Advertisement

Water Resources

, Volume 45, Issue 5, pp 757–766 | Cite as

Organic Trace Components Extractable by Chloroform from Swamp and River Waters in the Middle Ob Basin

  • T. T. Efremova
  • S. P. Efremov
  • G. S. Kalacheva
Hydrochemistry, Hydrobiology: Environmental Aspects

Abstract

For the first time in the Middle Ob Basin, new data of importance for evaluating the quality of swamp and river water were obtained, characterizing the microcomponent composition of extractive organic compounds. More than 150 compounds of natural genesis were identified. The water of oligotrophic and mesotrophic bogs shows widest diversity and maximal, almost equal masses of extractable organic substances, averaging 13357 ng/L. In the water of eutrophic bogs and taiga rivers, this characteristic is five times lower; and that in lakes is lower by more than an order of magnitude. The amount of extractive trace components is closely correlated with the concentration of water-soluble carbon of humic nature. It was established that the natural water of taiga zone identical in terms of the fulvate type differs in the composition of organic trace components and can be grouped into four clusters: (a) water of oligotrophic bogs, (b) water of mesotrophic bogs, (c) river water, and (d) water of eutrophic bogs and bog lakes.

Keywords

bog water taiga rivers organic trace components chromate-mass-spectroscopy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Efremova, T.T., Efremov, S.P., and Melent’eva, N.V., Bog water resources in Russia and estimates of their chemistry, Geogr. Prir. Resur., 1998, no. 2, pp. 79–84.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Efremova, T.T., Sekretenko, O.P., and Efremov, S.P., Determination of the organic carbon content in bog and river waters of the taiga zone based on their optical density, Eurasian Soil Sci., 2014, no. 8, pp. 781–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Inisheva, L.I. and Inishev, N.G., Elements of water balance and hydrochemical characteristic of oligotrophic bogs in the southern taiga subzone of Western Siberia, Water Resour., 2001, no. 4, pp. 371–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kadychagov, P.B., Russkikh, I.V., and Belitskaya, E.A., Organic components in natural waters of the Tom R. basin, Sib. Ekol. Zhurn., 2009, no. 1, pp. 105–112.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lishtvan, I.I., Bazin, E.T., Gamayunov, N.I., and Terent’ev, A.A., Khimiya i fizika torfa (Peat Chemistry and Physics), Moscow: Nedra, 1989.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lozovik, P.A., Geochemical classification of surface waters in humid zone based on their acid–base equilibrium, Water Resour., 2013, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 631–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lozovik, P.A., Morozov, A.K., Zobkov, M.B., Dukhovicheva, T.A., and Osipova, L.A., Allochthonous and autochthonous organic matter in surface waters in Karelia, Water Resour., 2007, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 204–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    MUK 4.1. 663–97. Opredelenie massovoi kontsentratsii organicheskikh soedinenii v vode metodom khromatomass- spektrometrii (Determination of Mass Concentration of Organic Compounds in Water by Chromato-Mass-Spectrometry), Moscow: Minzdrav Rossii, 1997.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Perel’man, A.I. and Kasimov, M.S., Geokhimiya landshafta (Landscape Geochemistry), Moscow: Astreya-2000, 1999.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rasskazov, N.M., Major features of bog water chemistry: case study of the eastern part of the Western Siberia, Izv. TPU, 2005, vol. 308, no. 4, pp. 55–58.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rasskazov, N.M., Turov, Yu.P., and Shvartsev, S.L., Organic component distributions in the natural waters of the Upper Ob Basin by chromate-mass-spectrometry, in Osnovnye problemy okhrany geologicheskoi sredy. Sb. Statei (Major Problems of Environmental Protection. Coll. of Papers), Tomsk: Tomsk. Gos. Univ., 1995, pp. 144–146.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rebrova, O.Yu., Statisticheskii analiz meditsinskikh dannykh. Primenenie paketa prikladnykh programm STATISTICA (Statistical Analysis of Medical Data. The Application of STATISTICA Software Package), Moscow: Media Sfera, 2003.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Savichev, O.G., Vodnye resursy Tomskoi oblasti (Water Resources of Tomsk Oblast), Tomsk: Tomsk. Gos. Univ., 2010.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Savichev, O.G., Background concentrations of substances in river water in the taiga zone of Western Siberia, Vestn. TGU, 2010, no. 334, pp. 169–175.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Serebrennikova, O.V., Strel’nikova, E.B., and Preis, Yu.I., Specifics of lipid composition in the highmoor and lowland peat in the southern Tomsk oblast, Izv. TPU, 2013, vol. 322, no. 3, pp. 77–82.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Khimicheskaya entsiklopediya (Chemical Encyclopedia), Moscow: Sov. Entsikl., 1965, vol. 4.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shvartsev, S.L., Rasskazov, N.M., Sidorenko, T.N., and Zdvizhkov, M.A., Geochemistry of natural water in the area of the Bol’shoe Vasyuganskoe Boloto, in Bol’shoe Vasyuganskoe boloto. Sovremennoe sostoyanie i protsessy razvitiya (Bol’shoe Vasyuganskoe Boloto: Current State and Development processes), Tomsk: Izd. Inst. Opt. Atm., Sib. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2002, pp. 139–149.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Osburn, C.L., Morris, D.P., Thorn, K.A., and Moeller R.E., Chemical and optical changes in freshwater dissolved organic matter exposed to solar radiation, Biogeochem., 2001, vol. 54, pp. 251–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    De Haan, H., Impacts of environmental changes on the biogeochemistry of aquatic humic substances, Hydrobiologia, 1992, vol. 229, pp. 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pennanen, V., Seasonal and spatial distribution of humus fractions in a chain of polyhumic lakes in southern Finland, Hydrobiologia, 1982, vol. 86, pp. 73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. T. Efremova
    • 1
  • S. P. Efremov
    • 1
  • G. S. Kalacheva
    • 2
  1. 1.Sukachev Institute of Forest, Division of Federal Research Center, Krasnoyarsk Scientific Center, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesKrasnoyarskRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Biophysics, Division of Federal Research Center, Krasnoyarsk Scientific Center, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesKrasnoyarskRussia

Personalised recommendations