Advertisement

On monodromy eigenfunctions of Heun equations and boundaries of phase-lock areas in a model of overdamped Josephson effect

  • V. M. Buchstaber
  • A. A. Glutsyuk
Article

Abstract

We study a family of double confluent Heun equations of the form LE = 0, where L = L λ,μ,n is a family of second-order differential operators acting on germs of holomorphic functions of one complex variable. They depend on complex parameters λ, μ, and n. The restriction of the family to real parameters satisfying the inequality λ + μ 2 > 0 is a linearization of the family of nonlinear equations on the two-torus that model the Josephson effect in superconductivity. We show that for all b, n ∈ ℂ satisfying a certain “non-resonance condition” and for all parameter values λ, μ ∈ ℂ, μ ≠ 0, there exists an entire function f ±: ℂ → ℂ (unique up to a constant factor) such that z b L(z b f ±(z ±1)) = d + d z for some d , d ∈ ℂ. The constants d j are expressed as functions of the parameters. This result has several applications. First of all, it gives the description of those values λ, μ, n, and b for which the monodromy operator of the corresponding Heun equation has eigenvalue e 2πib . It also gives the description of those values λ, μ, and n for which the monodromy is parabolic, i.e., has a multiple eigenvalue. We consider the rotation number ρ of the dynamical system on the two-torus as a function of parameters restricted to a surface λ + μ 2 = const. The phase-lock areas are its level sets with nonempty interior. For general families of dynamical systems, the problem of describing the boundaries of the phase-lock areas is known to be very complicated. In the present paper we include the results in this direction that were obtained by methods of complex variables. In our case the phase-lock areas exist only for integer rotation numbers (quantization effect), and their complement is an open set. On their complement the rotation number function is an analytic submersion that induces its fibration by analytic curves. The above-mentioned result on parabolic monodromy implies the explicit description of the union of boundaries of the phase-lock areas as solutions of an explicit transcendental functional equation. For every θ ∉ ℤ we get a description of the set {ρ ≡ ±θ (mod 2ℤ)}.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    V. I. Arnold, Geometrical Methods in the Theory of Ordinary Differential Equations, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York, 1988), Grundl. Math. Wiss. 250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. I. Arnold and Yu. S. Ilyashenko, “Ordinary differential equations,” in Dynamical Systems–1 (VINITI, Moscow, 1985), Itogi Nauki Tekh., Ser.: Sovrem. Probl. Mat., Fundam. Napravl. 1, pp. 7–140; Engl. transl. in Dynamical Systems I (Springer, Berlin,1988), Encycl. Math. Sci. 1, pp. 1–148.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Barone and G. Paternò, Physics and Applications of the Josephson Effect (J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. M. Buchstaber and A. A. Glutsyuk, “On determinants of modified Bessel functions and entire solutions of double confluent Heun equations,” Nonlinearity 29 (12), 3857–3870 (2016).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. M. Buchstaber, O. V. Karpov, and S. I. Tertychniy, “Electrodynamic properties of a Josephson junction biased with a sequence of delta-function pulses,” Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 120 (6), 1478–1485 (2001) [J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 93 (6), 1280–1287 (2001)].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. M. Buchstaber, O. V. Karpov, and S. I. Tertychnyi, “On properties of the differential equation describing the dynamics of an overdamped Josephson junction,” Usp. Mat. Nauk 59 (2), 187–188 (2004) [Russ. Math. Surv. 59, 377–378 (2004)].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. M. Buchstaber, O. V. Karpov, and S. I. Tertychnyi, “Features of the dynamics of a Josephson junction biased by a sinusoidal microwave current,” Radiotekh. Elektron. 51 (6), 757–762 (2006) [J. Commun. Technol. Electron. 51, 713–718 (2006)].Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. M. Buchstaber, O. V. Karpov, and S. I. Tertychniy, “Rotation number quantization effect,” Teor. Mat. Fiz. 162 (2), 254–265 (2010) [Theor. Math. Phys. 162, 211–221 (2010)].MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. M. Buchstaber, O. V. Karpov, and S. I. Tertychnyi, “A system on a torus modelling the dynamics of a Josephson junction,” Usp. Mat. Nauk 67 (1), 181–182 (2012) [Russ. Math. Surv. 67, 178–180 (2012)].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. M. Buchstaber and S. I. Tertychniy, “Explicit solution family for the equation of the resistively shunted Josephson junction model,” Teor. Mat. Fiz. 176 (2), 163–188 (2013) [Theor. Math. Phys. 176, 965–986 (2013)].MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    V. M. Buchstaber and S. I. Tertychnyi, “Holomorphic solutions of the double confluent Heun equation associated with the RSJ model of the Josephson junction,” Teor. Mat. Fiz. 182 (3), 373–404 (2015) [Theor. Math. Phys. 182, 329–355 (2015)].MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. M. Buchstaber and S. I. Tertychnyi, “On a remarkable sequence of Bessel matrices,” Mat. Zametki 98 (5), 651–663 (2015) [Math. Notes 98, 714–724 (2015)].MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. M. Buchstaber and S. I. Tertychnyi, “Automorphisms of the solution spaces of special double-confluent Heun equations,” Funkts. Anal. Prilozh. 50 (3), 12–33 (2016) [Funct. Anal. Appl. 50, 176–192 (2016)].MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. L. Foote, “Geometry of the Prytz planimeter,” Rep. Math. Phys. 42 (1–2), 249–271 (1998).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. Foote, M. Levi, and S. Tabachnikov, “Tractrices, bicycle tire tracks, hatchet planimeters, and a 100-year-old conjecture,” Am. Math. Mon. 120 (3), 199–216 (2013).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. A. Glutsyuk, V. A. Kleptsyn, D. A. Filimonov, and I. V. Schurov, “On the adjacency quantization in an equation modeling the Josephson effect,” Funkts. Anal. Prilozh. 48 (4), 47–64 (2014) [Funct. Anal. Appl. 48, 272–285 (2014)].MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. C. Gunning and H. Rossi, Analytic Functions of Several Complex Variables (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1965).MATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    V. P. Il’in and Yu. I. Kuznetsov, Ttidiagonal Matrices and Their Applications (Nauka, Moscow, 1985) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yu. S. Ilyashenko, Lectures of the Summer School “Dynamical Systems” (Poprad, Slovakia, 2009).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yu. S. Ilyashenko, D. A. Ryzhov, and D. A. Filimonov, “Phase-lock effect for equations modeling resistively shunted Josephson junctions and for their perturbations,” Funkts. Anal. Prilozh. 45 (3), 41–54 (2011) [Funct. Anal. Appl. 45, 192–203 (2011)].CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    B. D. Josephson, “Possible new effects in superconductive tunnelling,” Phys. Lett. 1 (7), 251–253 (1962).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Klimenko and O. Romaskevich, “Asymptotic properties of Arnold tongues and Josephson effect,” Moscow Math. J. 14 (2), 367–384 (2014).MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    K. K. Likharev and B. T. Ul’rikh, Systems with Josephson Junctions: Basic Theory (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1978) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    D. E. McCumber, “Effect of ac impedance on dc voltage–current characteristics of superconductor weak-link junctions,” J. Appl. Phys. 39 (7), 3113–3118 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Ed. by F. W. J. Olver, D. W. Lozier, R. F. Boisvert, and C.W. Clark (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2010).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    V. V. Schmidt, Introduction to Physics of Superconductors, 2nd ed. (MCCME, Moscow, 2000); Engl. transl. of the 1st ed.: The Physics of Superconductors: Introduction to Fundamentals and Applications (Springer, Berlin,1997).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    S. Shapiro, A. R. Janus, and S. Holly, “Effect of microwaves on Josephson currents in superconducting tunneling,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 36 (1), 223–225 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    S. Yu. Slavyanov and W. Lay, Special Functions: A Unified Theory Based on Singularities (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2000).MATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    W. C. Stewart, “Current–voltage characteristics of Josephson junctions,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 12 (8), 277–280 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    S. I. Tertychniy, “Long-term behavior of solutions of the equation ϕ̇ + sinϕ = f with periodic f and the modeling of dynamics of overdamped Josephson junctions: Unlectured notes,” arxiv:math-ph/0512058.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    S. I. Tertychniy, “The modelling of a Josephson junction and Heun polynomials,” arxiv: math-ph/0601064.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Steklov Mathematical Institute of Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.All-Russian Scientific Research Institute for Physical and Radio-Technical Measurements (VNIIFTRI)Mendeleevo, Solnechnogorskii raion, Moscow oblastRussia
  3. 3.CNRS (UMR 5669, UMPAÉcole normale supérieure de LyonLyon Cedex 07France
  4. 4.Interdisciplinary Scientific Center J.-V. PonceletMoscowRussia
  5. 5.National Research University “Higher School of Economics,”MoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations