Advertisement

Water Resources

, Volume 46, Issue 6, pp 883–893 | Cite as

Investigation of the Relationship between Sediment Graph and Hydrograph of Flood Events (Case Study: Gharachay River Tributaries, Arak, Iran)

  • Javad VarvaniEmail author
  • Mohammad Reza KhaleghiEmail author
  • Vahid GholamiEmail author
WATER RESOURCES AND THE REGIME OF WATER BODIES
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

In the comprehensive management of watersheds, the knowledge of the sedimentation process in flood conditions is considered as an important and challenging issue. The aim of this study was to investigate the hysteretic behavior of suspended sediment concentration (C) in relation to the discharge. To achieve this goal in Gharachay river tributaries, eleven flood events recorded in 2004–2005 and 2006–2007 were selected. Suspended sediment sampling carried out by using the USDH-48 sampler in three cross-sections. By determination of C in laboratory and separation of base flow of flood hydrograph, sediment graph of each flood produced and main parameters of each hydrograph and sediment graph were investigated. In addition, concurrent concentration-discharge graph (CQ) of each flood events was depicted and the shape of each CQ loops related to C during rising and recession limb of the hydrograph. The results showed that coefficient of variations (Cv) of C in selected events varied from 12.58 to 119.87%, while the minimum and maximum C of the mentioned floods were 191 to 387 and 800 to 4800 mg/L, respectively. The maximum amount of C was about 15 700 mg/L which belongs to the flood events with Cv of 76%. Comparison with the sediment graph the Cv of floods hydrograph was low (5.4 to 59.2%). Investigation of correlation matrix between flood hydrograph and sediment graph parameters shows that there were no meaningful relationships between selected parameters. However, CQ relations during single flood event and form of its loop show that in most cases the rising limb of hydrograph has the high amount of sediment concentration, which reflects the closeness of sediment sources to the basin outlet.

Keywords:

Sediment concentration Hydrograph Flood Water discharge Sediment graph 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to gratitude the Khorasan Razavi Regional Water Company for providing and preprocessing the data on rainfall and flood hydrograph.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Mohammad Reza Khaleghi, Associate Professor, Torbat-e-Jam Branch, Islamic Azad University, Torbat-e-Jam, Iran.

Corresponding author e-mail: drmrkhaleghi@gmail.com; Tel: +989156418383; Fax: +985282210080; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3611-3755.

Vahid Gholami, Department of Range and Watershed Management and Dept. of Water Eng. and Environment, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Guilan, Sowmeh Sara, 1144, Guilan, Iran.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Arora, M., Kumar, A., Kumar, N., and Malhotra, J., Assessment of suspended sediment concentration and load from a large Himalayan glacier, Hydrol. Res., 2013, vol. 45, pp. 292–306.  https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2013.129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bečvář, M., Sediment load and suspended sediment concentration prediction, Soil Water Res., 2006, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 23–31.  https://doi.org/10.17221/6502-SWR CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chalov, S., Golosov, V., Tsyplenkov, A., Theuring, P., Zakerinejad, R., Märker, M., and Samokhin, M.A., A toolbox for sediment budget research in small catchments, Geogr. Environ. Sustainability, 2017, vol. 10, pp. 43–68.  https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2017-10-4-43-68 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chalov, S., Tsyplenkov, A., Pietron, J., Chalova, A., Shkolnyi, D., Jarsjo, J. and Marker, M., Sediment transport in headwaters of a volcanic catchment—Kamchatka Peninsula case study, Front. Earth Sci., 2017, vol. 11, pp. 565–578.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-016-0632-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cohen, H. and Laronne, J.B., High rates of sediment transport by flashfloods in the Southern Judean Desert, Israel, Hydrol. Processes, 2005, vol. 19, pp. 1687–1702.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5630 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Crutzen, P.J., The Anthropocene, in Earth System Science in the Anthropocene, Ehlers E., Krafft T., Eds., Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2006.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cui, H. and Singh, V., Suspended sediment concentration in Open Channels Using Tsallis Entropy, J. Hydrol. Eng., 2014, vol. 19, pp. 966–977. doi HE.1943-5584.0000865 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)
  8. 8.
    Dai, Z.J., Chu, A., Li, W.H., Li, J.F., and Wu, H.L., Has suspended sediment concentration near the mouth bar of the Yangtze (Changjiang) Estuary been declining in recent years?, J. Coastal Res., 2013, vol. 29, pp. 809–818.  https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-11-00200.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dunne, T., Sediment yield and land use in tropical catchments, J. Hydrol., 1979, vol. 42, pp. 281–300.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(79)90052-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eder, A., Strauss, P., Krueger, T., and Quinton, J.N., Comparative calculation of suspended sediment loads with respect to hysteresis effects (in the Petzenkirchen catchment, Austria), J. Hydrol., 2010, vol. 389, pp. 168–176.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.05.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Feiznia, S., Resistance of rocks to erosion in different climates of Iran, Iran. J. Nat. Resour., 1995, vol. 47, pp. 95–116.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gholami, V., Booij, M.J., Tehrani, E.N., and Hadian, M.A., Spatial soil erosion estimation using an artificial neural network (ANN) and field plot data, Catena, 2018, vol. 163, pp. 210–218.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.12.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gholzom, E.H. and Gholami, V., A comparison between natural forests and reforested lands in terms of runoff generation potential and hydrologic response (case study: Kasilian watershed), Soil Water Res., 2012, vol. 7, pp. 166–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gilja, G., Bekić, D., and Oskoruš, D., Processing of suspended sediment concentration measurements on Drava River, Int. Symp. Water Manage. Hydraul. Eng., 2009, pp. 181–191.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Güldal, V. and Müftüoğlu, R., 2D Unit Sediment Graph Theory, J. Hydrol. Eng., 2001, vol. 6, pp. 132–140.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2001)6:2(132)
  16. 16.
    Hair, J.R., Joseph, F., Rolph, A.E., Thatham, L., Black, R., and Williams, C., Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice Hall Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hashemyan, F., Khaleghi, M.R., and Kamyar, M., Combination of HEC-HMS and HEC-RAS models in GIS in order to simulate flood (Case study: Khoshke Rudan river in Fars province, Iran), Res. J. Recent Sci., 2015, vol. 4, pp. 122–127.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Horowitz, A.J. and Elrick, K.A., The relation of stream sediment surface area, grain size, and composition to trace element chemistry, Appl. Geochem., 1987, vol. 2, pp. 437–451.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-2927(87)90027-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hudson, P.F., Event sequence and sediment exhaustion in the lower Panuco basin, Mexico, Catena, 2003, vol. 52, pp. 57–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(02)00145-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Minella, J.P.G., Merten, G.H., Reichert, J.M., and Clarke, R.T., Estimating suspended sediment concentrations from turbidity measurements and the calibration problem, Hydrol. Process., 2008, vol. 22, pp. 1819–1830.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6763 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kaffas, K. and Hrissanthou, V., Estimate of continuous sediment graphs in a basin, using a composite mathematical model, Environ. Processes, 2015, vol. 2, pp. 361–378.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-015-0069-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Karthe, D., Chalov, S., Moreido, V., Pashkina, M., Romanchenko, A., Batbayar, G., Kalugin, A., Westphal, K., Malsy, M., and Martina Flörke, M., Assessment of runoff, water and sediment quality in the Selenga River basin aided by a web-based geo-service, Water Resour., 2017, vol. 44, pp. 399–416.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807817030113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kasai, M., Brierley, G.J., Page, M.J., Marutami, T., and Trustrum, N.A., Impacts of land use change on patterns of sediment flux in Weraamaia catchment, New Zealand, Catena, 2005, vol. 64, pp. 27–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2005.06.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Khaleghi, M.R., Gholami, V., Ghodusi, J., and Hosseini, H., Efficiency of the geomorphologic instantaneous unit hydrograph method in flood hydrograph simulation, Catena, 2011, vol. 87, pp. 163–171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2011.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Khaleghi, M.R., Ghodusi, J., and Ahmadi, H., Regional analysis using the geomorphologic instantaneous unit hydrograph (GIUH) method, Soil & Water Res., 2014, vol. 9, pp. 25–30.  https://doi.org/10.17221/33/2012-SWR CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Khaleghi, M.R. and Varvani, J., Simulation of relationship between river discharge and sediment yield in the semi-arid river watersheds, Acta Geophysica, 2018, vol. 66, pp. 109–119.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-018-0110-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Khaleghi, M.R., Varvani, J., Sediment rating curve parameters relationship with watershed, characteristics in the semiarid river watersheds, J. Arab J. Sci. Eng., 2018b, pp. 1−13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-018-3092-7
  28. 28.
    Kimoto, A., Uschida, T., Mizuyama, T., and Changhua, L., Influences of human activities on sediment discharge from devastated weathered granite hills of southern China: effects of 4-year elimination of human activities, Catena, 2002, vol. 48, pp. 217–233.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(02)00029-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kronvang, B., Laubel, A., and Grant, R., Suspended sediment and particulate phosphorus transport and delivery pathways in an arable catchment, Gelbaek stream, Denmark, Hydrol. Processes, 1997, vol. 11, pp. 627–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Krueger, T., Quinton, J.N., Freer, J., Macleod, C.J., Bilotta, G.S., Brazier, R.E., Butler, P., and Haygarth, P.M., Uncertainties in data and models to describe event dynamics of agricultural sediment and phosphorus transfer, J. Environ. Qual., 2009, vol. 38, pp. 1137–1148.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2008.0179 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kundzewicz, Z.W., Searching for change in hydrological data, Hydrol. Sci. J., 2004, vol. 49, pp. 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lenzi, M.A. and Marchi, L., Suspended sediment load during floods in a small stream of the Dolomites (northeastern Italy), Catena, 2000, vol. 39, pp. 267–282.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(00)00079-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mahdavi, M., Applied Hydrol., Univ. Tehran Press, Tehran, 2004, vol. 2, 5th Edition.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Maidment, D.R., Handbook of Hydrol., New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Martin, C.E. and McCulloch, M.T., Nd–Sr isotopic and trace element geochemistry of river sediments and soils in a fertilized catchment, New South Wales, Australia, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 1999, vol. 63, pp. 287–305.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00308-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Meybeck, M., River basin under Anthropocene conditions, in Science and Integrated Basin Management, Von Bodungen, B., Turner, K., Eds., Berlin: Dahlem Univ. Press, 2001, pp. 275–294.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Meybeck, M., Global analysis of river systems: from Earth system controls to Anthropocene syndromes, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci., 2003, vol. 358, pp. 1935–1955.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1379 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ministry of Agriculture Jihad–Agriculture Organization of Markazi Provinces, 2002.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Montserrat, S., Guillaume, N., Gusman, C., and Francesc, G., Assessment of suspended C measurement error in relation to particle size, using continuous sensors in a small mountain stream (Vallcebre catchments, Eastern Pyrenees), Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie, 2012, vol. 56, pp. 99–113.  https://doi.org/10.1127/0372-8854/2012/S-00106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Morgan, R.P.C., Soil Erosion and Conservation, New York: Longman Science and Technical/Wiley, 1995, 2nd Edition.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Morris, G. and Fan, H.J., Reservoir Sedimentation Handbook, Prentice Hall press, 1998.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nussbaum Kayla, E., A Temporal Analysis of Suspended Sediment Concentration Changes in a Proglacial Meltwater Stream, Linnébreen, Svalbard, Environmental Studies Honors Projects, 2013, Paper 11.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Owens, P.N. and Walling, D.E., The phosphorous content of fluvial sediment in rural and industrialized river basins, Water Res., 2002, vol. 36, pp. 685–701.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00247-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Pavelsky, T.M. and Smith, L.C., Remote sensing of suspended sediment concentration, flow velocity, and lake recharge in the Peace-Athabasca Delta, Canada, Water Resour. Res., 2009, vol. 45, pp. 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007424 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pietroń, J., Jarsjö, J., Romanchenko, A.O., and Chalov, S.R., Model analyses of the contribution of in-channel processes to sediment concentration hysteresis loops, J. Hydrol., 2015, vol. 522, pp. 576–589.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.05.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Rovira, R. and Batalla, J., Temporal distribution of suspended sediment transport in a Mediterranean basin: The Lower Tordera (NE SPAIN), Geomorphol., 2006, vol. 79, pp. 58–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.09.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sil, B.S. and Choudhury, P., Water-sediment flow models for river reaches sediment related pollution control, J. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2012, vol. 54, pp. 331–344.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sadeghi, S.H.R. and Singh, J.K., Development of a Synthetic Sediment Graph Using Hydrological Data, J. Agric. Sci. Technol, 2005, vol. 7, pp. 69–77.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Singh, V., Cui, H., and Byrd, A., Sediment Graphs Based on Entropy Theory, J. Hydrol. Eng., 2014, vol. 20, pp. 1–9. C4014004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584. 0001068
  50. 50.
    Tananaev, N.I., Hysteresis effect in the seasonal variations in the relationship between water discharge and suspended load in rivers of permafrost zone in Siberia and Far East, Water Resour., 2012, vol. 39, pp. 648–656.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807812060073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Varis, O. and Vakkilainen, P., China’s 8 challenges to water resources management in the first quarter of the 21st century, Geomorphol., 2001, vol. 41, pp. 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Walling, D.E., Owens, P.N., Carter, J., Leeks, G.J.L., Lewis, S., Meharg, A.A., and Wright, J., Storage of sediment-associated nutrients and contaminants in river channel and floodplain systems, Appl. Geochem., 2003, vol. 18, pp. 195–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Walling, D.E., Tracing suspended sediment sources in catchments and river systems. Sci. Total Environ., 2005, vol. 344, pp. 159–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Walling, D.E., Human impact on land–ocean sediment transfer by the world’s rivers, Geomorphol., 2006, vol. 79, pp. 192–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Williams, J.R., A sediment graph model based on the instantaneous unit sediment graph, Water Resour. Res., 1978, vol. 14, pp. 659–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Williams, G.P., C versus water discharge during single hydrologic events in rivers, J. Hydrol., 1989, vol. 111, pp. 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Williams, J.R., A sediment graph model based on an instantaneous unit sediment graph, Water Resour. Res., 2010, vol. 14, pp. 659–664.  https://doi.org/10.1029/WR014i004p00659 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Zhang, S.R., Lu, X.X., Higgit, D.L., Chen, C.T.A., Han, J.T., and Sun, H.G., Recent changes of water discharge and sediment load in the Zhujiang (Pearl River) Basin, China; Global Planet. Change, 2008, vol. 60, pp. 365–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2007.04 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Arak Branch, Islamic Azad UniversityArakIran
  2. 2.Torbat-e-Jam Branch, Islamic Azad UniversityTorbat-e-JamIran
  3. 3.Department of Range and Watershed Management, University of Guilan, Faculty of Natural ResourcesSowmeh SaraIran

Personalised recommendations