. Aurilia, H. Nicolai, and P. K. Townsend, Nucl. Phys. B 176, 509 (1980); H. Nicolai and P. K. Townsend, Phys. Lett. B 98, 257 (1981); S. Deser, P. K. Townsend, and W. Siegel, Nucl. Phys. B 184, 333 (1981); M. Sophius and P.West, Phys. Lett. B 105, 353 (1981); E. Bergshoeff and E. Sezgin, Phys. Lett. B 292, 87 (1992); R. D’Auria and S. Ferrara, Phys. Lett. B 606, 211 (2005); S.M. Kuzenko, J. High Energy Phys. 01, 041 (2005).zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    I. L. Buchbinder and S. M. Kuzenko, Ideas and Methods of Supersymmetry and Supergravity (IOP Publishing Ltd., Bristol and Philadelphia, 1995, 1998).zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. Di Vecchia and G. Veneziano, Nucl. Phys. B 171, 253 (1980).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. Hata, T. Kugo, and N. Ohta, Nucl. Phys. B 178, 527 (1981).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Aurilia, Y. Takahashi and P. K. Townsend, Phys. Lett. B 95, 265 (1980); J. Hosek and G. Ripka, Z. Phys. A 354, 177 (1996).CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Lusher, Phys. Lett. B 78, 465 (1978); A. Aurilia, D. Christodoulou, and F. Ledovini, Phys. Lett. B 73, 429 (1978); A. Aurilia, Phys. Lett. B 81, 203 (1979); C. Csaki, L. Randall, W. Skiba, and R. Leigh, Phys. Lett. B 387, 791 (1996); W.-H. Huang, J. High Energy Phys. 0806, 006 (2008).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    N. Lehto, H. B. Nielsen, and M. Ninomiya, Phys. Lett. B 115, 129 (1982); P. Orland, Nucl. Phys. B 205, 107 (1982).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. A. Saharian, Class. Quant. Grav. 15, 1951 (1998); J. E. Kim, B. Kyae, and H. M. Lee, Nucl. Phys. B 613, 306 (2001); C. P. Burgess, C. Nunez, F. Quevedo, G. Tasinato, and I. Zavala, J. High Energy Phys. 0308, 056 (2003); E. J. Chun, H. B. Kim, and Y. Kim, J. High Energy Phys. 0503, 036 (2005).zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    V. I. Ogievetsky and I. V. Polubarinov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 4, 156 (1967).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    E. Sezgin and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Phys. Rev. D 22, 301 (1980).CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. J. Duff and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Phys. Lett. B 94, 179 (1980); D. Z. Freedman and P. K. Townsend, Nucl. Phys. B 177, 282 (1981); S. Deser and E.Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 178, 491 (1981); W. Siegel, Phys. Lett. B 103, 107 (1981); W. Mecklenburg and L. Mizrachi, Phys. Rev. D 29, 1709 (1984); A. S. Schwarz and Yu. S. Tyupkin, Nucl. Phys. B 242, 436 (1984); M. T. Grisaru, N. K. Nielsen, W. Siegel, and D. Zanon, Nucl. Phys. B 247, 157 (1984); E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 162, 31 (1985); V. O. Rivelles and L. Sandoval, Jr. Rev. Bras. Fis. 21, 374 (1991); G. Bandelloni and A. Blasi, Class. Quantum Grav. 10, 1249 (1993).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    I. L. Buchbinder and S. M. Kuzenko, Nucl. Phys. B 308, 162 (1988).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Kobayashi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 88, 1231 (1992); S. Deguchi and Y. Kokubo, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 17, 503 (2002); F. Bastianelli, P. Benincasa, and S. Giombi, J. High Energy Phys. 0504, 010 (2005); 0510, 114 (2005).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. Aurilia and E. Spalucci, Quantum Effects of a Massive 3-Form Coupled to a Dirac Field, hepth/0402104v2.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    I. L. Buchbinder, E. N. Kirillova, and N. G. Pletnev, Phys. Rev. D 78, 084024 (2008).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    I. L. Buchbinder, G. de Berredo-Peixoto, and I. L. Shapiro, Phys. Lett. B 649, 454 (2007).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    I. A. Batalin and G. A. Vilkovisky, Phys. Rev. D 28, 2567 (1983); Erratum, Phys. Rev. D 30, 508 (1984).CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    A. S. Schwarz, Lett. Math. Phys. 2, 247 (1978); Commun. Math. Phys.67, 1 (1979); A. S. Schwarz and Yu. S. Tyupkin, Nucl. Phys. B 242, 436 (1984).zbMATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    P. K. Townsend, Phys. Lett. B 88, 97 (1979).CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    W. Siegel, Phys. Lett. B 93, 170 (1980).CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    C. B. Kim and H. Y. Lee, Phys. Lett. B 131, 99 (1983).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    “FP-ghosts themselves require gauge invariance and one must repeat the covariant quantization for them”([28]).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    T. Kimura, J. Phys. A 13, L353 (1980); J. Shechter, Phys. Rev. D 25, 601 (1982); S. Ansoldi, A. Aurilia, and E. Spalucci, Phys. Rev. D 10, 025008 (2001).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Theoretical PhysicsTomsk State Pedagogical UniversityTomskRussia

Personalised recommendations