# On monodromy eigenfunctions of Heun equations and boundaries of phase-lock areas in a model of overdamped Josephson effect

- 45 Downloads
- 1 Citations

## Abstract

We study a family of double confluent Heun equations of the form *LE* = 0, where *L* = *L* _{ λ,μ,n } is a family of second-order differential operators acting on germs of holomorphic functions of one complex variable. They depend on complex parameters *λ*, *μ*, and *n*. The restriction of the family to real parameters satisfying the inequality *λ* + *μ* ^{2} > 0 is a linearization of the family of nonlinear equations on the two-torus that model the Josephson effect in superconductivity. We show that for all *b*, *n* ∈ ℂ satisfying a certain “non-resonance condition” and for all parameter values *λ*, *μ* ∈ ℂ, *μ* ≠ 0, there exists an entire function *f* _{±}: ℂ → ℂ (unique up to a constant factor) such that *z* ^{−b } *L*(*z* ^{ b } *f* _{±}(*z* ^{±1})) = *d* _{0±} + *d* _{1±z } for some *d* _{0±}, *d* _{1±} ∈ ℂ. The constants *d* _{ j,±} are expressed as functions of the parameters. This result has several applications. First of all, it gives the description of those values *λ*, *μ*, *n*, and *b* for which the monodromy operator of the corresponding Heun equation has eigenvalue *e* ^{2πib }. It also gives the description of those values *λ*, *μ*, and *n* for which the monodromy is parabolic, i.e., has a multiple eigenvalue. We consider the rotation number *ρ* of the dynamical system on the two-torus as a function of parameters restricted to a surface *λ* + *μ* ^{2} = const. The phase-lock areas are its level sets with nonempty interior. For general families of dynamical systems, the problem of describing the boundaries of the phase-lock areas is known to be very complicated. In the present paper we include the results in this direction that were obtained by methods of complex variables. In our case the phase-lock areas exist only for integer rotation numbers (quantization effect), and their complement is an open set. On their complement the rotation number function is an analytic submersion that induces its fibration by analytic curves. The above-mentioned result on parabolic monodromy implies the explicit description of the union of boundaries of the phase-lock areas as solutions of an explicit transcendental functional equation. For every *θ* ∉ ℤ we get a description of the set {*ρ* ≡ ±*θ* (mod 2ℤ)}.

## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- 1.V. I. Arnold,
*Geometrical Methods in the Theory of Ordinary Differential Equations*, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York, 1988), Grundl. Math. Wiss.**250**.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 2.V. I. Arnold and Yu. S. Ilyashenko, “Ordinary differential equations,” in
*Dynamical Systems–1*(VINITI, Moscow, 1985), Itogi Nauki Tekh., Ser.: Sovrem. Probl. Mat., Fundam. Napravl. 1, pp. 7–140; Engl. transl. in Dynamical Systems I (Springer, Berlin,1988), Encycl. Math. Sci. 1, pp. 1–148.Google Scholar - 3.A. Barone and G. Paternò,
*Physics and Applications of the Josephson Effect*(J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 4.V. M. Buchstaber and A. A. Glutsyuk, “On determinants of modified Bessel functions and entire solutions of double confluent Heun equations,” Nonlinearity
**29**(12), 3857–3870 (2016).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 5.V. M. Buchstaber, O. V. Karpov, and S. I. Tertychniy, “Electrodynamic properties of a Josephson junction biased with a sequence of delta-function pulses,” Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.
**120**(6), 1478–1485 (2001) [J. Exp. Theor. Phys.**93**(6), 1280–1287 (2001)].Google Scholar - 6.V. M. Buchstaber, O. V. Karpov, and S. I. Tertychnyi, “On properties of the differential equation describing the dynamics of an overdamped Josephson junction,” Usp. Mat. Nauk
**59**(2), 187–188 (2004) [Russ. Math. Surv.**59**, 377–378 (2004)].CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 7.V. M. Buchstaber, O. V. Karpov, and S. I. Tertychnyi, “Features of the dynamics of a Josephson junction biased by a sinusoidal microwave current,” Radiotekh. Elektron.
**51**(6), 757–762 (2006) [J. Commun. Technol. Electron.**51**, 713–718 (2006)].Google Scholar - 8.V. M. Buchstaber, O. V. Karpov, and S. I. Tertychniy, “Rotation number quantization effect,” Teor. Mat. Fiz.
**162**(2), 254–265 (2010) [Theor. Math. Phys.**162**, 211–221 (2010)].MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 9.V. M. Buchstaber, O. V. Karpov, and S. I. Tertychnyi, “A system on a torus modelling the dynamics of a Josephson junction,” Usp. Mat. Nauk
**67**(1), 181–182 (2012) [Russ. Math. Surv.**67**, 178–180 (2012)].CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 10.V. M. Buchstaber and S. I. Tertychniy, “Explicit solution family for the equation of the resistively shunted Josephson junction model,” Teor. Mat. Fiz.
**176**(2), 163–188 (2013) [Theor. Math. Phys.**176**, 965–986 (2013)].MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 11.V. M. Buchstaber and S. I. Tertychnyi, “Holomorphic solutions of the double confluent Heun equation associated with the RSJ model of the Josephson junction,” Teor. Mat. Fiz.
**182**(3), 373–404 (2015) [Theor. Math. Phys.**182**, 329–355 (2015)].MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 12.V. M. Buchstaber and S. I. Tertychnyi, “On a remarkable sequence of Bessel matrices,” Mat. Zametki
**98**(5), 651–663 (2015) [Math. Notes**98**, 714–724 (2015)].MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 13.V. M. Buchstaber and S. I. Tertychnyi, “Automorphisms of the solution spaces of special double-confluent Heun equations,” Funkts. Anal. Prilozh.
**50**(3), 12–33 (2016) [Funct. Anal. Appl.**50**, 176–192 (2016)].MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 14.R. L. Foote, “Geometry of the Prytz planimeter,” Rep. Math. Phys.
**42**(1–2), 249–271 (1998).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 15.R. Foote, M. Levi, and S. Tabachnikov, “Tractrices, bicycle tire tracks, hatchet planimeters, and a 100-year-old conjecture,” Am. Math. Mon.
**120**(3), 199–216 (2013).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 16.A. A. Glutsyuk, V. A. Kleptsyn, D. A. Filimonov, and I. V. Schurov, “On the adjacency quantization in an equation modeling the Josephson effect,” Funkts. Anal. Prilozh.
**48**(4), 47–64 (2014) [Funct. Anal. Appl.**48**, 272–285 (2014)].MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 17.R. C. Gunning and H. Rossi,
*Analytic Functions of Several Complex Variables*(Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1965).MATHGoogle Scholar - 18.V. P. Il’in and Yu. I. Kuznetsov,
*Ttidiagonal Matrices and Their Applications*(Nauka, Moscow, 1985) [in Russian].Google Scholar - 19.Yu. S. Ilyashenko,
*Lectures of the Summer School “Dynamical Systems”*(Poprad, Slovakia, 2009).Google Scholar - 20.Yu. S. Ilyashenko, D. A. Ryzhov, and D. A. Filimonov, “Phase-lock effect for equations modeling resistively shunted Josephson junctions and for their perturbations,” Funkts. Anal. Prilozh.
**45**(3), 41–54 (2011) [Funct. Anal. Appl.**45**, 192–203 (2011)].CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 21.B. D. Josephson, “Possible new effects in superconductive tunnelling,” Phys. Lett.
**1**(7), 251–253 (1962).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 22.A. Klimenko and O. Romaskevich, “Asymptotic properties of Arnold tongues and Josephson effect,” Moscow Math. J.
**14**(2), 367–384 (2014).MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - 23.K. K. Likharev and B. T. Ul’rikh,
*Systems with Josephson Junctions: Basic Theory*(Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1978) [in Russian].Google Scholar - 24.D. E. McCumber, “Effect of ac impedance on dc voltage–current characteristics of superconductor weak-link junctions,” J. Appl. Phys.
**39**(7), 3113–3118 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 25.
*NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions*, Ed. by F. W. J. Olver, D. W. Lozier, R. F. Boisvert, and C.W. Clark (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2010).Google Scholar - 26.V. V. Schmidt,
*Introduction to Physics of Superconductors*, 2nd ed. (MCCME, Moscow, 2000); Engl. transl. of the 1st ed.: The Physics of Superconductors: Introduction to Fundamentals and Applications (Springer, Berlin,1997).Google Scholar - 27.S. Shapiro, A. R. Janus, and S. Holly, “Effect of microwaves on Josephson currents in superconducting tunneling,” Rev. Mod. Phys.
**36**(1), 223–225 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 28.S. Yu. Slavyanov and W. Lay,
*Special Functions: A Unified Theory Based on Singularities*(Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2000).MATHGoogle Scholar - 29.W. C. Stewart, “Current–voltage characteristics of Josephson junctions,” Appl. Phys. Lett.
**12**(8), 277–280 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 30.S. I. Tertychniy, “Long-term behavior of solutions of the equation
*ϕ̇*+ sin*ϕ*=*f*with periodic*f*and the modeling of dynamics of overdamped Josephson junctions: Unlectured notes,” arxiv:math-ph/0512058.Google Scholar - 31.S. I. Tertychniy, “The modelling of a Josephson junction and Heun polynomials,” arxiv: math-ph/0601064.Google Scholar