Advertisement

Water Resources

, Volume 45, Issue 6, pp 827–838 | Cite as

A Model of Mixing of Four River Runoff Recharge Sources Using Hydrochemical Tracers in the Problem of Hydrograph Separation

  • T. S. GubarevaEmail author
  • B. I. Gartsman
  • N. V. Solopov
Water Resources and the Regime of Water Bodies
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

Methods for the analysis of the formation of river water chemistry based on mixing models are discussed. An analytical solution for a mixing model of four recharge sources is given along with the results of its adaptation based on the materials of hydrochemical and hydrological observations over 2013 and 2014 in drainage basins in Primorski Krai. The analysis and calculations revealed four components of river recharge in these years: rainwater, two types of subsoil water, and groundwater, the latter forming the base runoff. The estimates of the mixing model with four sources and its tests showed a high quality of modeling.

Keywords

river drainage basin runoff sources hydrochemical tracers mixing model hydrograph separation method of principal components 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Boldeskul, A.G., Shamov, V.V., Gartsman, B.I., and Kozhevnikova, N.K., Ionic composition of the genetic types of water in a small river basin: stationary studies in the Central Sikhote Alin, Tikhookean. Geol., 2014, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 90–101.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Voronkov, P.P., Regularities in the formation process and zonation of water chemistry in local runoff, Tr. Gl. Geofiz. Obs. im. A.I. Voeikova, 1963, no. 102, pp. 43–119.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gartsman, B.I. and Shamov, V.V., Field studies of runoff formation in the Far East Region based on modern observational instruments, Water Resour., 2015, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 766–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gubareva, T.S., Boldeskul, A.G., Gartsman, B.I., and Shamov, V.V., Analysis of natural tracers and genetic runoff components in mixing models: case study of small basins in Primor’e, Water Resour., 2016, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 629–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gubareva, T.S., Gartsman, B.I., Shamov, V.V., Boldeskul, A.G., and Kozhevnikova, N.K., Genetic disintegration of the runoff hydrograph, Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol., 2015, no. 3, pp. 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kudelin, B.I., Printsipy regional’noi otsenki estestvennykh resursov podzemnykh vod (Principles of Regional Assessment of Natural Groundwater Resources), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1960.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Popov, O.V., Podzemnoe pitanie rek (Groundwater Recharge of Rivers), Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1968.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shamov, V.V., Gartsman, B.I., Gubareva, T.S., Kozhevnikova, N.K., and Boldeskul, A.G., Experimental studies of runoff genetic structure with the use of chemical tracers: problem formulation, Inzhen. Izysk., 2013, no. 1, pp. 60–69.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Edel’shtein, K.K. and Smakhtina, O.Yu., Genetic structure of river runoff and a chemical–statistical method to identify its elements, Vodn. Resur., 1991, no. 5, pp. 5–20.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yakovleva, A.N., A model of vegetation pattern at the Verkhneussuriysky Biogeocenotic Station, Russ. J. Ecol., 2010, no. 4, pp. 307–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barthold, F.K., Turner, B.L., Elsenbeer, H., and Zimmermann, A., A hydrochemical approach to quantify the role of return flow in a surface flow-dominated catchment, Hydrol. Processes, 2017, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1018–1033. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/hyp.11083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bickle, M.J., Chapman, H.J., Bunbury, J., et al., The relative contributions of silicate and carbonate rocks to riverine Sr fluxes in the head waters of the Ganges, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 2005, vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 2221–2240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Boldeskul, A.G., Shamov, V.V., Gartsman, B.I., et al., Chemical composition of geographical types of the small river basin waters (Central Sikhote-Alin Mountains, Pacific Asia), Water Resour., 2016, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 145–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Christophersen, N. and Hopper, R.P., Multivariate analysis of stream water chemical data: the use of principal component analysis for the end-member mixing problem, Water Resour. Res., 1992, vol. 28, no. Iss. 1, pp. 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Christophersen, N., Neal, C., Hooper, R.P., and Voght, R.D., Modelling stream water chemistry of soilwater end-members—a step towards second-generation acidification models, J. Hydrol., 1990, vol. 116, nos. 1–4, pp. 307–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Correa, A., Windhorst, D., Tetzlaff, D., et al., Temporal dynamics in dominant runoff sources and flow paths in the Andrean Paramo, Water Resour. Res., 2017, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 5998–6017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dewalle, D.R., Swistock, B.R., and Sharpe, W.E., Three-component tracer model for stormflow on a small Appalachian forested catchment, J. Hydrol., 1988, vol. 104, nos. 1–4, pp. 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hooper, R.P., Diagnostic tools for mixing models of stream water chemistry, Wat. Resour. Res., 2003, vol. 39, no. 3, 1055. doi 10.1029/2002WR001528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hooper, R.P., Christophersen, N., and Peters, N., Modeling streamwater chemistry as a mixture of soilwater end-members—an application to the Panola mounting catchment, Georgia, USA, J. Hydrol., 1990, vol. 116, nos. 1–4, pp. 321–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee, E.S. and Krothe, N.C., A four-component mixing model for water in a karst terrain in south-central Indiana, USA. Using solute concentration and stable isotopes as tracers, Chemical Geol., 2001, vol. 179, nos. 1–4, pp. 129–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu, F., Williams, M.W., and Caine, N., Source waters and flow paths in alpine catchment, Colorado Front Range, United States, Water Resour. Res., 2004, vol. 40, no. 9, W09401. doi 10.1029/2004WR003076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ogunkoya, O.O. and Jenkins, A., Analysis of storm hydrograph and flow pathways using a three-component hydrograph separation model, J. Hydrol., 1993, nos. 1–4, pp. 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pinder, G.F. and Jones, J.F., Determination of the ground-water component of peak discharge from the chemistry of total runoff, Water Resour. Res., 1969, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 438–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. S. Gubareva
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • B. I. Gartsman
    • 1
    • 2
  • N. V. Solopov
    • 3
  1. 1.Water Problems InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Pacific Institute of Geography, Far East BranchRussian Academy of SciencesVladivostokRussia
  3. 3.RostelekomVladivostokRussia

Personalised recommendations