Water Resources

, Volume 45, Supplement 1, pp 122–127 | Cite as

Assessment of the Long-Term Hydrological Forecast Skill Evolution across Lead-Times within the Ensemble Streamflow Prediction Framework

  • V. M. MoreidoEmail author


Long-term or seasonal forecasting is crucial for the management of large water systems. Advances in catchment hydrology, such as mathematical models of catchment processes, are proven to be capable of creating reliable streamflow forecasting systems. In this study, the limits of predictability of streamflow in a snowmelt-dominated river basin are examined and a new illustration of the forecast efficiency across different issue dates and lead times—the so-called “forecastability map”—is demonstrated.


long-term hydrological forecasting forecast skill hydrological predictability 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bulygina, O.N., Razuvaev, V.N., and Aleksandrova, T.M., Description of daily air temperature and precipitation data set from Russian meteorological stations and from some meteorological stations over the former USSR territory (TTTR) 2017. Retrieved from Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dong, Chunyu, Remote sensing, hydrological modeling and in situ observations in snow cover research: A review. J. Hydrol., 2018, vol. 561, pp. 573–583. Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gelfan, A.N., Moreydo, V.M., Motovilov, Y.G., and Solomatine, D.P., Long-term ensemble forecast of snowmelt inflow into the Cheboksary Reservoir under two different weather scenarios, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 2018, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 2073–2089. Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kuchment, L.S. and Gelfan, A.N., Long-term ensemble forecast of snowmelt runoff with the help of the physics-based models of runoff generation. Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol., 2007, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 126–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kuchment, L.S. and Gelfan, A.N., A study of effectiveness of the ensemble long-term forecasts of spring floods issued with physically based models of the river runoff formation. Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol., 2009, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 100–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lettenmaier, D.P., and Waddle Terry R. Forecasting Seasonal Snowmelt Runoff: Summary of Experience with Two Models Applied to Three Cascade Mountain, WADrainages, 1978, Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Motovilov, Y., Gottschalk, L., Engeland, K., and Rodhe, A. Validation of a distributed hydrological model against spatial observations. Agric. For. Meteorol., 1999, vol. 98–99, pp. 257–277. 10.1016/S0168-1923(99)00102-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Motovilov, Yu.G., Hydrological simulation of river basins at different spatial scales: 1. Generalization and averaging algorithms. Water Resour., 2016, vol. 43(3), pp. 429–437. S0097807816030118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Motovilov, Yu.G., Hydrological simulation of river basins at different spatial scales: 1. Generalization and averaging algorithms, Water Resour., 2016, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 429–437. S0097807816030118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nash, J.E. and Sutcliffe, J.V., River flow forecasting through conceptual models, part—A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol., 1970, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 282–290. Scholar
  11. 11.
    Report of a Workshop on Predictability & Limits-To-Prediction in Hydrologic Systems, 2002, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shukla, S., Sheffield, J., Wood, E.F., and Lettenmaier, D.P., On the sources of global land surface hydrologic predictability, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 2013, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 2781–2796. 10.5194/hess-17-2781-2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Water Problems InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations