Water Resources

, Volume 42, Issue 5, pp 721–734 | Cite as

Estimation of peak outflow in dam failure using neural network approach under uncertainty analysis

  • Farhad Hooshyaripor
  • Ahmad Tahershamsi
  • Kourosh Behzadian
Water Resources Development: Economic and Legal Aspects

Abstract

This paper presents two Artificial Neural Network (ANN) based models for the prediction of peak outflow from breached embankment dams using two effective parameters including height and volume of water behind the dam at the time of failure. Estimation of optimal weights and biases in the training phase of the ANN is analysed by two different algorithms including Levenberg—Marquardt (LM) as a standard technique used to solve nonlinear least squares problems and Imperialist Competitive Algorithm (ICA) as a new evolutionary algorithm in the evolutionary computation field. Comparison of the obtained results with those of the conventional approach based on regression analysis shows a better performance of the ANN model trained with ICA. Investigation on the uncertainty band of the models indicated that LM predictions have the least uncertainty band whilst ICA’s have the lowest mean prediction error. More analysis on the models’ uncertainty is conducted by a Monte Carlo simulation in which 1000 randomly generated sets of input data are sampled from the database of historical dam failures. The result of 1000 ANN models which have been analysed with three statistical measures including p-factor, d-factor, and DDR confirms that LM predictions have more limited uncertainty band.

Keywords

dam failure neural network Levenberg—Marquardt Imperialist Competitive Algorithm uncertainty analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abbaspour, K.C., Yang, J., Maximov, I., et al., Modeling hydrology and water quality in the prealpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT, J. Hydrol., 2007, vol. 333, pp. 413–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atashpaz-Gargari, E. and Lucas, C., Imperialist competitive algorithm: An algorithm for optimization inspired by imperialistic competition, IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2007, pp. 4661–4667.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Atashpaz-Gargari, E., Hashemzadeh, F., Rajabioun, R., and Lucas, C., Colonial competitive algorithm: a novel approach for PID controller design in MIMO distillation column process. Int. J. Intelligent Comput. Cybernetics, 2008, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 337–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Babaeyan Amini, A., Nourani, V., and Hakimzadeh, H., Application of artificial intelligence tools to estimate peak outflow from earth dam breach, Int. J. Earth Sci. Eng., 2011, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 243–246.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coleman, S., Andrews, D., and Webby, M.G., Overtopping breaching of noncohesive homogeneous embankments, J. Hydraul. Eng., 2002, vol. 128, no. 9, pp. 829–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coulibaly, P., Anctil, F., and Bobe’e, B., Daily reservoir inflow forecasting using artificial neural networks with stopped training approach, J. Hydrol., 2000, vol. 230, nos. 3–4, pp. 244–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cybenko, G., Approximation by superposition of a sigmoidal function, Math. Cont. Sig. Syst., 1989, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fread, D.L., Some Limitations of Dam-Break Flood Routing Models, Preprint, American Society of Civil Engineers, Fall Convention, St. Louis, Mo, 1981.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Froehlich, D.C., Peak outflow from breached embankment dam, J. Wat. Res. Plann. Manage., 1995, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 90–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Froehlich, D., Embankment Dam Breach Parameters and Their Uncertainties, J. Hydraul. Eng., 2008, vol. 134, no. 12, pp. 1708–1721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gupta, S. and Singh, V., Discussion of “Enhanced Predictions for Peak Outflow from Breached Embankment Dams”, Thornton, Ch.I., Pierce, M.W., and Abt, S.R., Eds., J. Hydrol. Eng., 2012, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 463–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hooshyaripor, F. and Tahershamsi, A., Comparing the Performance of Neural Networks for Predicting Peak Outflow from Breached Embankments when Back Propagation Algorithms meet Evolutionary Algorithms, Int. J. Hydraul. Eng., 2012, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hooshyaripor, F., Tahershamsi, A., and Golian, S., Application of copula method and nueral networks for predicting peak outflow from breached embankments, J. Hydro-Environ. Res., 2014, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 292–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hosseini Nasab, E., Khezri, M., Khodamoradi, S.M., and Atashpaz Gargari, E., An application of Imperialist Competitive Algorithm to Simulation of Energy Demand Based on Economic Indicators: Evidence from Iran, Europ. J. Sci. Res., 2010, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 495–506.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kaveh, A. and Talatahari, S., Optimum design of skeletal structures using imperialist Competitive Algorithm, Comput. Structures, 2010, vol. 88, no. 21–22, pp. 1220–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Levenberg, K., A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares, Quart. Appl. Math., 1944, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 164–168.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marce, R., Comerma, M., Garcia, J.C., and Armengol, J., A neuro-fuzzy modeling tool to estimate fluvial nutrient loads in watersheds under time-varying human impact, Limnol. Oceanogr., 2004, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 342–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marquardt, D.W., An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters, J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math., 1963, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 431–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nazari-Shirkouhi, S., Eivazy, H., Ghodsi, R., Rezaie, K., and Atashpaz-Gargari, E., Solving the integrated product mix–outsourcing problem by a novel meta–heuristic algorithm: imperialist competitive algorithm, Expert Systems Appl., 2010, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 7615–7626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Noori, R., Khakpour, A., Omidvar, B., and Farokhnia, A., Comparison of ANN and principal component analysis-multivariate linear regression models for predicting the river flow based on developed discrepancy ratio statistic, Expert Systems Appl., 2010, vol. 37, pp. 5856–5862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Noori, R., Karbassi, A.R., Mehdizadeh, H., and Sabahi, M.S., A framework development for predicting the longitudinal dispersion coefficient in natural streams using artificial neural network, Environ. Prog. Sustain. En., 2011, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 439–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Noori, R. and Hooshyaripor, F., Effective prediction of scour downstream of ski-jump buckets using artificial neural networks, Wat. Res., 2014, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 8–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nourani, V., Hakimzadeh, H., and Babaeyan Amini, A., Implementation of artificial neural network technique in the simulation of dam breach hydrograph, J. Hydroinformatics, 2012, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 478–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pierce, M.W., Thornton, C.I., and Abt, S.R., Predicting peak outflow from breached embankment dams, J. Hydrol. Eng., 2010, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 338–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Singh, V.P. and Scarlatos, P.D., Analysis of gradual earth dam failure, J. Hydraul. Eng., 1988, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Taher-Shamsi, A., Shetty, A.V., and Ponce, V.M., Embankment Dam Breaching: Geometry and Peak Outflow Charactristic, Dam Eng., 2003, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 73–87.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tahershamsi, A. and Sheikholeslami, R., Optimization to identify Muskingum Model parameters using imperialist competitive algorithm, Int. J. Optim. Civil Eng., 2011, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 473–482.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tingsanchali, T. and Chinnarasri, C., Numerical modelling of dam failure due to flow overtopping, Hydrol. Sci. J., 2001, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wahl, T.L., Prediction of Embankment Dam Breach Parameters, A Literature Review and Needs Assessment, Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of the Interior, Denver, 60, Rep. no. DSO–98–004, 1998.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wahl, T.L., Uncertainty of predictions of embankment dam breach parameters, J. Hydraul. Eng., 2004, vol. 130, no. 5, pp. 389–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Willemsen, P.G., Bailer, C.A.L., and Kaempf, T.A., ICAP-Variability-Alerts Joint Working Group Meeting, Paris, October 8, 2004.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Xu, Y. and Zhang, L.M., Breaching parameters for earth and rockfill dams, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 2009, vol. 135, no. 12, pp. 1957–1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Farhad Hooshyaripor
    • 1
  • Ahmad Tahershamsi
    • 2
  • Kourosh Behzadian
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environment EngineeringTehranIran
  2. 2.Amirkabir University of TechnologyTehranIran
  3. 3.Centre for Water SystemsUniversity of ExeterExeterUK

Personalised recommendations